Sharon E. Bickel

1.5k total citations
28 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Sharon E. Bickel is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Sharon E. Bickel has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Molecular Biology, 15 papers in Plant Science and 7 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Sharon E. Bickel's work include Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (16 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (15 papers) and DNA Repair Mechanisms (13 papers). Sharon E. Bickel is often cited by papers focused on Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (16 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (15 papers) and DNA Repair Mechanisms (13 papers). Sharon E. Bickel collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Sharon E. Bickel's co-authors include Terry L. Orr‐Weaver, Vincenzo Pirrotta, M. Douglas Benson, Radhika S. Khetani, Hayley Webber, Vijayalakshmi V. Subramanian, Lynn Young, Mark D. Biggin, Robert Tjian and Louisa Howard and has published in prestigious journals such as Cell, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Genes & Development.

In The Last Decade

Sharon E. Bickel

26 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sharon E. Bickel United States 19 1.0k 471 323 174 157 28 1.2k
Janet K. Jang United States 17 952 0.9× 429 0.9× 520 1.6× 110 0.6× 136 0.9× 27 1.1k
Bruce D. McKee United States 21 1.3k 1.3× 872 1.9× 236 0.7× 496 2.9× 58 0.4× 36 1.5k
Valérie Borde France 25 2.3k 2.3× 544 1.2× 362 1.1× 259 1.5× 51 0.3× 44 2.4k
William D Gilliland United States 12 473 0.5× 294 0.6× 198 0.6× 128 0.7× 63 0.4× 21 609
Amy J. MacQueen United States 21 2.0k 2.0× 325 0.7× 532 1.6× 231 1.3× 130 0.8× 29 2.2k
Matyáš Flemr Czechia 14 988 1.0× 300 0.6× 62 0.2× 119 0.7× 197 1.3× 19 1.2k
Jibak Lee Japan 17 850 0.8× 214 0.5× 399 1.2× 155 0.9× 489 3.1× 35 1.1k
Lorinda K. Anderson United States 24 1.4k 1.4× 1.4k 2.9× 196 0.6× 661 3.8× 47 0.3× 40 2.1k
Diana S. Chu United States 15 632 0.6× 131 0.3× 200 0.6× 135 0.8× 178 1.1× 19 936
Maura Lane United States 9 537 0.5× 93 0.2× 61 0.2× 147 0.8× 84 0.5× 14 685

Countries citing papers authored by Sharon E. Bickel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sharon E. Bickel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sharon E. Bickel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sharon E. Bickel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sharon E. Bickel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sharon E. Bickel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sharon E. Bickel. The network helps show where Sharon E. Bickel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sharon E. Bickel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sharon E. Bickel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sharon E. Bickel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sharon E. Bickel. Sharon E. Bickel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Norwitz, Nicholas G., et al.. (2025). Meiotic cohesion requires Sirt1 and preserving its activity in aging oocytes reduces missegregation. EMBO Reports. 26(24). 6121–6140.
3.
Haseeb, Muhammad, et al.. (2024). An RNAi screen to identify proteins required for cohesion rejuvenation during meiotic prophase in Drosophila oocytes. G3 Genes Genomes Genetics. 14(8). 3 indexed citations
4.
Haseeb, Muhammad, et al.. (2024). Chromatin-associated cohesin turns over extensively and forms new cohesive linkages in Drosophila oocytes during meiotic prophase. Current Biology. 34(13). 2868–2879.e6. 5 indexed citations
5.
McPeek, Mark A., et al.. (2019). Increased levels of superoxide dismutase suppress meiotic segregation errors in aging oocytes. Chromosoma. 128(3). 215–222. 32 indexed citations
7.
Bickel, Sharon E., et al.. (2014). Rejuvenation of Meiotic Cohesion in Oocytes during Prophase I Is Required for Chiasma Maintenance and Accurate Chromosome Segregation. PLoS Genetics. 10(9). e1004607–e1004607. 28 indexed citations
8.
Subramanian, Vijayalakshmi V. & Sharon E. Bickel. (2009). Heterochromatin-Mediated Association of Achiasmate Homologs Declines With Age When Cohesion Is Compromised. Genetics. 181(4). 1207–1218. 9 indexed citations
9.
Subramanian, Vijayalakshmi V. & Sharon E. Bickel. (2008). Aging Predisposes Oocytes to Meiotic Nondisjunction When the Cohesin Subunit SMC1 Is Reduced. PLoS Genetics. 4(11). e1000263–e1000263. 50 indexed citations
10.
Page, Scott L., Radhika S. Khetani, Cathleen M. Lake, et al.. (2008). corona Is Required for Higher-Order Assembly of Transverse Filaments into Full-Length Synaptonemal Complex in Drosophila Oocytes. PLoS Genetics. 4(9). e1000194–e1000194. 61 indexed citations
11.
Khetani, Radhika S. & Sharon E. Bickel. (2007). Regulation of meiotic cohesion and chromosome core morphogenesis during pachytene inDrosophilaoocytes. Journal of Cell Science. 120(17). 3123–3137. 52 indexed citations
12.
Webber, Hayley, Louisa Howard, & Sharon E. Bickel. (2004). The cohesion protein ORD is required for homologue bias during meiotic recombination. The Journal of Cell Biology. 164(6). 819–829. 66 indexed citations
13.
Orr‐Weaver, Terry L., et al.. (2004). A proposed role for the Polycomb group protein dRING in meiotic sister-chromatid cohesion. Chromosoma. 112(5). 231–239. 8 indexed citations
14.
Burrage, Peter S., et al.. (2003). A Model System for Increased Meiotic Nondisjunction in Older Oocytes. Current Biology. 13(6). 498–503. 41 indexed citations
15.
Lai, Cary, et al.. (2002). Meiotic Cohesion Requires Accumulation of ORD on Chromosomes before Condensation. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 13(11). 3890–3900. 24 indexed citations
16.
Bickel, Sharon E., et al.. (2002). The Sister-Chromatid Cohesion Protein ORD Is Required for Chiasma Maintenance in Drosophila Oocytes. Current Biology. 12(11). 925–929. 46 indexed citations
17.
Bickel, Sharon E., et al.. (1998). Maintenance of sister-chromatid cohesion at the centromere by the Drosophila MEI-S332 protein. Genes & Development. 12(24). 3843–3856. 95 indexed citations
18.
Bickel, Sharon E., D. Moore, Cary Lai, & Terry L. Orr‐Weaver. (1998). Genetic Interactions Between mei-S332 and ord in the Control of Sister-Chromatid Cohesion. Genetics. 150(4). 1467–1476. 17 indexed citations
19.
Bickel, Sharon E., et al.. (1997). Mutational Analysis of the Drosophila Sister-Chromatid Cohesion Protein ORD and Its Role in the Maintenance of Centromeric Cohesion. Genetics. 146(4). 1319–1331. 53 indexed citations
20.
Bickel, Sharon E. & Terry L. Orr‐Weaver. (1996). Holding chromatids together to ensure they go their separate ways. BioEssays. 18(4). 293–300. 53 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026