Scott Pendergast

30 total papers · 1.9k total citations
15 papers, 580 citations indexed

About

Scott Pendergast is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Scott Pendergast has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 580 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Ophthalmology, 9 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 3 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Scott Pendergast's work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (7 papers), Retinal and Macular Surgery (7 papers) and Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (6 papers). Scott Pendergast is often cited by papers focused on Retinal Diseases and Treatments (7 papers), Retinal and Macular Surgery (7 papers) and Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (6 papers). Scott Pendergast collaborates with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Saudi Arabia. Scott Pendergast's co-authors include Raymond R. Margherio, Morton S. Cox, George A. Williams, Brooks W. McCuen, Michael T. Trese, Bruce R. Garretson, T. Hassan, Alan Margherio, Barkur S. Shastry and M. Bruce Shields and has published in prestigious journals such as Ophthalmology, American Journal of Ophthalmology and Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.

In The Last Decade

Scott Pendergast

12 papers receiving 547 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Scott Pendergast 488 469 108 86 24 15 580
Hidenao Ideta 607 1.2× 474 1.0× 99 0.9× 124 1.4× 31 1.3× 28 684
Kulwant Sehmi 508 1.0× 334 0.7× 213 2.0× 85 1.0× 16 0.7× 17 674
J H Dobree 393 0.8× 249 0.5× 69 0.6× 47 0.5× 25 1.0× 23 500
H. Schatz 570 1.2× 268 0.6× 166 1.5× 47 0.5× 24 1.0× 32 693
Jorge I. Calzada 476 1.0× 331 0.7× 95 0.9× 123 1.4× 30 1.3× 31 564
Kimitaka Takami 334 0.7× 197 0.4× 110 1.0× 45 0.5× 18 0.8× 23 587
K. F. Damji 454 0.9× 293 0.6× 95 0.9× 47 0.5× 25 1.0× 18 544
Roelofje J. van der Worp 337 0.7× 334 0.7× 159 1.5× 49 0.6× 12 0.5× 18 516
Masahiko Yokoi 371 0.8× 247 0.5× 69 0.6× 53 0.6× 15 0.6× 26 500
Max Forbes 455 0.9× 271 0.6× 129 1.2× 33 0.4× 39 1.6× 22 604

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Pendergast

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Pendergast's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Pendergast with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Pendergast more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Pendergast

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Pendergast. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Pendergast. The network helps show where Scott Pendergast may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Scott Pendergast

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Scott Pendergast. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Scott Pendergast based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Scott Pendergast. Scott Pendergast is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026