Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Characterisation of nanoplastics during the degradation of polystyrene
2015795 citationsScott Lambert, Martin WagnerChemosphereprofile →
Environmental performance of bio-based and biodegradable plastics: the road ahead
2017602 citationsScott Lambert, Martin WagnerChemical Society Reviewsprofile →
Freshwater Microplastics
2017510 citationsMartin Wagner, Scott LambertThe handbook of environmental chemistryprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Lambert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Lambert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Lambert more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Lambert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Lambert. The network helps show where Scott Lambert may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Scott Lambert
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Scott Lambert.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Scott Lambert based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Scott Lambert. Scott Lambert is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Wagner, Martin & Scott Lambert. (2017). Freshwater Microplastics. The handbook of environmental chemistry.510 indexed citations breakdown →
4.
Lambert, Scott & Martin Wagner. (2017). Environmental performance of bio-based and biodegradable plastics: the road ahead. Chemical Society Reviews. 46(22). 6855–6871.602 indexed citations breakdown →
Lambert, Scott & Martin Wagner. (2015). Characterisation of nanoplastics during the degradation of polystyrene. Chemosphere. 145. 265–268.795 indexed citations breakdown →
Lambert, Scott, Stephen B. Monsen, & Nancy L. Shaw. (2011). Notice of release of Mountain Home germplasm Sandberg bluegrass (selected germplasm, natural track).3 indexed citations
13.
Olwell, Peggy, et al.. (2010). An introduction to the Colorado Plateau Native Plant Initiative. 62. 8–13.2 indexed citations
14.
Shaw, Nancy L., et al.. (2005). Increasing Native Forb Seed Supplies for the Great Basin. 35.30 indexed citations
15.
Lambert, Scott. (2005). SEEDING CONSIDERATIONS IN RESTORING BIG SAGEBRUSH HABITAT. 38. 75–80.12 indexed citations
16.
Tiedemann, Arthur R., et al.. (1997). 'Umatilla' snow buckwheat for rangeland restoration in the interior Pacific Northwest. UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona). 19(3). 22–25.2 indexed citations
Lambert, Scott, et al.. (1993). Black-tailed jackrabbit preferences for eight forages used for reclamation of Great Basin rangelands.. Northwest Science. 67(4). 246–250.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.