Sarah Mitchell

1.8k total citations
57 papers, 817 citations indexed

About

Sarah Mitchell is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah Mitchell has authored 57 papers receiving a total of 817 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 30 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 18 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 17 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Sarah Mitchell's work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (30 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (17 papers) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (10 papers). Sarah Mitchell is often cited by papers focused on Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (30 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (17 papers) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (10 papers). Sarah Mitchell collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and New Zealand. Sarah Mitchell's co-authors include Jeremy Dale, Jane Coad, Anne‐Marie Slowther, Adrian Plunkett, Clare Gardiner, Andrew Morris, Karina Bennett, Heather Jebbari, Agnieszka Broda and Francis Drobniewski and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Intensive Care Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Sarah Mitchell

53 papers receiving 795 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sarah Mitchell United Kingdom 16 418 258 168 153 120 57 817
Gabriel T. Bosslet United States 14 517 1.2× 167 0.6× 430 2.6× 228 1.5× 149 1.2× 46 1.0k
Eric L. Krakauer United States 20 840 2.0× 242 0.9× 375 2.2× 123 0.8× 287 2.4× 66 1.1k
Karen Dryden‐Palmer Canada 13 273 0.7× 247 1.0× 262 1.6× 178 1.2× 109 0.9× 34 727
Louise Hanvey Canada 12 412 1.0× 156 0.6× 212 1.3× 126 0.8× 111 0.9× 26 696
Elizabeth Dzeng United States 14 532 1.3× 112 0.4× 348 2.1× 113 0.7× 114 0.9× 42 730
Patricia Nicholson Australia 14 240 0.6× 95 0.4× 197 1.2× 107 0.7× 116 1.0× 37 565
Mary Faith Marshall United States 13 262 0.6× 117 0.5× 238 1.4× 45 0.3× 72 0.6× 35 640
Hanne Aagaard Denmark 14 200 0.5× 536 2.1× 171 1.0× 172 1.1× 163 1.4× 33 952
Sarah Neill United Kingdom 17 99 0.2× 282 1.1× 297 1.8× 227 1.5× 156 1.3× 56 806
Carolyn Mackintosh United Kingdom 14 170 0.4× 143 0.6× 300 1.8× 80 0.5× 96 0.8× 39 996

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Mitchell. The network helps show where Sarah Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Mitchell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Mitchell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Mitchell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Mitchell. Sarah Mitchell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Dale, Jeremy, et al.. (2024). An interpretative qualitative case study of a Compassionate Cities initiative in the United Kingdom: Lessons for implementation in other settings. Palliative & Supportive Care. 22(6). 2077–2083. 1 indexed citations
3.
Greenhalgh, Christine, Greg Williams, Annie Harrison, et al.. (2023). Modified realist evaluation of a complex, multi-centred, multi-intervention programme. Journal of Public Health. 45(Supplement_1). i5–i9. 1 indexed citations
4.
Eccles, Abi, Jeremy Dale, Kathryn Almack, et al.. (2023). The impact of Covid-19 pandemic on hospices: A systematic integrated review and synthesis of recommendations for policy and practice. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4. 23–23. 1 indexed citations
5.
Mitchell, Sarah, Alexandra Macmillan, Kate C. Morgaine, & Patricia Priest. (2023). Transdisciplinary stakeholder understandings of antimicrobial resistance: An integrative approach in Aotearoa New Zealand. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 47(6). 100093–100093. 4 indexed citations
6.
Mayland, Catriona R, et al.. (2023). Understanding patient views and experiences of the IDENTIfication of PALLiative care needs (IDENTI-PALL): a qualitative interview study. British Journal of General Practice. 74(739). e88–e95. 2 indexed citations
7.
Eccles, Abi, Jeremy Dale, Kathryn Almack, et al.. (2022). The impact of Covid-19 pandemic on hospices: A systematic integrated review and synthesis of recommendations for policy and practice. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4. 23–23. 2 indexed citations
9.
Dale, Jeremy, Sarah Mitchell, Claire Ferguson, et al.. (2022). Communication of palliative care needs in discharge letters from hospice providers to primary care: a multisite sequential explanatory mixed methods study. BMC Palliative Care. 21(1). 155–155. 4 indexed citations
10.
MacArtney, John, Abi Eccles, Jeremy Dale, et al.. (2021). What do we know about the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on hospices? A collaborative multi-stakeholder knowledge synthesis. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3. 23–23. 2 indexed citations
11.
Mitchell, Sarah, Madeleine Harrison, Phillip Oliver, et al.. (2021). Service change and innovation in community end-of-life care during the COVID-19 pandemic: Qualitative analysis of a nationwide primary care survey. Palliative Medicine. 36(1). 161–170. 13 indexed citations
12.
Mitchell, Sarah, et al.. (2021). Experiences of general practice of children with complex and palliative care needs and their families: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 11(1). e041476–e041476. 5 indexed citations
13.
Mitchell, Sarah, Phillip Oliver, Clare Gardiner, et al.. (2021). Community end-of-life care during the COVID-19 pandemic: findings of a UK primary care survey. BJGP Open. 5(4). BJGPO.2021.0095–BJGPO.2021.0095. 35 indexed citations
15.
Mitchell, Sarah, et al.. (2020). GP home visits: essential patient care or disposable relic?. British Journal of General Practice. 70(695). 306–307. 10 indexed citations
16.
Mitchell, Sarah, Anne‐Marie Slowther, Jane Coad, & Jeremy Dale. (2020). Experiences of healthcare, including palliative care, of children with life-limiting and life-threatening conditions and their families: a longitudinal qualitative investigation. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 106(6). 570–576. 23 indexed citations
19.
Mitchell, Sarah, et al.. (2017). Specialist paediatric palliative care services: what are the benefits?. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 102(10). 923–929. 48 indexed citations
20.
Smith, Marianne, et al.. (1998). From the rural midwest to the rural southeast: Evaluation of the generalizability of a successful geriatric mental health training program.. Iowa Research Online (The University of Iowa). 4(1). 125–138. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026