Satoshi Shizuta
About
In The Last Decade
Satoshi Shizuta
89 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 1.2k
- Molecular Biology 596
- Surgery 540
- Cancer Research 364
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 339
Countries citing papers authored by Satoshi Shizuta
This map shows the geographic impact of Satoshi Shizuta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Satoshi Shizuta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Satoshi Shizuta more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Satoshi Shizuta
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Satoshi Shizuta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Satoshi Shizuta. The network helps show where Satoshi Shizuta may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Satoshi Shizuta
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Satoshi Shizuta. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Satoshi Shizuta based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Satoshi Shizuta. Satoshi Shizuta is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.