Sarah Porter

29 papers receiving 482 citations

Peers

Sarah Porter
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Infectious Diseases 123
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 37
  • Computer Science Applications 30
  • Library and Information Sciences 7
  • General Health Professions 94
Replace Lucy Annang Ingram with:
Lucy Annang Ingram United States
Hanani Tabana South Africa
Leonardo Villani Italy
Siddharudha Shivalli India
Lucinda Manda‐Taylor Malawi
Nicole Schmidt Switzerland
Natasha Sobers Barbados
Dianah Rhoda Nassozi Uganda
Anushka Aqil United States
Azwihangwisi Helen Mavhandu‐Mudzusi South Africa
Sarah Porter relative to Lucy Annang Ingram United States Lucy Annang Ingram's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
Lucy Annang Ingram · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Porter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Porter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Porter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Porter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Porter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Porter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Porter. The network helps show where Sarah Porter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sarah Porter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sarah Porter Line = papers co-authored together Sarah Porter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202288
2 201978
3 201248
4 201133
5
To MOOC or Not to MOOC: How Can Online Learning Help to Build the Future of Higher Education?
201530
6 201325
7 201321
8 200420
9 201518
10 201817
11 201615
12 201814
13 201313
14 201911
15 20249
16 20169
17 20187
18 20166
19 20235
20 20145

About Sarah Porter

Sarah Porter is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Infectious Diseases, Sociology and Political Science, Epidemiology and General Health Professions, having authored 31 papers that have together received 503 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (4 papers), Radioactive contamination and transfer (2 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (2 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (2 papers), Australian History and Society (1 paper), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (1 paper), Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes (1 paper) and Sex work and related issues (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Infectious Diseases (123 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (37 citations), Computer Science Applications (30 citations), Library and Information Sciences (7 citations) and General Health Professions (94 citations). Sarah Porter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Shigeko Horiuchi, Karen W. Hoover, Mariko Iida, Theresa Ann Sipe, Kaitlin Forsberg, Julia B. DeLuca, Erin L. P. Bradley, Emiko Kamitani, Yaeko Kataoka and Sachiko Kita. Their work appears in journals such as New Review of Academic Librarianship, Medical Education, The Bottom Line Managing Library Finances, Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice and International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact