Sheng Ding

19.6k total citations · 6 hit papers
106 papers, 13.4k citations indexed

About

Sheng Ding is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Biomedical Engineering and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Sheng Ding has authored 106 papers receiving a total of 13.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 91 papers in Molecular Biology, 25 papers in Biomedical Engineering and 18 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Sheng Ding's work include Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (67 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (45 papers) and 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (24 papers). Sheng Ding is often cited by papers focused on Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (67 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (45 papers) and 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (24 papers). Sheng Ding collaborates with scholars based in United States, China and Germany. Sheng Ding's co-authors include Peter G. Schultz, Saiyong Zhu, Wenlin Li, Hans R. Schöler, Hongyan Zhou, Yan Shi, Heung Sik Hahm, Yuan Xu, Caroline Desponts and Tongxiang Lin and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and New England Journal of Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Sheng Ding

104 papers receiving 13.1k citations

Hit Papers

Clearance of senescent cells by ABT263 rejuvenates ag... 2008 2026 2014 2020 2015 2009 2008 2010 2011 400 800 1.2k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sheng Ding United States 50 10.5k 2.3k 2.1k 1.7k 1.1k 106 13.4k
Chad A. Cowan United States 37 10.1k 1.0× 1.9k 0.8× 1.2k 0.6× 1.3k 0.8× 1.9k 1.8× 83 12.5k
Nissim Benvenisty Israel 60 12.1k 1.2× 2.8k 1.2× 2.0k 0.9× 1.3k 0.8× 982 0.9× 194 14.6k
Andrew G. Elefanty Australia 51 7.6k 0.7× 2.5k 1.1× 1.6k 0.7× 577 0.3× 1.1k 1.0× 164 11.0k
Dean Y. Li United States 51 4.1k 0.4× 1.9k 0.8× 1.5k 0.7× 430 0.2× 1.6k 1.5× 119 9.9k
Derrick J. Rossi United States 52 10.3k 1.0× 1.2k 0.5× 673 0.3× 1.7k 1.0× 824 0.8× 90 15.7k
Ernst J. Wolvetang Australia 47 5.4k 0.5× 970 0.4× 1.2k 0.6× 727 0.4× 480 0.5× 162 8.1k
Todd Evans United States 55 9.0k 0.9× 1.5k 0.6× 552 0.3× 881 0.5× 303 0.3× 161 11.7k
Mark A. Sussman United States 61 7.3k 0.7× 3.0k 1.3× 395 0.2× 986 0.6× 640 0.6× 193 11.9k
Karl H. Plate Germany 68 10.8k 1.0× 1.1k 0.5× 602 0.3× 729 0.4× 1.4k 1.4× 159 17.1k
Beatrice Nico Italy 59 6.0k 0.6× 886 0.4× 561 0.3× 1.1k 0.7× 730 0.7× 236 10.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Sheng Ding

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sheng Ding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sheng Ding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sheng Ding more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sheng Ding

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sheng Ding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sheng Ding. The network helps show where Sheng Ding may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sheng Ding

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sheng Ding. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sheng Ding based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sheng Ding. Sheng Ding is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hao, Jie, Jilong Ren, Jinghuan Yang, et al.. (2025). Single‐cell multi‐omics deciphers hepatocyte dedifferentiation and illuminates maintenance strategies. Cell Proliferation. 58(3). e13772–e13772. 2 indexed citations
2.
Xiao, Shiqi, Yao Liu, Sheng Ding, et al.. (2025). GenX-loaded polystyrene microplastics exacerbate intestinal injury in mice via barrier impairment and microbial dysregulation. Journal of environmental chemical engineering. 13(6). 119812–119812.
4.
Zhou, Wei, Pengqi Wang, Dan Wang, et al.. (2024). Pharmacologically inducing regenerative cardiac cells by small molecule drugs. eLife. 13. 2 indexed citations
5.
Zhou, Wei, et al.. (2024). Pharmacologically inducing regenerative cardiac cells by small molecule drugs. eLife. 13. 1 indexed citations
6.
Anderson, Sean M., Brian H. Lee, Andy Vail, et al.. (2023). Fiber chromatographic enabled process intensification increases monoclonal antibody product yield. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 121(2). 757–770. 2 indexed citations
7.
Hu, Yanyan, Yuanyuan Yang, Pengcheng Tan, et al.. (2022). Induction of mouse totipotent stem cells by a defined chemical cocktail. Nature. 617(7962). 792–797. 67 indexed citations
8.
Yang, Bing, Shibing Tang, Cheng Ma, et al.. (2017). Spontaneous and specific chemical cross-linking in live cells to capture and identify protein interactions. Nature Communications. 8(1). 2240–2240. 95 indexed citations
9.
Cao, Nan, Yu Huang, Jiashun Zheng, et al.. (2016). Conversion of human fibroblasts into functional cardiomyocytes by small molecules. Science. 352(6290). 1216–1220. 289 indexed citations
10.
Chen, Yu, et al.. (2014). Chemical approaches to cell reprogramming. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development. 28. 50–56. 45 indexed citations
11.
Ma, Tianhua, Min Xie, Timothy Laurent, & Sheng Ding. (2013). Progress in the Reprogramming of Somatic Cells. Circulation Research. 112(3). 562–574. 85 indexed citations
12.
Zhu, Saiyong, Wanguo Wei, & Sheng Ding. (2011). Chemical Strategies for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering. 13(1). 73–90. 50 indexed citations
13.
Ding, Sheng, et al.. (2010). Cellular Programming and Reprogramming. Methods in molecular biology. 8 indexed citations
14.
Lian, Ian, Joungmok Kim, Hideki Okazawa, et al.. (2010). The role of YAP transcription coactivator in regulating stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. Genes & Development. 24(11). 1106–1118. 605 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
Shi, Yan, Caroline Desponts, Jeong Tae, et al.. (2008). Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Mouse Embryonic Fibroblasts by Oct4 and Klf4 with Small-Molecule Compounds. Cell stem cell. 3(5). 568–574. 655 indexed citations breakdown →
16.
Xu, Yue, Yan Shi, & Sheng Ding. (2008). A chemical approach to stem-cell biology and regenerative medicine. Nature. 453(7193). 338–344. 257 indexed citations
17.
Chen, Shuibing, Jeong Tae, Qisheng Zhang, et al.. (2006). Self-renewal of embryonic stem cells by a small molecule. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 103(46). 17266–17271. 241 indexed citations
18.
Warashina, Masaki, Kyung Hoon Min, Tomoko Kuwabara, et al.. (2005). A Synthetic Small Molecule That Induces Neuronal Differentiation of Adult Hippocampal Neural Progenitor Cells. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 45(4). 591–593. 83 indexed citations
19.
Chen, Shuibing, Simon Hilcove, & Sheng Ding. (2005). Exploring stem cell biology with small molecules. Molecular BioSystems. 2(1). 18–24. 35 indexed citations
20.
Ding, Sheng, Tom Wu, Achim Brinker, et al.. (2003). Synthetic small molecules that control stem cell fate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 100(13). 7632–7637. 306 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026