Seth Redmond
Impact in
-
- Malaria Research and Control
- Mosquito-borne diseases and control
- Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
- Insect Science top 5%
- Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences
Papers in
-
- Malaria Research and Control 8
- Mosquito-borne diseases and control 8
- Research on Leishmaniasis Studies 3
-
- Insect Resistance and Genetics 7
- Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies 2
- Co-authors
- Mark C. Field (2 shared papers)Jamuna Vadivelu (1 shared paper)Mara Lawniczak (2 shared papers)Daniel E. Neafsey (4 shared papers)Dyann F. Wirth (3 shared papers)George K. Christophides (3 shared papers)Igor V. Sharakhov (2 shared papers)Robert M. MacCallum (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- BMC Genomics (3 papers)BMC Biology (1 paper)Cell Reports (1 paper)Nature (1 paper)Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomFrance
In The Last Decade
Seth Redmond
18 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 655
- Insect Science 239
- Parasitology 98
- Immunology 177
- Molecular Biology 550
Countries citing papers authored by Seth Redmond
This map shows the geographic impact of Seth Redmond's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Seth Redmond with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Seth Redmond more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Seth Redmond
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Seth Redmond. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Seth Redmond. The network helps show where Seth Redmond may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Seth Redmond, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 231 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 198 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 135 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 120 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 99 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 94 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 71 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 38 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 37 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 33 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 32 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 25 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 21 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 18 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 15 | |
| 16 | 2020 | 13 | |
| 17 | 2018 | 11 | |
| 18 | 2024 | 1 |
About Seth Redmond
Seth Redmond is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Molecular Biology, Immunology, Insect Science and Genetics, having authored 18 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Malaria Research and Control (8 papers), Mosquito-borne diseases and control (8 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (7 papers), Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms (6 papers), Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (5 papers), Research on Leishmaniasis Studies (3 papers), Trypanosoma species research and implications (2 papers) and Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (655 citations), Insect Science (239 citations), Parasitology (98 citations), Immunology (177 citations) and Molecular Biology (550 citations). Seth Redmond has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Mark C. Field, Jamuna Vadivelu, Mara Lawniczak, Daniel E. Neafsey, Dyann F. Wirth, George K. Christophides, Igor V. Sharakhov, Robert M. MacCallum, Nora J. Besansky and Tiago Antão. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Genomics, BMC Biology, Cell Reports, Nature and Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.