Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
An “essential herbal medicine”—licorice: A review of phytochemicals and its effects in combination preparations
2019217 citationsMaoyuan Jiang, Shengjia Zhao et al.Journal of Ethnopharmacologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Shengjia Zhao's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shengjia Zhao with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shengjia Zhao more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shengjia Zhao. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shengjia Zhao. The network helps show where Shengjia Zhao may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Shengjia Zhao
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Shengjia Zhao.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Shengjia Zhao based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Shengjia Zhao. Shengjia Zhao is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Zhao, Shengjia, et al.. (2020). Impact of Traffic Exposure and Land Use Patterns on the Risk of COVID-19 Spread at the Community Level. Zhongguo gonglu xuebao. 33(11). 43–54.3 indexed citations
8.
Ren, Hongyu, Shengjia Zhao, & Stefano Ermon. (2019). Adaptive Antithetic Sampling for Variance Reduction. International Conference on Machine Learning. 5420–5428.2 indexed citations
9.
Kim, Kun Ho, et al.. (2019). Cross Domain Imitation Learning. arXiv (Cornell University).1 indexed citations
10.
Jiang, Maoyuan, Shengjia Zhao, Shasha Yang, et al.. (2019). An “essential herbal medicine”—licorice: A review of phytochemicals and its effects in combination preparations. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 249. 112439–112439.217 indexed citations breakdown →
Shu, Rui, Shengjia Zhao, & Mykel J. Kochenderfer. (2018). Rethinking Style and Content Disentanglement in Variational Autoencoders. International Conference on Learning Representations.3 indexed citations
13.
Zhao, Shengjia, Hongyu Ren, Arianna Yuan, et al.. (2018). Bias and Generalization in Deep Generative Models: An Empirical Study. arXiv (Cornell University). 31. 10792–10801.7 indexed citations
14.
Zhao, Shengjia, Jiaming Song, & Stefano Ermon. (2018). A Lagrangian Perspective on Latent Variable Generative Models. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. 1031–1041.1 indexed citations
Zhao, Shengjia, Jiaming Song, & Stefano Ermon. (2017). Learning Hierarchical Features from Deep Generative Models. International Conference on Machine Learning. 4091–4099.37 indexed citations
17.
Song, Jiaming, Shengjia Zhao, & Stefano Ermon. (2017). Generative Adversarial Learning of Markov Chains. International Conference on Learning Representations.
18.
Song, Jiaming, Shengjia Zhao, & Stefano Ermon. (2017). A-NICE-MC: Adversarial Training for MCMC. arXiv (Cornell University). 30. 5140–5150.16 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.