Sarah Tune

1.0k total citations
23 papers, 481 citations indexed

About

Sarah Tune is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah Tune has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 481 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 5 papers in Social Psychology and 5 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Sarah Tune's work include Neural dynamics and brain function (8 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (6 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (6 papers). Sarah Tune is often cited by papers focused on Neural dynamics and brain function (8 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (6 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (6 papers). Sarah Tune collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Australia. Sarah Tune's co-authors include Jonas Obleser, Ina Bornkessel‐Schlesewsky, Leonhard Waschke, Matthias Schlesewsky, Mohsen Alavash, Malte Wöstmann, Franziska Kretzschmar, Dietmar Roehm, Luming Wang and Salomi S. Asaridou and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Communications and Journal of Neuroscience.

In The Last Decade

Sarah Tune

22 papers receiving 478 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sarah Tune Germany 13 405 99 95 66 27 23 481
Horst M. Mueller Germany 5 441 1.1× 96 1.0× 69 0.7× 60 0.9× 28 1.0× 6 492
Amy Price United States 6 375 0.9× 106 1.1× 51 0.5× 92 1.4× 16 0.6× 8 431
Terri L. Scott United States 7 301 0.7× 136 1.4× 65 0.7× 50 0.8× 31 1.1× 13 363
Sung-Joo Lim United States 10 346 0.9× 111 1.1× 162 1.7× 19 0.3× 33 1.2× 15 454
Sara Guediche United States 11 262 0.6× 55 0.6× 132 1.4× 27 0.4× 14 0.5× 20 358
Irina Simanova Netherlands 11 311 0.8× 97 1.0× 95 1.0× 112 1.7× 23 0.9× 13 478
Hyeon‐Ae Jeon South Korea 10 270 0.7× 91 0.9× 54 0.6× 48 0.7× 26 1.0× 25 380
Mónica Lindı́n Spain 15 439 1.1× 110 1.1× 115 1.2× 61 0.9× 10 0.4× 42 549
Jona Sassenhagen Germany 13 703 1.7× 245 2.5× 209 2.2× 87 1.3× 60 2.2× 19 817

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Tune

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Tune's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Tune with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Tune more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Tune

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Tune. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Tune. The network helps show where Sarah Tune may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Tune

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Tune. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Tune based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Tune. Sarah Tune is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Bunzeck, Nico, Tineke K. Steiger, Ulrike M. Krämer, et al.. (2023). Trajectories and contributing factors of neural compensation in healthy and pathological aging. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 156. 105489–105489. 9 indexed citations
3.
Tune, Sarah, et al.. (2023). Neural α Oscillations and Pupil Size Differentially Index Cognitive Demand under Competing Audiovisual Task Conditions. Journal of Neuroscience. 43(23). 4352–4364. 9 indexed citations
4.
Tune, Sarah, et al.. (2021). Unilateral Acoustic Degradation Delays Attentional Separation of Competing Speech. Trends in Hearing. 25. 1851326586–1851326586. 12 indexed citations
5.
Erb, Julia, et al.. (2021). Predicting speech from a cortical hierarchy of event-based time scales. Science Advances. 7(49). eabi6070–eabi6070. 24 indexed citations
6.
Alavash, Mohsen, Sarah Tune, & Jonas Obleser. (2021). Dynamic large-scale connectivity of intrinsic cortical oscillations supports adaptive listening in challenging conditions. PLoS Biology. 19(10). e3001410–e3001410. 7 indexed citations
7.
Tune, Sarah, Mohsen Alavash, Lorenz Fiedler, & Jonas Obleser. (2021). Neural attentional-filter mechanisms of listening success in middle-aged and older individuals. Nature Communications. 12(1). 4533–4533. 24 indexed citations
8.
Obleser, Jonas, et al.. (2021). Circadian fluctuations in glucocorticoid level predict perceptual discrimination sensitivity. iScience. 24(4). 102345–102345. 8 indexed citations
9.
Jessen, Sarah, Jonas Obleser, & Sarah Tune. (2021). Neural tracking in infants – An analytical tool for multisensory social processing in development. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. 52. 101034–101034. 18 indexed citations
11.
Kreitewolf, Jens, Malte Wöstmann, Sarah Tune, Michael Plöchl, & Jonas Obleser. (2019). Working-memory disruption by task-irrelevant talkers depends on degree of talker familiarity. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 81(4). 1108–1118. 7 indexed citations
12.
Tune, Sarah, Malte Wöstmann, & Jonas Obleser. (2018). Probing the limits of alpha power lateralisation as a neural marker of selective attention in middle‐aged and older listeners. European Journal of Neuroscience. 48(7). 2537–2550. 37 indexed citations
13.
Alavash, Mohsen, Sarah Tune, & Jonas Obleser. (2018). Modular reconfiguration of an auditory control brain network supports adaptive listening behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 116(2). 660–669. 40 indexed citations
14.
Tune, Sarah, et al.. (2016). The neurobiology of language: Relevance to linguistics. Pressto (Uniwersytetu Adama Mickiewicza). 2(1). 49–66. 3 indexed citations
15.
Tune, Sarah, et al.. (2016). Disruption of calcitonin gene-related peptide signaling accelerates muscle denervation and dampens cytotoxic neuroinflammation in SOD1 mutant mice. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 74(2). 339–358. 17 indexed citations
16.
Tune, Sarah & Salomi S. Asaridou. (2016). Stimulating the Semantic Network: What Can TMS Tell Us about the Roles of the Posterior Middle Temporal Gyrus and Angular Gyrus?. Journal of Neuroscience. 36(16). 4405–4407. 18 indexed citations
17.
Tune, Sarah, Matthias Schlesewsky, Arne Nagels, Steven L. Small, & Ina Bornkessel‐Schlesewsky. (2016). Sentence understanding depends on contextual use of semantic and real world knowledge. NeuroImage. 136. 10–25. 6 indexed citations
18.
Tune, Sarah, Matthias Schlesewsky, Steven L. Small, et al.. (2014). Cross-linguistic variation in the neurophysiological response to semantic processing: Evidence from anomalies at the borderline of awareness. Neuropsychologia. 56. 147–166. 12 indexed citations
19.
20.
Bornkessel‐Schlesewsky, Ina, Franziska Kretzschmar, Sarah Tune, et al.. (2010). Think globally: Cross-linguistic variation in electrophysiological activity during sentence comprehension. Brain and Language. 117(3). 133–152. 97 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026