Seth J. Scholer

2.8k total citations
39 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Seth J. Scholer is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions and Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Seth J. Scholer has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Clinical Psychology, 16 papers in General Health Professions and 9 papers in Health. Recurrent topics in Seth J. Scholer's work include Child Abuse and Trauma (19 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (14 papers) and Child and Adolescent Health (14 papers). Seth J. Scholer is often cited by papers focused on Child Abuse and Trauma (19 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (14 papers) and Child and Adolescent Health (14 papers). Seth J. Scholer collaborates with scholars based in United States, Vietnam and Canada. Seth J. Scholer's co-authors include Wayne A. Ray, Robert S. Dittus, Donald P. Orr, Gerald B. Hickson, Edward F. Mitchel, Mary S. Dietrich, Leonard Bickman, Joseph O’Neil, Robert Sege and H. Garry Gardner and has published in prestigious journals such as PEDIATRICS, The Journal of Pediatrics and Child Abuse & Neglect.

In The Last Decade

Seth J. Scholer

38 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Seth J. Scholer United States 16 565 337 308 251 229 39 1.2k
Joseph L. Wright United States 22 409 0.7× 422 1.3× 516 1.7× 299 1.2× 357 1.6× 58 1.5k
Susannah Baines United Kingdom 22 439 0.8× 76 0.2× 635 2.1× 75 0.3× 195 0.9× 40 1.5k
Sandra C. Tomany-Korman United States 11 457 0.8× 78 0.2× 152 0.5× 342 1.4× 869 3.8× 12 1.5k
Lydie A. Lebrun‐Harris United States 19 394 0.7× 147 0.4× 126 0.4× 65 0.3× 588 2.6× 45 1.3k
Robert Balogh Canada 19 422 0.7× 47 0.1× 490 1.6× 112 0.4× 151 0.7× 58 1.2k
Barry S. Solomon United States 19 271 0.5× 215 0.6× 312 1.0× 38 0.2× 588 2.6× 72 1.2k
Renee M. Turchi United States 21 457 0.8× 44 0.1× 157 0.5× 79 0.3× 537 2.3× 73 1.5k
Cameron Stark United Kingdom 22 580 1.0× 198 0.6× 176 0.6× 182 0.7× 324 1.4× 82 1.2k
Jeffrey Goldhagen United States 17 416 0.7× 113 0.3× 162 0.5× 30 0.1× 502 2.2× 58 1.1k
Jennifer A. Hoffmann United States 18 518 0.9× 182 0.5× 147 0.5× 293 1.2× 287 1.3× 69 910

Countries citing papers authored by Seth J. Scholer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Seth J. Scholer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Seth J. Scholer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Seth J. Scholer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Seth J. Scholer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Seth J. Scholer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Seth J. Scholer. The network helps show where Seth J. Scholer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Seth J. Scholer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Seth J. Scholer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Seth J. Scholer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Seth J. Scholer. Seth J. Scholer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Dietrich, Mary S., et al.. (2025). Missed opportunities to support parents' use of healthy discipline. Child Abuse & Neglect. 161. 107257–107257.
2.
Scholer, Seth J., et al.. (2024). A Brief Intervention in Primary Care to Improve Parents’ Discipline Practices and Reach Other Caregivers. Clinical Pediatrics. 63(11). 1502–1509. 4 indexed citations
3.
Scholer, Seth J., et al.. (2024). Integrating a Parenting Assessment into Practice: Pediatric Providers’ Time and Perspectives. Maternal and Child Health Journal. 28(10). 1663–1670. 1 indexed citations
4.
Watson, Kelly H., et al.. (2024). The Association of Quality of Life with Psychosocial Factors in Adolescents with Tourette Syndrome. Child Psychiatry & Human Development. 56(6). 1586–1597. 3 indexed citations
5.
Flannery, Daniel J., et al.. (2023). Bullying and School Violence. Pediatric Clinics of North America. 70(6). 1153–1170. 6 indexed citations
6.
Scholer, Seth J., et al.. (2023). Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validity study of the “Play Nicely Program: The Healthy Discipline Handbook” for use in Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem. 76(6). e20220281–e20220281. 1 indexed citations
7.
Dietrich, Mary S., et al.. (2021). The Development, Preliminary Validation, and Clinical Application of the Quick Parenting Assessment. Prevention Science. 23(2). 306–320. 5 indexed citations
8.
Fleckman, Julia M., et al.. (2020). Educating Parents About Corporal Punishment and Effective Discipline: Pediatricians’ Preparedness, Motivation, and Barriers. Academic Pediatrics. 21(1). 149–157. 16 indexed citations
9.
Lorber, Michael F., Tamara Del Vecchio, Amy M. Smith Slep, & Seth J. Scholer. (2018). Normative Trends in Physically Aggressive Behavior: Age-Aggression Curves from 6 to 24 Months. The Journal of Pediatrics. 206. 197–203.e1. 8 indexed citations
10.
Taylor, Catherine A., et al.. (2018). US Pediatricians' Attitudes, Beliefs, and Perceived Injunctive Norms About Spanking. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics. 39(7). 564–572. 12 indexed citations
11.
Donoghue, Elaine A, Dina Lieser, Beth DelConte, et al.. (2017). Quality Early Education and Child Care From Birth to Kindergarten. PEDIATRICS. 140(2). 35 indexed citations
12.
Smith, Ashley, et al.. (2016). Can Discipline Education be Culturally Sensitive?. Maternal and Child Health Journal. 21(1). 177–186. 11 indexed citations
13.
High, Pamela, Perri Klass, Elaine A Donoghue, et al.. (2014). Literacy Promotion: An Essential Component of Primary Care Pediatric Practice. PEDIATRICS. 134(2). 404–409. 194 indexed citations
14.
Dietrich, Mary S., et al.. (2013). The Effect of Primary Care Interventions on Children's Media Viewing Habits and Exposure to Violence. Academic Pediatrics. 13(6). 531–539. 9 indexed citations
15.
Bickman, Leonard, et al.. (2013). A brief intervention affects parents’ attitudes toward using less physical punishment. Child Abuse & Neglect. 37(12). 1192–1201. 50 indexed citations
16.
Dowd, M. Denise, Robert Sege, H. Garry Gardner, et al.. (2012). Firearm-Related Injuries Affecting the Pediatric Population. PEDIATRICS. 130(5). e1416–e1423. 235 indexed citations
17.
Scholer, Seth J., et al.. (2012). Why Parents Value a Brief Required Primary Care Intervention That Teaches Discipline Strategies. Clinical Pediatrics. 51(6). 538–545. 11 indexed citations
18.
Scholer, Seth J., et al.. (2010). A Brief Intervention May Affect Parents' Attitudes Toward Using Less Physical Punishment. Family & Community Health. 33(2). 106–116. 47 indexed citations
19.
Scholer, Seth J.. (1997). Persistently Increased Injury Mortality Rates in High-Risk Young Children. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine. 151(12). 1216–1216. 11 indexed citations
20.
Scholer, Seth J.. (1996). Effect of Health Care System Factors on Test Ordering. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine. 150(11). 1154–1154. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026