Scott H. Seidman
- Neurology top 1%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 2%
- Ophthalmology top 2%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Co-authors
- Gary D. PaigeLaura TelfordRichard LeighR. John LeighGareth R. BarnesMichael P. GrantVallabh E. DasWilliam P. Huebner
- Topics
- Vestibular and auditory disorders (24 papers)Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (19 papers)Visual perception and processing mechanisms (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Scott H. Seidman
31 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Neurology 794
- Cognitive Neuroscience 512
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 478
- Ophthalmology 276
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 121
Countries citing papers authored by Scott H. Seidman
This map shows the geographic impact of Scott H. Seidman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott H. Seidman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott H. Seidman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Scott H. Seidman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott H. Seidman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott H. Seidman. The network helps show where Scott H. Seidman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Scott H. Seidman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Scott H. Seidman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Scott H. Seidman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Scott H. Seidman. Scott H. Seidman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 25 | |
| 4 | 14 | |
| 5 | 32 | |
| 6 | 21 | |
| 7 | 62 | |
| 8 | 41 | |
| 9 | 74 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 24 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | Loss of ipsidirectional quick phases of torsional nystagmus with a unilateral midbrain lesion. | 12 |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 36 | |
| 16 | 14 | |
| 17 | 26 | |
| 18 | 11 | |
| 19 | 48 | |
| 20 | 46 |
About Scott H. Seidman
Scott H. Seidman is a scholar working on Neurology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Ophthalmology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vestibular and auditory disorders (24 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (19 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (794 citations), Ophthalmology (276 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (512 citations). Scott H. Seidman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Gary D. Paige, Laura Telford, Richard Leigh, R. John Leigh, Gareth R. Barnes, Michael P. Grant, Vallabh E. Das, William P. Huebner, Louis F. Dell’Osso and Alfred O. DiScenna. Their work appears in journals such as Brain, Journal of Neurophysiology and Brain Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.