Sarah Frisken
- Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design top 0.5%
- Computational Mechanics top 2%
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 2%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Co-authors
- Ronald N. PerryAlyn RockwoodThouis R. JonesAlexandra J. GolbyWilliam M. WellsSteve PieperTina KapurWenya Linda Bi
- Topics
- Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (18 papers)Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (13 papers)Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (12 papers)
- Cited by
- Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided DesignComputational MechanicsComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyCanada
In The Last Decade
Sarah Frisken
49 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
- Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 548
- Computational Mechanics 516
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 487
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 232
- Biomedical Engineering 173
Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Frisken
This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Frisken's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Frisken with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Frisken more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Frisken
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Frisken. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Frisken. The network helps show where Sarah Frisken may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Frisken
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Frisken. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Frisken based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Frisken. Sarah Frisken is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 18 | |
| 15 | 18 | |
| 16 | 34 | |
| 17 | 38 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 147 |
About Sarah Frisken
Sarah Frisken is a scholar working on Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 55 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (18 papers), Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (13 papers) and Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (548 citations), Computational Mechanics (516 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (487 citations). Sarah Frisken has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Ronald N. Perry, Alyn Rockwood, Thouis R. Jones, Alexandra J. Golby, William M. Wells, Steve Pieper, Tina Kapur, Wenya Linda Bi, Parikshit Juvekar and Rahul A. Sastry. Their work appears in journals such as NeuroImage, Journal of neurosurgery and IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.