Sarah Anderson

691 total citations
42 papers, 394 citations indexed

About

Sarah Anderson is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah Anderson has authored 42 papers receiving a total of 394 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Rehabilitation, 9 papers in General Health Professions and 8 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Sarah Anderson's work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (6 papers), Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics (6 papers) and Global Health Workforce Issues (6 papers). Sarah Anderson is often cited by papers focused on Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (6 papers), Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics (6 papers) and Global Health Workforce Issues (6 papers). Sarah Anderson collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Sarah Anderson's co-authors include Jodi Oakman, Michael P. Dillon, Rwth Stuckey, Anuradha Mittal, Jerry Mander, Kate D’Cruz, Jørn Wetterslev, Susan Ash, Martha Doyle and J. B. Dahl and has published in prestigious journals such as Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Disability and Rehabilitation and International Journal of Infectious Diseases.

In The Last Decade

Sarah Anderson

35 papers receiving 360 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sarah Anderson Australia 11 92 83 60 54 54 42 394
Cristiane Helena Gallasch Brazil 12 44 0.5× 162 2.0× 12 0.2× 26 0.5× 37 0.7× 70 448
Melek Esin Türkiye 12 144 1.6× 173 2.1× 79 1.3× 28 0.5× 62 1.1× 45 495
Kate Harris United States 5 19 0.2× 138 1.7× 11 0.2× 26 0.5× 164 3.0× 7 502
Jon Boyer United States 12 196 2.1× 238 2.9× 40 0.7× 29 0.5× 35 0.6× 17 464
Naomi Anderson United States 11 39 0.4× 92 1.1× 9 0.1× 45 0.8× 75 1.4× 26 350
Michael Grey United States 9 41 0.4× 138 1.7× 19 0.3× 31 0.6× 160 3.0× 26 395
Miguel Moscoso‐Porras Peru 11 8 0.1× 50 0.6× 2 0.0× 21 0.4× 36 0.7× 24 247
Mirelle de Oliveira Saes Brazil 10 20 0.2× 271 3.3× 4 0.1× 62 1.1× 80 1.5× 56 465
Pedro Norton Portugal 10 16 0.2× 83 1.0× 7 0.1× 63 1.2× 43 0.8× 35 317
Nancy Blake United States 9 13 0.1× 200 2.4× 26 0.4× 57 1.1× 46 0.9× 49 448

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Anderson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Anderson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Anderson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Anderson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Anderson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Anderson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Anderson. The network helps show where Sarah Anderson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Anderson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Anderson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Anderson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Anderson. Sarah Anderson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Toovey, Rachel, et al.. (2024). Participation experiences of young people with limb difference in sports and recreation in Australia: a qualitative study. Disability and Rehabilitation. 47(12). 3088–3099.
3.
D’Cruz, Kate, et al.. (2023). Exploring the barriers and facilitators to community reintegration for adults following traumatic upper limb amputation: a mixed methods systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation. 46(8). 1471–1484. 5 indexed citations
4.
Anderson, Sarah, et al.. (2023). Demographic changes in Australia’s regulated health professions: 6-year trends. Australian Health Review. 47(2). 246–253. 8 indexed citations
5.
Anderson, Sarah, et al.. (2023). Evidence for continuing professional development standards for regulated health practitioners in Australia: a systematic review. Human Resources for Health. 21(1). 23–23. 22 indexed citations
6.
Anderson, Sarah, et al.. (2023). Evidence for recency of practice standards for regulated health practitioners in Australia: a systematic review. Human Resources for Health. 21(1). 14–14. 2 indexed citations
7.
Gaag, Anna van der, Patrick Maher, Manaan Kar Ray, et al.. (2023). ‘Virtually daily grief’—understanding distress in health practitioners involved in a regulatory complaints process: a qualitative study in Australia. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 35(4). 1 indexed citations
8.
D’Cruz, Kate, et al.. (2023). Barriers and facilitators to community reintegration in adults following traumatic upper limb amputation: an exploratory study. Disability and Rehabilitation. 46(16). 3691–3701. 2 indexed citations
9.
D’Cruz, Kate, et al.. (2022). Social and community participation following traumatic lower limb amputation: an exploratory qualitative study. Disability and Rehabilitation. 45(26). 4404–4412. 16 indexed citations
10.
Anderson, Sarah, Cleveland T. Barnett, & David Rusaw. (2021). Exploring the perspectives of prosthetic and orthotic users: past and present experiences and insights for the future. Disability and Rehabilitation. 44(18). 5284–5290. 4 indexed citations
11.
Gee, Christine E., et al.. (2021). Responding to Sexual Boundary Notifications: The Evolving Regulatory Approach in Australia. Journal of Medical Regulation. 107(2). 25–31. 3 indexed citations
12.
Anderson, Sarah, Victoria Weale, Rwth Stuckey, & Jodi Oakman. (2021). Work-related musculoskeletal pain in prosthetists and orthotists. PubMed. 45(6). 538–543.
14.
Anderson, Sarah, et al.. (2019). ‘It’s . . . forward-focused’. Prosthetics and Orthotics International. 43(6). 601–608. 5 indexed citations
15.
Anderson, Sarah, Rwth Stuckey, & Jodi Oakman. (2018). Work-related musculoskeletal injuries in prosthetists and orthotists in Australia. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics. 27(3). 708–713. 5 indexed citations
16.
Dillon, Michael P., et al.. (2016). Demographics of the Australian orthotic and prosthetic workforce 2007–12. Australian Health Review. 40(5). 555–561. 8 indexed citations
17.
Wall, Kristin M., William Kilembe, Mubiana Inambao, et al.. (2015). Implementation of an electronic fingerprint-linked data collection system: a feasibility and acceptability study among Zambian female sex workers. Globalization and Health. 11(1). 27–27. 29 indexed citations
18.
Anderson, Sarah, Rwth Stuckey, & Jodi Oakman. (2015). Prosthetists’ and Orthotists’ experience of their work and workspace – characterising the physical and organisational environment. Prosthetics and Orthotics International. 40(6). 703–712. 8 indexed citations
19.
Anderson, Sarah, et al.. (2002). Appropriateness of leaving emergency medical service treated hypoglycemic patients at home: a retrospective study. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 46(4). 464–468. 25 indexed citations
20.
Anderson, Sarah, Jerry Mander, & Anuradha Mittal. (2000). Views from the South : the effects of globalization and the WTO on Third World countries. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 23 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026