Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Sharon Kirmeyer
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Sharon Kirmeyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sharon Kirmeyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sharon Kirmeyer more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sharon Kirmeyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sharon Kirmeyer. The network helps show where Sharon Kirmeyer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sharon Kirmeyer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sharon Kirmeyer.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sharon Kirmeyer based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Sharon Kirmeyer. Sharon Kirmeyer is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Hamilton, Brady E & Sharon Kirmeyer. (2017). Trends and Variations in Reproduction and Intrinsic Rates: United States, 1990-2014.. PubMed. 66(2). 1–14.10 indexed citations
2.
Branum, Amy M., Sharon Kirmeyer, & Elizabeth C W Gregory. (2016). Prepregnancy Body Mass Index by Maternal Characteristics and State: Data From the Birth Certificate, 2014.. PubMed. 65(6). 1–11.128 indexed citations
3.
Thoma, Marie E., Casey E. Copen, & Sharon Kirmeyer. (2016). Short Interpregnancy Intervals in 2014: Differences by Maternal Demographic Characteristics.. PubMed. 1–8.36 indexed citations
4.
Copen, Casey E., Marie E. Thoma, & Sharon Kirmeyer. (2015). Interpregnancy Intervals in the United States: Data From the Birth Certificate and the National Survey of Family Growth.. PubMed. 64(3). 1–10.68 indexed citations
5.
Martin, Joyce A, Michelle J K Osterman, Sharon Kirmeyer, & Elizabeth C W Gregory. (2015). Measuring Gestational Age in Vital Statistics Data: Transitioning to the Obstetric Estimate.. PubMed. 64(5). 1–20.162 indexed citations
6.
Osterman, Michelle J K, et al.. (2013). Newly released data from the revised U.S. birth certificate, 2011.. PubMed. 62(4). 1–22.21 indexed citations
7.
Kochanek, Kenneth D., Sharon Kirmeyer, Joyce A Martin, Donna M. Strobino, & Bernard Guyer. (2012). Annual Summary of Vital Statistics: 2009. PEDIATRICS. 129(2). 338–348.150 indexed citations
8.
MacDorman, Marian F., Sharon Kirmeyer, & Elizabeth Wilson. (2012). Fetal and perinatal mortality, United States, 2006.. PubMed. 60(8). 1–22.263 indexed citations
9.
Kirmeyer, Sharon & Brady E Hamilton. (2011). Transitions between childlessness and first birth: three generations of U.S. women.. PubMed. 1–18.6 indexed citations
10.
Kirmeyer, Sharon & Brady E Hamilton. (2011). Childbearing differences among three generations of U.S. women.. PubMed. 1–8.17 indexed citations
MacDorman, Marian F., et al.. (2007). Fetal and perinatal mortality, United States, 2004.. PubMed. 56(3). 1–19.116 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.