Scott Glancy

5.0k total citations · 3 hit papers
39 papers, 2.1k citations indexed

About

Scott Glancy is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Scott Glancy has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 2.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 35 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 34 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 3 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Recurrent topics in Scott Glancy's work include Quantum Information and Cryptography (33 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (21 papers) and Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (16 papers). Scott Glancy is often cited by papers focused on Quantum Information and Cryptography (33 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (21 papers) and Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (16 papers). Scott Glancy collaborates with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Australia. Scott Glancy's co-authors include Emanuel Knill, Timothy C. Ralph, H. M. Vasconcelos, G. J. Milburn, William J. Munro, Alexei Gilchrist, D. Leibfried, Ting Rei Tan, Yong Wan and Adam C. Keith and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and Physical Review Letters.

In The Last Decade

Scott Glancy

38 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Hit Papers

Quantum computation with optical coherent states 2003 2026 2010 2018 2003 2016 2021 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Scott Glancy United States 18 1.9k 1.8k 301 82 44 39 2.1k
Borivoje Dakić Austria 15 1.8k 1.0× 2.0k 1.1× 235 0.8× 140 1.7× 44 1.0× 42 2.2k
Pavel Lougovski United States 19 1.1k 0.6× 1.2k 0.7× 279 0.9× 50 0.6× 40 0.9× 45 1.5k
Quntao Zhuang United States 23 1.3k 0.7× 1.4k 0.8× 241 0.8× 92 1.1× 33 0.8× 98 1.7k
E. Jeffrey United States 16 1.6k 0.9× 1.5k 0.8× 349 1.2× 86 1.0× 38 0.9× 41 1.9k
Joseph B. Altepeter United States 17 1.5k 0.8× 1.5k 0.8× 235 0.8× 82 1.0× 27 0.6× 47 1.7k
Pavel Sekatski Switzerland 24 1.7k 0.9× 1.6k 0.9× 217 0.7× 162 2.0× 19 0.4× 84 1.9k
János A. Bergou United States 30 2.1k 1.1× 2.1k 1.2× 271 0.9× 143 1.7× 50 1.1× 106 2.5k
N. Imoto Japan 18 1.6k 0.8× 1.3k 0.7× 472 1.6× 69 0.8× 17 0.4× 40 1.8k
Zaki Leghtas France 20 2.8k 1.5× 2.8k 1.6× 303 1.0× 191 2.3× 87 2.0× 37 3.3k
Jonas Bylander Sweden 20 1.5k 0.8× 1.2k 0.6× 294 1.0× 89 1.1× 43 1.0× 48 1.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Glancy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Glancy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Glancy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Glancy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Glancy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Glancy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Glancy. The network helps show where Scott Glancy may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Scott Glancy

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Scott Glancy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Scott Glancy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Scott Glancy. Scott Glancy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hou, Pan‐Yu, Daniel C. Cole, Scott Glancy, et al.. (2024). Coherent coupling and non-destructive measurement of trapped-ion mechanical oscillators. Nature Physics. 20(10). 1636–1641. 12 indexed citations
2.
Young, Aaron W., William J. Eckner, Nathan Schine, et al.. (2024). An atomic boson sampler. Nature. 629(8011). 311–316. 16 indexed citations
3.
Shojaee, Ezad, et al.. (2023). Constraints on Gaussian error channels and measurements for quantum communication. Physical review. A. 107(4). 3 indexed citations
4.
Knill, Emanuel, et al.. (2023). Multi-mode Gaussian state analysis with total-photon counting. Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics. 56(14). 145501–145501. 2 indexed citations
5.
Kotler, Shlomi, G. A. Peterson, Ezad Shojaee, et al.. (2021). Direct observation of deterministic macroscopic entanglement. Science. 372(6542). 622–625. 184 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Glancy, Scott, et al.. (2018). Quadrature histograms in maximum-likelihood quantum state tomography. Physical review. A. 98(2). 4 indexed citations
7.
Keith, Adam C., Charles H. Baldwin, Scott Glancy, & Emanuel Knill. (2018). Joint quantum-state and measurement tomography with incomplete measurements. Physical review. A. 98(4). 22 indexed citations
8.
Glancy, Scott, et al.. (2017). Investigating bias in maximum-likelihood quantum-state tomography. Physical review. A. 95(2). 12 indexed citations
9.
Gaebler, John, Ting Rei Tan, Yiheng Lin, et al.. (2016). High Fidelity Universal Gate Set for 9Be+ Ion Qubits | NIST. Physical Review Letters. 2 indexed citations
10.
Lin, Yiheng, John Gaebler, Florentin Reiter, et al.. (2016). Preparation of Entangled States through Hilbert Space Engineering. Physical Review Letters. 117(14). 140502–140502. 29 indexed citations
11.
Gaebler, John, Ting Rei Tan, Yiheng Lin, et al.. (2016). High-Fidelity Universal Gate Set forBe9+Ion Qubits. Physical Review Letters. 117(6). 60505–60505. 365 indexed citations breakdown →
12.
Knill, Emanuel, Scott Glancy, Sae Woo Nam, Kevin J. Coakley, & Yanbao Zhang. (2015). Bell inequalities for continuously emitting sources. Physical Review A. 91(3). 7 indexed citations
13.
Ku, H. S., William Kindel, F. Mallet, et al.. (2015). Generating and verifying entangled itinerant microwave fields with efficient and independent measurements. Physical Review A. 91(4). 13 indexed citations
14.
Zhang, Yanbao, Scott Glancy, & Emanuel Knill. (2013). Efficient quantification of experimental evidence against local realism | NIST. Physical Review Letters. 1 indexed citations
15.
Zhang, Yanbao, Scott Glancy, & Emanuel Knill. (2011). Asymptotically Optimal Confidences for Rejecting Local Realism | NIST. Physical Review A. 84(6). 1 indexed citations
16.
Gerrits, Thomas, Martin J. Stevens, Burm Baek, et al.. (2011). Generation of degenerate, factorizable, pulsed squeezed light at telecom wavelengths. Optics Express. 19(24). 24434–24434. 41 indexed citations
17.
Mallet, F., Manuel Castellanos-Beltran, H. S. Ku, et al.. (2011). Quantum State Tomography of an Itinerant Squeezed Microwave Field. Physical Review Letters. 106(22). 220502–220502. 141 indexed citations
18.
Gerrits, Thomas, Scott Glancy, & Sae Woo Nam. (2011). A balanced homodyne detector and local oscillator shaping for measuring optical Schrödinger cat states. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 8033. 80330X–80330X. 2 indexed citations
19.
Gerrits, Thomas, Scott Glancy, Tracy S. Clement, et al.. (2010). Generation of optical Schr\"odinger cat states by number-resolved photon subtraction from squeezed vacuum. arXiv (Cornell University). 1 indexed citations
20.
Knill, Emanuel & Scott Glancy. (2006). Error analysis for encoding a qubit in an oscillator (5 pages). Physical Review A. 73(1). 12325–54. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026