Sarah Kirk

2.7k total citations · 1 hit paper
17 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

Sarah Kirk is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Small Animals and Applied Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah Kirk has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 4 papers in Small Animals and 3 papers in Applied Psychology. Recurrent topics in Sarah Kirk's work include Animal testing and alternatives (4 papers), Family Support in Illness (3 papers) and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (2 papers). Sarah Kirk is often cited by papers focused on Animal testing and alternatives (4 papers), Family Support in Illness (3 papers) and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (2 papers). Sarah Kirk collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Sweden. Sarah Kirk's co-authors include Sharon Danoff‐Burg, Annette L. Stanton, Christine L. Cameron, Lisa A. Sworowski, Michelle Bishop, Robert K. Twillman, C. A. Collins, Charlotte Collins, Jennifer L. Austenfeld and Jane Stewart and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Sarah Kirk

17 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Hit Papers

Emotionally expressive coping predicts psychological and ... 2000 2026 2008 2017 2000 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sarah Kirk United Kingdom 12 746 745 522 453 329 17 2.0k
Christine L. Cameron United States 11 701 0.9× 928 1.2× 481 0.9× 489 1.1× 372 1.1× 14 2.2k
Michael Hoerger United States 29 412 0.6× 706 0.9× 455 0.9× 282 0.6× 371 1.1× 102 2.4k
Thomas V. Merluzzi United States 28 521 0.7× 1.0k 1.4× 988 1.9× 718 1.6× 372 1.1× 78 3.0k
Nima Moghaddam United Kingdom 24 435 0.6× 1.3k 1.8× 218 0.4× 285 0.6× 346 1.1× 111 2.4k
Lisa M. Jaremka United States 23 747 1.0× 548 0.7× 289 0.6× 374 0.8× 186 0.6× 45 2.2k
Sharon R. Sears United States 15 254 0.3× 686 0.9× 422 0.8× 318 0.7× 246 0.7× 22 1.5k
Susan Bauer‐Wu United States 20 338 0.5× 510 0.7× 398 0.8× 306 0.7× 118 0.4× 50 1.8k
Erin L. Merz United States 17 399 0.5× 484 0.6× 140 0.3× 295 0.7× 150 0.5× 36 1.4k
Stephen Strack United States 22 681 0.9× 1.5k 2.0× 118 0.2× 363 0.8× 525 1.6× 61 2.6k
Michael J. MacKenzie United States 26 388 0.5× 1.7k 2.3× 164 0.3× 379 0.8× 79 0.2× 72 2.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Kirk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Kirk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Kirk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Kirk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Kirk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Kirk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Kirk. The network helps show where Sarah Kirk may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Kirk

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Kirk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Kirk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Kirk. Sarah Kirk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Greasley, Peter J., Nikhil Agrawal, Magnus Althage, et al.. (2024). #1003 Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of multiple ascending doses of AZD2373, an antisense oligonucleotide targeting APOL1. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. 39(Supplement_1). 1 indexed citations
2.
Milliken, Philip H., Mike Aylott, Steven K. Engle, et al.. (2020). Evaluating Associations Between Nonclinical Cardiovascular Functional Endpoints and Repeat-dose Cardiovascular Toxicity in the Beagle Dog: A Cross-company Initiative. Toxicological Sciences. 176(1). 224–235. 4 indexed citations
3.
Kirk, Sarah, et al.. (2016). Investigation into the effect of microsampling on mouse fetuses and pregnant mice in the embryofetal development study design. Reproductive Toxicology. 67. 140–145. 3 indexed citations
4.
5.
Powles‐Glover, Nicola, Sarah Kirk, Chris Wilkinson, Sally Robinson, & Jane Stewart. (2014). Assessment of toxicological effects of blood microsampling in the vehicle dosed adult rat. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 68(3). 325–331. 26 indexed citations
6.
Powles‐Glover, Nicola, et al.. (2014). Assessment of haematological and clinical pathology effects of blood microsampling in suckling and weaned juvenile rats. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 69(3). 425–433. 14 indexed citations
7.
Stewart, Jane, et al.. (2013). Inhibin B in Plasma Samples from Male Volunteer Panel Selected for Health but Not Fertility: Sources of Variability. Birth Defects Research Part B Developmental and Reproductive Toxicology. 98(1). 104–109. 2 indexed citations
8.
Ewart, Lorna, et al.. (2012). The role of the anaesthetised guinea-pig in the preclinical cardiac safety evaluation of drug candidate compounds. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology. 263(2). 171–183. 23 indexed citations
9.
Harleman, Johannes H., Adam Hargreaves, Håkan Andersson, & Sarah Kirk. (2012). A Review of the Incidence and Coincidence of Uterine and Mammary Tumors in Wistar and Sprague-Dawley Rats Based on the RITA Database and the Role of Prolactin. Toxicologic Pathology. 40(6). 926–930. 23 indexed citations
10.
Ward‐Smith, Peggy, Sarah Kirk, Maxine Hetherington, & Christopher L. Hubble. (2005). Having a Child Diagnosed With Cancer: An Assessment of Values From the Mother's Viewpoint. Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing. 22(6). 320–327. 15 indexed citations
11.
Stanton, Annette L., Sharon Danoff‐Burg, Lisa A. Sworowski, et al.. (2002). Randomized, Controlled Trial of Written Emotional Expression and Benefit Finding in Breast Cancer Patients. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 20(20). 4160–4168. 407 indexed citations
12.
Stanton, Annette L., Sarah Kirk, Christine L. Cameron, & Sharon Danoff‐Burg. (2000). Coping through emotional approach: Scale construction and validation.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 78(6). 1150–1169. 423 indexed citations
13.
Stanton, Annette L., Sharon Danoff‐Burg, Christine L. Cameron, et al.. (2000). Emotionally expressive coping predicts psychological and physical adjustment to breast cancer.. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 68(5). 875–882. 44 indexed citations
14.
Stanton, Annette L., Sharon Danoff‐Burg, Christine L. Cameron, et al.. (2000). Emotionally expressive coping predicts psychological and physical adjustment to breast cancer.. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 68(5). 875–882. 570 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
Stanton, Annette L., Sarah Kirk, Christine L. Cameron, & Sharon Danoff‐Burg. (2000). Coping through emotional approach: Scale construction and validation.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 78(6). 1150–1169. 394 indexed citations
16.
Stanton, Annette L., et al.. (1999). Social comparison and adjustment to breast cancer: An experimental examination of upward affiliation and downward evaluation.. Health Psychology. 18(2). 151–158. 79 indexed citations
17.
Stanton, Annette L., et al.. (1999). Social comparison and adjustment to breast cancer: An experimental examination of upward affiliation and downward evaluation.. Health Psychology. 18(2). 151–158. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026