Shannon E. Large

462 total citations
9 papers, 376 citations indexed

About

Shannon E. Large is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Shannon E. Large has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 376 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Organic Chemistry, 8 papers in Inorganic Chemistry and 4 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Shannon E. Large's work include Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (8 papers), Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (6 papers) and Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (3 papers). Shannon E. Large is often cited by papers focused on Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (8 papers), Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (6 papers) and Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (3 papers). Shannon E. Large collaborates with scholars based in United States. Shannon E. Large's co-authors include Neil W. Boaz, Sheryl D. Debenham, James A. Ponasik, James L. Little, Janet Lightner, Vincent J. Wacher, Michael F. Wempe, Peter J. Rice, Charles M. Buchanan and Charles B. Wright and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Organic Chemistry, International Journal of Pharmaceutics and Organic Letters.

In The Last Decade

Shannon E. Large

9 papers receiving 365 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Shannon E. Large United States	8	244	244	126	84	33	9	376
Lavinia Panella Netherlands	12	378 1.5×	297 1.2×	246 2.0×	125 1.5×	23 0.7×	13	549
Nada Jaber France	12	304 1.2×	111 0.5×	115 0.9×	20 0.2×	20 0.6×	24	389
Anthony D. Baxter United Kingdom	10	253 1.0×	94 0.4×	162 1.3×	48 0.6×	18 0.5×	20	357
Hajime Saburi Japan	9	322 1.3×	189 0.8×	145 1.2×	25 0.3×	10 0.3×	10	383
Fabien Boeda France	13	623 2.6×	140 0.6×	202 1.6×	34 0.4×	11 0.3×	31	680
Julia Deschamp France	14	558 2.3×	266 1.1×	147 1.2×	17 0.2×	33 1.0×	28	609
Stefan Hildbrand Switzerland	9	234 1.0×	117 0.5×	222 1.8×	35 0.4×	13 0.4×	21	413
Thomas E. Storr United Kingdom	14	601 2.5×	115 0.5×	61 0.5×	28 0.3×	9 0.3×	21	672
Daniel J. Lippincott United States	14	454 1.9×	85 0.3×	75 0.6×	61 0.7×	12 0.4×	14	546
Damjan Šterk Slovenia	10	245 1.0×	241 1.0×	113 0.9×	137 1.6×	10 0.3×	13	395

Countries citing papers authored by Shannon E. Large

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Shannon E. Large's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shannon E. Large with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shannon E. Large more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Shannon E. Large

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shannon E. Large. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shannon E. Large. The network helps show where Shannon E. Large may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Shannon E. Large

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Shannon E. Large. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Shannon E. Large based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Shannon E. Large. Shannon E. Large is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Wempe, Michael F., Charles B. Wright, James L. Little, et al.. (2008). Inhibiting efflux with novel non-ionic surfactants: Rational design based on vitamin E TPGS. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 370(1-2). 93–102. 56 indexed citations

2.

Boaz, Neil W., James A. Ponasik, & Shannon E. Large. (2006). Ruthenium Complexes of Phosphine—Aminophosphine Ligands.. ChemInform. 37(39). 1 indexed citations

3.

Boaz, Neil W., James A. Ponasik, & Shannon E. Large. (2006). Ruthenium complexes of phosphine–aminophosphine ligands. Tetrahedron Letters. 47(24). 4033–4035. 24 indexed citations

4.

Boaz, Neil W., James A. Ponasik, & Shannon E. Large. (2005). A versatile synthesis of phosphine–aminophosphine ligands for asymmetric catalysis. Tetrahedron Asymmetry. 16(12). 2063–2066. 38 indexed citations

5.

Boaz, Neil W., et al.. (2005). The Preparation of Single Enantiomer 2-Naphthylalanine Derivatives Using Rhodium−Methyl BoPhoz-catalyzed Asymmetric Hydrogenation. Organic Process Research & Development. 9(4). 472–478. 34 indexed citations

6.

Boaz, Neil W., et al.. (2005). Synthesis and Application of Phosphinoferrocenylaminophosphine Ligands for Asymmetric Catalysis. The Journal of Organic Chemistry. 70(5). 1872–1880. 72 indexed citations

7.

Boaz, Neil W., James A. Ponasik, Shannon E. Large, & Sheryl D. Debenham. (2004). Ferrocenylphosphine-amide ligands for palladium-catalyzed asymmetric allylation. Tetrahedron Asymmetry. 15(14). 2151–2154. 26 indexed citations

8.

Boaz, Neil W., et al.. (2003). The preparation of enantiomerically pure cyclopropylalanine. Tetrahedron Asymmetry. 14(22). 3575–3580. 14 indexed citations

9.

Boaz, Neil W., et al.. (2002). Phosphinoferrocenylaminophosphines as Novel and Practical Ligands for Asymmetric Catalysis. Organic Letters. 4(14). 2421–2424. 111 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact