Shlomi Segall

1.5k total citations
26 papers, 470 citations indexed

About

Shlomi Segall is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Philosophy and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Shlomi Segall has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 470 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 12 papers in Philosophy and 8 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Shlomi Segall's work include Political Philosophy and Ethics (17 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (10 papers) and Free Will and Agency (8 papers). Shlomi Segall is often cited by papers focused on Political Philosophy and Ethics (17 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (10 papers) and Free Will and Agency (8 papers). Shlomi Segall collaborates with scholars based in Israel, United Kingdom and United States. Shlomi Segall's co-authors include and has published in prestigious journals such as The Philosophical Quarterly, Political Studies and Journal of Political Philosophy.

In The Last Decade

Shlomi Segall

25 papers receiving 434 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Shlomi Segall Israel 13 258 159 144 114 93 26 470
Gopal Sreenivasan United States 11 185 0.7× 146 0.9× 121 0.8× 73 0.6× 114 1.2× 32 481
Dennis McKerlie Canada 12 145 0.6× 93 0.6× 175 1.2× 96 0.8× 100 1.1× 23 424
Iwao Hirose Canada 10 83 0.3× 62 0.4× 135 0.9× 105 0.9× 33 0.4× 20 315
John Langan United States 9 85 0.3× 72 0.5× 73 0.5× 27 0.2× 111 1.2× 30 446
Richard L. Lippke United States 10 65 0.3× 50 0.3× 58 0.4× 113 1.0× 191 2.1× 60 382
Gene Outka United States 9 63 0.2× 87 0.5× 97 0.7× 24 0.2× 74 0.8× 17 309
Pope John Paul 11 64 0.2× 42 0.3× 94 0.7× 16 0.1× 148 1.6× 63 469
R. George Wright United States 6 67 0.3× 31 0.2× 14 0.1× 26 0.2× 146 1.6× 69 346
Karen Lebacqz United States 10 26 0.1× 86 0.5× 20 0.1× 23 0.2× 79 0.8× 39 296
Desmond Manderson Canada 12 50 0.2× 65 0.4× 25 0.2× 12 0.1× 181 1.9× 83 489

Countries citing papers authored by Shlomi Segall

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Shlomi Segall's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shlomi Segall with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shlomi Segall more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Shlomi Segall

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shlomi Segall. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shlomi Segall. The network helps show where Shlomi Segall may publish in the future.

No nodes

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Segall, Shlomi. (2023). To be (disadvantaged) or not to be? An egalitarian guide for creating new people. Politics Philosophy & Economics. 23(2). 154–180. 1 indexed citations
2.
Segall, Shlomi. (2021). Equality or priority about competing claims?. Economics and Philosophy. 38(2). 242–265.
3.
Segall, Shlomi. (2021). The Old Man’s Bundle, Still: Kristi Olson Revisits the Envy Test. Analysis. 81(2). 378–385. 1 indexed citations
4.
Segall, Shlomi. (2019). Why We Should be Negative about Positive Egalitarianism. Utilitas. 31(4). 414–430. 1 indexed citations
5.
Segall, Shlomi. (2018). Sufficientarianism and the Separateness of Persons. The Philosophical Quarterly. 69(274). 142–155. 3 indexed citations
6.
Segall, Shlomi. (2016). Why Inequality Matters. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 32 indexed citations
7.
Segall, Shlomi. (2016). Why Inequality Matters: Luck Egalitarianism, its Meaning and Value. 13 indexed citations
8.
Segall, Shlomi. (2015). INCAS AND ALIENS: THE TRUTH IN TELIC EGALITARIANISM. Economics and Philosophy. 32(1). 1–19. 13 indexed citations
9.
Segall, Shlomi. (2014). Equality for Inegalitarians. The Philosophical Quarterly. 65(259). 298–301. 3 indexed citations
10.
Segall, Shlomi. (2014). What is the Point of Sufficiency?. Journal of Applied Philosophy. 33(1). 36–52. 12 indexed citations
11.
Segall, Shlomi. (2013). Equality and Opportunity. Oxford University Press eBooks. 51 indexed citations
12.
Segall, Shlomi. (2012). What's so Bad about Discrimination?. Utilitas. 24(1). 82–100. 26 indexed citations
13.
Segall, Shlomi. (2011). Why Egalitarians Should Not Care About Equality. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. 15(4). 507–519. 16 indexed citations
14.
Segall, Shlomi. (2011). If you’re a luck egalitarian, how come you read bedtime stories to your children?. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. 14(1). 23–40. 10 indexed citations
15.
Segall, Shlomi. (2010). Is Health (Really) Special? Health Policy between Rawlsian and Luck Egalitarian Justice. Journal of Applied Philosophy. 27(4). 344–358. 22 indexed citations
16.
Segall, Shlomi. (2007). In Solidarity with the Imprudent. Social Theory and Practice. 33(2). 177–198. 31 indexed citations
17.
Segall, Shlomi. (2007). Is Health Care (Still) Special?*. Journal of Political Philosophy. 15(3). 342–361. 41 indexed citations
18.
Segall, Shlomi. (2005). Unconditional welfare benefits and the principle of reciprocity. Politics Philosophy & Economics. 4(3). 331–354. 20 indexed citations
19.
Segall, Shlomi. (2005). Political Participation as an Engine of Social Solidarity: A Sceptical View. Political Studies. 53(2). 362–378. 26 indexed citations
20.
Segall, Shlomi. (2004). ‘Bringing the Middle Classes Back In’An Egalitarian Case for (Truly) Universal Public Services. 2(1). 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026