Sarah Toner

714 total citations
14 papers, 528 citations indexed

About

Sarah Toner is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Cognitive Neuroscience and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah Toner has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 528 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in General Health Professions, 6 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 5 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Sarah Toner's work include Mental Health and Patient Involvement (6 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (4 papers) and Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (3 papers). Sarah Toner is often cited by papers focused on Mental Health and Patient Involvement (6 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (4 papers) and Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (3 papers). Sarah Toner collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Portugal. Sarah Toner's co-authors include Stefan Priebe, Robert W. McCarley, Martha E. Shenton, Kiyoto Kasai, Toshiaki Onitsuka, Ferenc A. Jólesz, Ron Kikinis, Dean F. Salisbury, Deborah Yurgelun‐Todd and Paul G. Nestor and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Psychological Science and Schizophrenia Research.

In The Last Decade

Sarah Toner

14 papers receiving 517 citations

Peers

Sarah Toner
Sarah Toner
Citations per year, relative to Sarah Toner Sarah Toner (= 1×) peers Victoria Villalta‐Gil

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Toner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Toner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Toner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Toner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Toner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Toner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Toner. The network helps show where Sarah Toner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Toner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Toner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Toner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Toner. Sarah Toner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
1.
Costa, Mariana Pinto da, et al.. (2022). Stakeholders’ views on volunteering in mental health: an international focus group study. BMJ Open. 12(3). e052185–e052185. 6 indexed citations
2.
Costa, Mariana Pinto da, et al.. (2019). How would patients with psychosis like to be in contact with a volunteer: Face-to-face or digitally?. PLoS ONE. 14(5). e0216929–e0216929. 9 indexed citations
3.
Gastaldon, Chiara, Sarah Toner, Federico Tedeschi, et al.. (2019). Are trials of psychological and psychosocial interventions for schizophrenia and psychosis included in the NICE guidelines pragmatic? A systematic review. PLoS ONE. 14(9). e0222891–e0222891. 12 indexed citations
4.
Toner, Sarah, et al.. (2018). Characteristics and motivations of volunteers providing one-to-one support for people with mental illness: a survey in Austria. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 53(8). 841–847. 15 indexed citations
5.
Toner, Sarah, Lauren M. Hickling, Mariana Pinto da Costa, Megan Cassidy, & Stefan Priebe. (2018). Characteristics, motivations and experiences of volunteer befrienders for people with mental illness: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. BMC Psychiatry. 18(1). 378–378. 19 indexed citations
6.
Toner, Sarah, et al.. (2018). Preferences for befriending schemes: a survey of patients with severe mental illness. BMC Psychiatry. 18(1). 64–64. 12 indexed citations
7.
Toner, Sarah, et al.. (2018). Attitudes towards severe mental illness and social distance: A survey of volunteer befrienders in Austria. International Journal of Social Psychiatry. 64(5). 470–475. 9 indexed citations
8.
Toner, Sarah, et al.. (2018). Conceptualizing resilience in adult mental health literature: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice. 92(3). 299–341. 70 indexed citations
9.
Dickey, Chandlee C., I Mórocz, Margaret Niznikiewicz, et al.. (2008). Auditory processing abnormalities in schizotypal personality disorder: An fMRI experiment using tones of deviant pitch and duration. Schizophrenia Research. 103(1-3). 26–39. 20 indexed citations
10.
Onitsuka, Toshiaki, Martha E. Shenton, Kiyoto Kasai, et al.. (2003). Fusiform Gyrus Volume Reduction and Facial Recognition in Chronic Schizophrenia. Archives of General Psychiatry. 60(4). 349–349. 115 indexed citations
11.
Kasai, Kiyoto, Martha E. Shenton, Dean F. Salisbury, et al.. (2003). Differences and Similarities in Insular and Temporal Pole MRI Gray Matter Volume Abnormalities in First-Episode Schizophrenia and Affective Psychosis. Archives of General Psychiatry. 60(11). 1069–1069. 150 indexed citations
12.
Dickey, Chandlee C., Robert W. McCarley, Martina M. Voglmaier, et al.. (2003). A MRI study of fusiform gyrus in schizotypal personality disorder. Schizophrenia Research. 64(1). 35–39. 16 indexed citations
13.
14.
Seamon, John G., et al.. (2002). Thinking of Critical Words During Study Is Unnecessary for False Memory in the Deese, Roediger, and McDermott Procedure. Psychological Science. 13(6). 526–531. 50 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026