Shannon Harkness

528 total citations
9 papers, 345 citations indexed

About

Shannon Harkness is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Surgery and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Shannon Harkness has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 345 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Biomedical Engineering, 6 papers in Surgery and 5 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Recurrent topics in Shannon Harkness's work include Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (7 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (6 papers) and Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (3 papers). Shannon Harkness is often cited by papers focused on Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (7 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (6 papers) and Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (3 papers). Shannon Harkness collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Shannon Harkness's co-authors include Margaret T. Lee, Scott T. Miller, Robert J. Adams, Sergio Piomelli, Suzanne Granger, Donald Brambilla, Judith S. Hochman, Lynn A. Sleeper, Prakash Krishnan and Raban Jeger and has published in prestigious journals such as Blood, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and European Heart Journal.

In The Last Decade

Shannon Harkness

8 papers receiving 328 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Shannon Harkness United States 7 164 158 93 92 83 9 345
Jean Leroy France 8 24 0.1× 200 1.3× 10 0.1× 108 1.2× 135 1.6× 9 361
Hakkı Tankut Akay Türkiye 10 14 0.1× 28 0.2× 23 0.2× 116 1.3× 104 1.3× 49 270
Thomas Rehak Austria 11 9 0.1× 61 0.4× 40 0.4× 44 0.5× 146 1.8× 16 350
Ilaria Amodeo Italy 11 12 0.1× 25 0.2× 25 0.3× 150 1.6× 13 0.2× 32 294
Raffaelino Pugliese Italy 6 44 0.3× 42 0.3× 10 0.1× 134 1.5× 132 1.6× 8 429
Richard Kates United States 8 21 0.1× 22 0.1× 11 0.1× 89 1.0× 103 1.2× 9 369
Lucie Gaide‐Chevronnay France 7 8 0.0× 26 0.2× 216 2.3× 140 1.5× 44 0.5× 9 334
Motoshi Tanaka Japan 7 7 0.0× 24 0.2× 36 0.4× 146 1.6× 54 0.7× 17 362
Jamie A. Decker United States 12 39 0.2× 7 0.0× 226 2.4× 349 3.8× 593 7.1× 31 856
John Kneeshaw United Kingdom 8 56 0.3× 3 0.0× 60 0.6× 168 1.8× 183 2.2× 17 407

Countries citing papers authored by Shannon Harkness

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Shannon Harkness's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shannon Harkness with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shannon Harkness more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Shannon Harkness

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shannon Harkness. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shannon Harkness. The network helps show where Shannon Harkness may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Shannon Harkness

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Shannon Harkness. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Shannon Harkness based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Shannon Harkness. Shannon Harkness is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Krishnan, Prakash, Michael E. Farkouh, J. French, et al.. (2011). Rapid complete reversal of systemic hypoperfusion after intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation and survival in cardiogenic shock complicating an acute myocardial infarction. American Heart Journal. 162(2). 268–275. 12 indexed citations
2.
Jeger, Raban, Philip Urban, Shannon Harkness, et al.. (2011). Early revascularization is beneficial across all ages and a wide spectrum of cardiogenic shock severity: A pooled analysis of trials. Acute Cardiac Care. 13(1). 14–20. 24 indexed citations
4.
Farkouh, Michael E., Prakash Krishnan, Eve Aymong, et al.. (2006). An early revascularization strategy is associated with a survival benefit for diabetic patients in cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction. Clinical Cardiology. 29(5). 204–210. 11 indexed citations
5.
Picard, Michael H., et al.. (2006). Echocardiographic and Angiographic Correlations in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Secondary to Acute Myocardial Infarction. The American Journal of Cardiology. 98(8). 1004–1008. 4 indexed citations
6.
Reynolds, Harmony R., Shannon Harkness, Vladimír Džavík, et al.. (2006). Restrictive physiology in cardiogenic shock: Observations from echocardiography. American Heart Journal. 151(4). 890.e9–890.e15. 22 indexed citations
7.
Lee, Margaret T., Sergio Piomelli, Suzanne Granger, et al.. (2006). Stroke Prevention Trial in Sickle Cell Anemia (STOP): extended follow-up and final results. Blood. 108(3). 847–852. 206 indexed citations
8.
Jeger, Raban, Shannon Harkness, Prakash Krishnan, et al.. (2006). Emergency revascularization in patients with cardiogenic shock on admission: a report from the SHOCK trial and registry. European Heart Journal. 27(6). 664–670. 60 indexed citations
9.
Krishnan, Prakash, Shannon Harkness, Ambika C. Nayar, et al.. (2004). 887-2 Cardiogenic shock in patients with preserved left ventricular systolic function: Characteristics and insight into mechanisms. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 43(5). A241–A241. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026