Sarah Hancock

1.7k total citations · 1 hit paper
28 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Sarah Hancock is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah Hancock has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 4 papers in Molecular Biology and 3 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in Sarah Hancock's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (8 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers) and Glaucoma and retinal disorders (2 papers). Sarah Hancock is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (8 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers) and Glaucoma and retinal disorders (2 papers). Sarah Hancock collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Sarah Hancock's co-authors include Virginia E. Papaioannou, Lee M. Silver, Deborah L. Chapman, Roni J. Bollag, Sergei I. Agulnik, Nancy Garvey, Jeremy J. Gibson‐Brown, Judith A. Cebra‐Thomas, Maria Alexiou and Timothy J. Andrews and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLANT PHYSIOLOGY and Genetics.

In The Last Decade

Sarah Hancock

26 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Hit Papers

Expression of the T-box family genes,Tbx1-Tbx5, during ea... 1996 2026 2006 2016 1996 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sarah Hancock United States 15 883 275 198 132 122 28 1.3k
James N. Ver Hoeve United States 19 400 0.5× 226 0.8× 133 0.7× 58 0.4× 112 0.9× 57 1.1k
F. Nienke Boonstra Netherlands 18 433 0.5× 162 0.6× 279 1.4× 16 0.1× 242 2.0× 47 1.0k
Kate Day United Kingdom 8 507 0.6× 176 0.6× 252 1.3× 39 0.3× 29 0.2× 9 1.6k
Sandeep Grover United States 30 1.4k 1.6× 149 0.5× 131 0.7× 38 0.3× 320 2.6× 107 3.1k
Klaus Hartung Germany 19 474 0.5× 88 0.3× 649 3.3× 41 0.3× 36 0.3× 48 1.6k
Annegret Dahlmann‐Noor United Kingdom 23 282 0.3× 47 0.2× 259 1.3× 75 0.6× 471 3.9× 112 1.7k
Barbara Zangerl Australia 23 716 0.8× 455 1.7× 56 0.3× 10 0.1× 79 0.6× 90 1.7k
Ingele Casteels Belgium 23 542 0.6× 315 1.1× 147 0.7× 172 1.3× 311 2.5× 123 1.8k
Eun‐Jae Lee South Korea 24 308 0.3× 188 0.7× 201 1.0× 71 0.5× 445 3.6× 127 2.0k
Christian Merkel Germany 16 473 0.5× 325 1.2× 203 1.0× 23 0.2× 20 0.2× 37 968

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Hancock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Hancock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Hancock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Hancock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Hancock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Hancock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Hancock. The network helps show where Sarah Hancock may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Hancock

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Hancock. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Hancock based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Hancock. Sarah Hancock is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Read, John, et al.. (2025). The adverse effects of electroconvulsive therapy beyond memory loss: an international survey of recipients and relatives. International Journal of Mental Health. 55(1). 112–132.
2.
3.
Hancock, Sarah, et al.. (2024). Thoracic ultrasound may improve paramedic diagnostic and management accuracy in undifferentiated respiratory distress. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5(2). e13164–e13164. 2 indexed citations
4.
Chen, Zichong, Daniel J. Jacob, Ritesh Gautam, et al.. (2023). Satellite quantification of methane emissions and oil–gas methane intensities from individual countries in the Middle East and North Africa: implications for climate action. Atmospheric chemistry and physics. 23(10). 5945–5967. 17 indexed citations
5.
Liu, Ming‐Che, Thomas A. DeFalco, Martin Stegmann, et al.. (2022). Evolutionary analysis of the LORELEI gene family in plants reveals regulatory subfunctionalization. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY. 190(4). 2539–2556. 16 indexed citations
6.
Hancock, Sarah, et al.. (2022). Adenoidectomy may decrease the need for a third set of tympanostomy tubes in children. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. 157. 111130–111130. 2 indexed citations
7.
Song, Colin, et al.. (2022). Repurposing BCL-2 and Jak 1/2 inhibitors: Cure and treatment of HIV-1 and other viral infections. Frontiers in Immunology. 13. 1033672–1033672. 14 indexed citations
8.
Hancock, Sarah. (2015). Have Your Cake and Eat It, Too. New Prairie Press (Kansas State University). 5(2). 14. 1 indexed citations
9.
McGovern, David P., Sarah Hancock, & Jonathan W. Peirce. (2011). The timing of binding and segregation of two compound aftereffects. Vision Research. 51(9). 1047–1057. 4 indexed citations
10.
Hancock, Sarah, David P. McGovern, & Jonathan W. Peirce. (2010). Ameliorating the combinatorial explosion with spatial frequency-matched combinations of V1 outputs. Journal of Vision. 10(8). 7–7. 8 indexed citations
11.
Bell, Jason, Sarah Hancock, F. A. A. Kingdom, & Jonathan W. Peirce. (2010). Global shape processing: Which parts form the whole?. Journal of Vision. 10(6). 16–16. 30 indexed citations
12.
Hancock, Sarah & Jonathan W. Peirce. (2008). Selective mechanisms for simple contours revealed by compound adaptation. Journal of Vision. 8(7). 11–11. 34 indexed citations
13.
Hancock, Sarah, David Whitney, & Timothy J. Andrews. (2008). The initial interactions underlying binocular rivalry require visual awareness. Journal of Vision. 8(1). 3–3. 14 indexed citations
14.
Hancock, Sarah, et al.. (2006). Pseudoephedrine Enhances Performance in 1500-m Runners. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 38(2). 329–333. 45 indexed citations
15.
Holmes, David, Sarah Hancock, & Timothy J. Andrews. (2005). Independent binocular integration for form and colour. Vision Research. 46(5). 665–677. 22 indexed citations
16.
Hancock, Sarah. (2003). FLUDARABINE AS FIRST LINE THERAPY FOR CHRONIC LYMPHOCYTIC LEUKAEMIA. 8 indexed citations
17.
Chapman, Deborah L., et al.. (1996). Tbx6,a Mouse T-Box Gene Implicated in Paraxial Mesoderm Formation at Gastrulation. Developmental Biology. 180(2). 534–542. 224 indexed citations
18.
Agulnik, Sergei I., Nancy Garvey, Sarah Hancock, et al.. (1996). Evolution of Mouse T-box Genes by Tandem Duplication and Cluster Dispersion. Genetics. 144(1). 249–254. 165 indexed citations
19.
Chapman, Deborah L., Nancy Garvey, Sarah Hancock, et al.. (1996). Expression of the T-box family genes,Tbx1-Tbx5, during early mouse development. Developmental Dynamics. 206(4). 379–390. 527 indexed citations breakdown →
20.
Verma, Udit, et al.. (1996). Hematopoietic potential of IL-2-cultured peripheral blood stem cells from breast cancer patients.. PubMed. 18(3). 521–5. 20 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026