Sen Song

13.2k total citations · 6 hit papers
87 papers, 8.4k citations indexed

About

Sen Song is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Sen Song has authored 87 papers receiving a total of 8.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 33 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 24 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 20 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Sen Song's work include Neural dynamics and brain function (24 papers), Advanced Memory and Neural Computing (15 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (13 papers). Sen Song is often cited by papers focused on Neural dynamics and brain function (24 papers), Advanced Memory and Neural Computing (15 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (13 papers). Sen Song collaborates with scholars based in China, United States and United Kingdom. Sen Song's co-authors include Kenneth D. Miller, L. F. Abbott, Sacha B. Nelson, P. Jesper Sjöström, Dmitri B. Chklovskii, L. F. Abbott, Xinke Shen, Shaoyuan Wu, Liang Liu and Scott V. Edwards and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Advanced Materials.

In The Last Decade

Sen Song

86 papers receiving 8.2k citations

Hit Papers

Competitive Hebbian learning through spike-timing-depende... 2000 2026 2008 2017 2000 2005 2016 2019 2019 500 1000 1.5k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sen Song China 32 3.9k 3.8k 3.4k 1.2k 1.0k 87 8.4k
Rodney J. Douglas Switzerland 48 7.8k 2.0× 3.7k 1.0× 5.8k 1.7× 1.5k 1.2× 1.3k 1.3× 135 12.1k
Liam Paninski United States 52 8.5k 2.2× 1.9k 0.5× 5.6k 1.6× 1.7k 1.4× 1.5k 1.5× 163 12.0k
Rodrigo Quian Quiroga United Kingdom 53 9.7k 2.5× 1.1k 0.3× 4.0k 1.2× 912 0.7× 504 0.5× 133 11.8k
Simon J. Thorpe France 50 10.1k 2.6× 3.2k 0.8× 2.7k 0.8× 1.5k 1.2× 574 0.6× 134 12.6k
Claudia Clopath United Kingdom 32 3.2k 0.8× 1.6k 0.4× 2.2k 0.6× 3.1k 2.5× 363 0.4× 106 7.3k
Yang Dan United States 59 10.9k 2.8× 2.7k 0.7× 8.3k 2.4× 647 0.5× 2.0k 2.0× 104 14.6k
Anthony M. Zador United States 47 6.9k 1.8× 979 0.3× 4.6k 1.3× 555 0.5× 1.7k 1.7× 90 9.6k
Jonathan D. Victor United States 55 7.9k 2.0× 683 0.2× 3.3k 1.0× 643 0.5× 1.5k 1.5× 244 10.8k
Sydney S. Cash United States 64 10.5k 2.7× 1.4k 0.4× 5.8k 1.7× 550 0.4× 771 0.8× 306 14.4k
Andreas S. Tolias United States 42 6.0k 1.5× 633 0.2× 3.2k 0.9× 641 0.5× 1.2k 1.2× 93 8.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Sen Song

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sen Song's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sen Song with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sen Song more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sen Song

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sen Song. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sen Song. The network helps show where Sen Song may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sen Song

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sen Song. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sen Song based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sen Song. Sen Song is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Shen, Xinke, et al.. (2025). Dynamic-Attention-Based EEG State Transition Modeling for Emotion Recognition. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing. 16(4). 3552–3568. 1 indexed citations
2.
Shen, Yi, et al.. (2025). Improve Decoding Factuality by Token-wise Cross Layer Entropy of Large Language Models. 3912–3921. 1 indexed citations
3.
Shen, Xinke, et al.. (2024). Contrastive learning of shared spatiotemporal EEG representations across individuals for naturalistic neuroscience. NeuroImage. 301. 120890–120890. 4 indexed citations
4.
Shen, Xinke, et al.. (2024). Unveiling Frequency-Specific Microstate Correlates of Anxiety and Depression Symptoms. Brain Topography. 38(1). 12–12. 4 indexed citations
5.
Yang, Yaxiong, Min Liu, Nan Liu, et al.. (2022). Cytosolic peptides encoding CaV1 C-termini downregulate the calcium channel activity-neuritogenesis coupling. Communications Biology. 5(1). 484–484. 7 indexed citations
6.
Shen, Xinke, Xianggen Liu, Xin Hu, Dan Zhang, & Sen Song. (2022). Contrastive Learning of Subject-Invariant EEG Representations for Cross-Subject Emotion Recognition. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing. 14(3). 2496–2511. 165 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Liu, Xianggen, Yunan Luo, Pengyong Li, Sen Song, & Jian Peng. (2021). Deep geometric representations for modeling effects of mutations on protein-protein binding affinity. PLoS Computational Biology. 17(8). e1009284–e1009284. 81 indexed citations
8.
Li, Xinyi, Jianshi Tang, Qingtian Zhang, et al.. (2020). Power-efficient neural network with artificial dendrites. Nature Nanotechnology. 15(9). 776–782. 209 indexed citations
9.
Chen, Jing, Mingxiu Cheng, Liang Wang, et al.. (2020). A Vagal-NTS Neural Pathway that Stimulates Feeding. Current Biology. 30(20). 3986–3998.e5. 106 indexed citations
10.
Chen, Chenggang, Mingxiu Cheng, Tetsufumi Ito, & Sen Song. (2018). Neuronal Organization in the Inferior Colliculus Revisited with Cell-Type-Dependent Monosynaptic Tracing. Journal of Neuroscience. 38(13). 3318–3332. 52 indexed citations
11.
Zhao, Zhe, Liang Wang, Fei Hu, et al.. (2017). A Central Catecholaminergic Circuit Controls Blood Glucose Levels during Stress. Neuron. 95(1). 138–152.e5. 59 indexed citations
12.
Sümbül, Uygar, Sen Song, Kyle J. McCulloch, et al.. (2014). A genetic and computational approach to structurally classify neuronal types. Nature Communications. 5(1). 3512–3512. 118 indexed citations
13.
Grillo, Federico W., Sen Song, Lieven Huang, et al.. (2013). Increased axonal bouton dynamics in the aging mouse cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 110(16). E1514–23. 98 indexed citations
14.
Canty, Alison J., et al.. (2013). Synaptic Elimination and Protection after Minimal Injury Depend on Cell Type and Their Prelesion Structural Dynamics in the Adult Cerebral Cortex. Journal of Neuroscience. 33(25). 10374–10383. 20 indexed citations
16.
Kepecs, Ádám, Mark C. W. van Rossum, Sen Song, & Jesper Tegnér. (2002). Spike-timing-dependent plasticity: common themes and divergent vistas. Biological Cybernetics. 87(5-6). 446–458. 82 indexed citations
17.
Song, Sen & L. F. Abbott. (2001). Cortical Development and Remapping through Spike Timing-Dependent Plasticity. Neuron. 32(2). 339–350. 356 indexed citations
18.
Song, Sen & L. F. Abbott. (2000). Temporally asymmetric Hebbian learning and neuronal response variability. Neurocomputing. 32-33. 523–528. 6 indexed citations
19.
Abbott, L. F. & Sen Song. (1998). Temporally Asymmetric Hebbian Learning, Spike liming and Neural Response Variability. Neural Information Processing Systems. 11. 69–75. 53 indexed citations
20.
Werger, Barry, et al.. (1997). Multiple agents from the bottom up: the interaction lab's robot competition effort. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 802–803. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026