Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Overfishing reduces resilience of kelp beds to climate-driven catastrophic phase shift
2009451 citationsSD Ling, SD Frusher et al.profile →
Statistical solutions for error and bias in global citizen science datasets
2013375 citationsSimon Wotherspoon, GT Pecl et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of SD Frusher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by SD Frusher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites SD Frusher more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by SD Frusher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by SD Frusher. The network helps show where SD Frusher may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of SD Frusher
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of SD Frusher.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of SD Frusher based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with SD Frusher. SD Frusher is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Frusher, SD, et al.. (2014). TRANSFORMATION OF COASTAL COMMUNITIES: WHERE IS THE MARINE SECTOR HEADING?. Australasian journal of regional studies. 20(2). 286–324.9 indexed citations
8.
Hobday, AJ, Anna K. Farmery, SD Frusher, et al.. (2014). Growth opportunities and critical elements in the supply chain for wild fisheries and aquaculture in a changing climate: a marine NARP project. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).1 indexed citations
9.
Pecl, GT, SD Frusher, & Rebecca Brown. (2010). Developing citizen science as a communication and research tool for monitoring ecological change in the marine environment. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).1 indexed citations
10.
Pecl, GT, AJ Hobday, SD Frusher, & WHH Sauer. (2010). Networking across global marine 'hotspots'. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).1 indexed citations
11.
Frusher, SD, GT Pecl, C Gardner, et al.. (2010). Investigating the impacts of climate change on a lobster fishery: a case study on the Tasmanian east coast lobster fishery. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).1 indexed citations
Frusher, SD, et al.. (2007). Is climate change impacting on lobster stocks in Tasmania?. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).2 indexed citations
Gardner, C, SD Frusher, Malcolm Haddon, & CD Buxton. (2003). Movements of the Southern Rock Lobster Jasus edwardsii in Tasmania, Australia. Bulletin of Marine Science. 73(3). 653–671.46 indexed citations
17.
Gardner, C, et al.. (2002). The 2000/2001 rock lobster assessment. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).1 indexed citations
18.
Frusher, SD, J.R. Prescott, & M. Edmunds. (1999). Southern Rock Lobsters. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).5 indexed citations
Frusher, SD, et al.. (1999). Bycatch in the Tasmanian rock lobster fishery. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.