This map shows the geographic impact of Sergio Pede's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sergio Pede with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sergio Pede more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sergio Pede. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sergio Pede. The network helps show where Sergio Pede may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sergio Pede
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sergio Pede.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sergio Pede based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Sergio Pede. Sergio Pede is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Palmieri, Luigi, Diego Vanuzzo, Salvatore Panico, et al.. (2005). [Distribution of the global cardiovascular risk in the Italian population: results from the cardiovascular epidemiologic observatory].. PubMed. 6(5). 279–84.1 indexed citations
6.
Pilotto, Lorenza, Cinzia Lo Noce, Francesco Dima, et al.. (2004). Il diabete in Italia: un problema di sanità pubblica. 5(6). 480–486.1 indexed citations
7.
Vanuzzo, Diego, Lorenza Pilotto, Mariagrazia Uguccioni, et al.. (2004). [Cardiovascular epidemiology: trends of risk factors in Italy].. PubMed. 5 Suppl 8. 19S–27S; discussion 33S.6 indexed citations
8.
Verdecchia, Paolo, Peter Sleight, Fausto Avanzini, et al.. (2003). Hypertrophy at ECG and its regression during treatment survey (HEART survey). Rationale, design and baseline characteristics of patients.. PubMed. 4(7). 479–83.4 indexed citations
Pede, Sergio & Mariagrazia Uguccioni. (2001). [AHCPR/AHRQ guidelines. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research and Agency for Health Care Research and Quality].. PubMed. 2 Suppl 1. 60–8.7 indexed citations
Agabiti‐Rosei, Enrico, Ezio Giovannini, Giuseppe Mancia, et al.. (1999). [Arterial hypertension and cardiac pathology. Diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines presented by the Joint Commission of the ANMCO-SIC-SIIA. Assoziane Nazionale Medici Cardiologi Ospedalieri. Società Italiana di Cardiologia. Società Italiana dell'Ipertensione Arteriosa].. PubMed. 29(3). 341–56.2 indexed citations
15.
Agabiti‐Rosei, Enrico, et al.. (1999). Ipertensione arteriosa e patologia cardiaca. Linee guida diagnostico-terapeutiche. La Commissione congiunta Associazione Nazionale Medici Cardiologi Ospedalieri (ANMCO)/Società Italiana di Cardiologia (SIC)/Società Italiana del l'Ipertensione Arteriosa (SIIA).. 44(3). 299–312.3 indexed citations
16.
Agabiti‐Rosei, Enrico, G. Mancia, Salvatore Novo, et al.. (1999). [Arterial hypertension and heart diseases. Diagnostic-therapeutic guidelines. Joint Commission of the National Association of Hospital Cardiologists, the Italian Society of Cardiology and the Italian Society of Arterial Hypertension].. PubMed. 44(3). 299–312.3 indexed citations
17.
Schillaci, Giuseppe, Paolo Verdecchia, Sergio Pede, & Carlo Porcellati. (1998). Electrocardiography for left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertension: time for re-evaluation?. PubMed. 28(6). 706–13.1 indexed citations
18.
Verdecchia, Paolo, Giuseppe Schillaci, Claudia Borgioni, et al.. (1998). Ambulatory Pulse Pressure. Hypertension. 32(6). 983–988.319 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.