Sarah Thomas

439 total citations
10 papers, 244 citations indexed

About

Sarah Thomas is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah Thomas has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 244 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Social Psychology, 2 papers in Clinical Psychology and 2 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in Sarah Thomas's work include Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (1 paper), Landslides and related hazards (1 paper) and earthquake and tectonic studies (1 paper). Sarah Thomas is often cited by papers focused on Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (1 paper), Landslides and related hazards (1 paper) and earthquake and tectonic studies (1 paper). Sarah Thomas collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Sarah Thomas's co-authors include Graeme D. Ruxton, Simon Pervan, Peter Nuttall, Megan D. Gall, Esteban Fernández‐Juricic, Courtney Hughes, Catherine M. Hill, Nik Taylor, Alicia Said and Jenny Anne Glikman and has published in prestigious journals such as Animal Behaviour, Frontiers in Psychology and Journal of Zoology.

In The Last Decade

Sarah Thomas

9 papers receiving 231 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Sarah Thomas United Kingdom	6	116	60	43	34	32	10	244
Shari L. Rodriguez United States	8	154 1.3×	77 1.3×	74 1.7×	16 0.5×	17 0.5×	21	325
Andrew W. Don Carlos United States	5	179 1.5×	71 1.2×	39 0.9×	17 0.5×	42 1.3×	9	287
Steven Broad United Kingdom	8	121 1.0×	26 0.4×	59 1.4×	22 0.6×	14 0.4×	9	222
Lesley Evans Ogden United States	9	100 0.9×	23 0.4×	50 1.2×	36 1.1×	35 1.1×	49	248
Anita Kar Yan Wan China	10	151 1.3×	38 0.6×	34 0.8×	20 0.6×	52 1.6×	12	346
Heidi E. Kretser United States	10	184 1.6×	45 0.8×	128 3.0×	29 0.9×	31 1.0×	33	354
Adam P. A. Cardilini Australia	10	171 1.5×	56 0.9×	23 0.5×	70 2.1×	11 0.3×	35	289
Jeff R. Muntifering United States	10	248 2.1×	61 1.0×	37 0.9×	21 0.6×	48 1.5×	17	322
Shashank Poudel Nepal	9	222 1.9×	46 0.8×	65 1.5×	35 1.0×	17 0.5×	15	310
Christine Browne‐Nuñez United States	6	213 1.8×	38 0.6×	57 1.3×	16 0.5×	20 0.6×	10	285

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Thomas

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Thomas

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Thomas. The network helps show where Sarah Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Thomas

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Thomas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Thomas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Thomas. Sarah Thomas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Thomas, Sarah, et al.. (2023). Children’s social emotional competence in Pakistan and Sweden: Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Social Competence Scale (teacher edition). Frontiers in Psychology. 13. 1020963–1020963. 2 indexed citations

2.

Johnson, Brian F. G., et al.. (2023). Evaluating the AZA Framework for Zoo and Aquarium Social Science Research: A Review and Analysis of Relevant Literature 2011–2019. 15–34. 1 indexed citations

3.

Thomas, Sarah, et al.. (2022). Sharing the Field: Reflections of More-Than-Human Field/work Encounters. GeoHumanities. 8(2). 555–585. 9 indexed citations

4.

James, P. A., et al.. (2021). Response to Birdsey (2020) “I don’t wanna be mad and sad”: Using individual systemic therapy to help manage anger and low mood in an adult with a learning disability. British Journal of Learning Disabilities. 49(2). 191–194. 1 indexed citations

5.

Brown, J., et al.. (2018). Understanding Slope Instability on the East Nile Delta – A Case Study. Offshore Technology Conference. 1 indexed citations

6.

Thomas, Sarah. (2018). Weathered: cultures of climate. Green Letters. 22(3). 324–339. 30 indexed citations

7.

Rust, Niki, Amber Abrams, Daniel W. S. Challender, et al.. (2017). Quantity Does Not Always Mean Quality: The Importance of Qualitative Social Science in Conservation Research. Society & Natural Resources. 30(10). 1304–1310. 77 indexed citations

8.

Fernández‐Juricic, Esteban, et al.. (2011). Visual systems and vigilance behaviour of two ground-foraging avian prey species: white-crowned sparrows and California towhees. Animal Behaviour. 81(4). 705–713. 33 indexed citations

9.

Thomas, Sarah, Simon Pervan, & Peter Nuttall. (2009). Marketing orientation and arts organisations: the case for business sponsorship. Marketing Intelligence & Planning. 27(6). 736–752. 22 indexed citations

10.

Ruxton, Graeme D., et al.. (2002). Bells reduce predation of wildlife by domestic cats (Felis catus). Journal of Zoology. 256(1). 81–83. 68 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact