Sarah E. Tevis

1.4k total citations
25 papers, 986 citations indexed

About

Sarah E. Tevis is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah E. Tevis has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 986 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 16 papers in Surgery and 7 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Sarah E. Tevis's work include Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (17 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (6 papers) and Hip and Femur Fractures (4 papers). Sarah E. Tevis is often cited by papers focused on Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (17 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (6 papers) and Hip and Femur Fractures (4 papers). Sarah E. Tevis collaborates with scholars based in United States. Sarah E. Tevis's co-authors include Gregory D. Kennedy, Eugene F. Foley, Bruce A. Harms, Charles P. Heise, Sharon M. Weber, K. Craig Kent, Evie H. Carchman, Mark Craven, Jon C. Gould and Adam Sheka and has published in prestigious journals such as Annals of Surgery, Nature Reviews Endocrinology and The American Journal of Surgery.

In The Last Decade

Sarah E. Tevis

25 papers receiving 969 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Sarah E. Tevis United States	18	624	417	319	152	113	25	986
Steve Kwon United States	19	713 1.1×	326 0.8×	244 0.8×	108 0.7×	61 0.5×	42	1.4k
Tyler S. Wahl United States	15	533 0.9×	349 0.8×	118 0.4×	81 0.5×	112 1.0×	27	1.0k
Julia R. Berian United States	17	519 0.8×	428 1.0×	205 0.6×	74 0.5×	57 0.5×	40	923
Rachel Owen United States	6	405 0.6×	255 0.6×	113 0.4×	184 1.2×	58 0.5×	8	677
Rinat Ariely United States	12	757 1.2×	297 0.7×	123 0.4×	80 0.5×	48 0.4×	26	1.3k
Emily Pearsall Canada	13	986 1.6×	595 1.4×	357 1.1×	116 0.8×	56 0.5×	25	1.1k
Zhaohui Fan United States	12	388 0.6×	110 0.3×	154 0.5×	223 1.5×	92 0.8×	34	719
Andrew J. Mullard United States	16	406 0.7×	229 0.5×	241 0.8×	161 1.1×	62 0.5×	25	821
Lucas E. Nikkel United States	17	458 0.7×	175 0.4×	208 0.7×	143 0.9×	28 0.2×	27	1.0k
Lingsong Yun Canada	18	236 0.4×	498 1.2×	294 0.9×	204 1.3×	58 0.5×	43	1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah E. Tevis

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah E. Tevis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah E. Tevis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah E. Tevis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah E. Tevis

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah E. Tevis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah E. Tevis. The network helps show where Sarah E. Tevis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah E. Tevis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah E. Tevis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah E. Tevis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah E. Tevis. Sarah E. Tevis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Tevis, Sarah E., et al.. (2018). Clinically Competent and Fiscally at Risk: Impact of Debt and Financial Parameters on the Surgical Resident. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 227(2). 163–171e7. 23 indexed citations

Feld, Shara I., et al.. (2016). Multiple postoperative complications: Making sense of the trajectories. Surgery. 160(6). 1666–1674. 9 indexed citations

Tevis, Sarah E., Gregory D. Kennedy, & K. Craig Kent. (2015). Is There a Relationship Between Patient Satisfaction and Favorable Surgical Outcomes?. Advances in Surgery. 49(1). 221–233. 57 indexed citations

Tevis, Sarah E., et al.. (2015). Implications of Multiple Complications on the Postoperative Recovery of General Surgery Patients. Annals of Surgery. 263(6). 1213–1218. 62 indexed citations

Sheka, Adam, Sarah E. Tevis, & Gregory D. Kennedy. (2015). Urinary tract infection after surgery for colorectal malignancy: risk factors and complications. The American Journal of Surgery. 211(1). 31–39. 30 indexed citations

Tevis, Sarah E., Evie H. Carchman, Eugene F. Foley, et al.. (2015). Postoperative Ileus—More than Just Prolonged Length of Stay?. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 19(9). 1684–1690. 90 indexed citations

Tevis, Sarah E. & Gregory D. Kennedy. (2015). Patient satisfaction: does surgical volume matter?. Journal of Surgical Research. 196(1). 124–129. 19 indexed citations

Tevis, Sarah E., et al.. (2015). Independent risk factors for prolonged postoperative ileus development. Journal of Surgical Research. 201(2). 279–285. 51 indexed citations

Tevis, Sarah E., Pasithorn A. Suwanabol, Evie H. Carchman, et al.. (2015). Characterizing Readmission in Ulcerative Colitis Patients Undergoing Restorative Proctocolectomy. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 19(3). 564–569. 10 indexed citations

10.

Minami, Christina A., Karl Y. Bilimoria, Julie K. Johnson, et al.. (2015). Process improvement in surgery. Current Problems in Surgery. 53(2). 62–96. 19 indexed citations

11.

Tevis, Sarah E. & Herbert Chen. (2015). Papillary thyroid cancer—how aggressive should surgery be?. Nature Reviews Endocrinology. 11(4). 195–196. 1 indexed citations

12.

Tevis, Sarah E., et al.. (2014). Multiple complications and short length of stay are associated with postoperative readmissions. The American Journal of Surgery. 207(4). 449–456. 54 indexed citations

13.

Tevis, Sarah E., Ryan K. Schmocker, & Gregory D. Kennedy. (2014). Can patients reliably identify safe, high quality care?. Journal of Hospital Administration. 3(5). 150–150. 18 indexed citations

14.

Tevis, Sarah E., et al.. (2014). Preoperative impairment is associated with a higher postdischarge level of care. Journal of Surgical Research. 193(1). 1–6. 6 indexed citations

15.

Tevis, Sarah E., et al.. (2014). Postdischarge complications are an important predictor of postoperative readmissions. The American Journal of Surgery. 208(4). 505–510. 37 indexed citations

16.

Tevis, Sarah E., et al.. (2014). A composite index for predicting readmission following emergency general surgery. The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care. 76(6). 1467–1472. 25 indexed citations

17.

Tevis, Sarah E., et al.. (2014). Implications of multiple complications on post-operative recovery in general surgery patients. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 219(4). e36–e36. 11 indexed citations

18.

Tevis, Sarah E., et al.. (2013). Postoperative Complications in Patients With Rectal Cancer Are Associated With Delays in Chemotherapy That Lead to Worse Disease-free and Overall Survival. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 56(12). 1339–1348. 108 indexed citations

19.

Tevis, Sarah E. & Gregory D. Kennedy. (2013). Postoperative complications and implications on patient-centered outcomes. Journal of Surgical Research. 181(1). 106–113. 137 indexed citations

20.

Tevis, Sarah E., Michael Garren, & Jon C. Gould. (2011). Revisional Surgery for Failed Vertical-Banded Gastroplasty. Obesity Surgery. 21(8). 1220–1224. 31 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact