Sandra Scarr‐Salapatek
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 10%
- Education top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Margaret L. WilliamsWilliam B. BarkerSolomon H. KatzLouise Carter‐SaltzmanMatthew L. WilliamsRobert C. ElstonRoger M. SiervogelA.J. Pakstis
- Topics
- Cognitive Abilities and Testing (5 papers)Infant Development and Preterm Care (3 papers)Infant Health and Development (3 papers)
- Journals
- NatureSciencePEDIATRICS
- Partner nations
- United StatesQatar
In The Last Decade
Sandra Scarr‐Salapatek
15 papers receiving 463 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 214
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 159
- Education 103
- Clinical Psychology 97
- Sociology and Political Science 85
Countries citing papers authored by Sandra Scarr‐Salapatek
This map shows the geographic impact of Sandra Scarr‐Salapatek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sandra Scarr‐Salapatek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sandra Scarr‐Salapatek more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sandra Scarr‐Salapatek
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sandra Scarr‐Salapatek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sandra Scarr‐Salapatek. The network helps show where Sandra Scarr‐Salapatek may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sandra Scarr‐Salapatek
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sandra Scarr‐Salapatek. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sandra Scarr‐Salapatek based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sandra Scarr‐Salapatek. Sandra Scarr‐Salapatek is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 39 | |
| 3 | 23 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 145 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 20 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | Book Reviews: Environment, Heredity, and Intelligence; The IQ Argument; I. Q. | 2 |
| 14 | 261 | |
| 15 | 28 |
About Sandra Scarr‐Salapatek
Sandra Scarr‐Salapatek is a scholar working on Pharmacy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 15 papers that have together received 557 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cognitive Abilities and Testing (5 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (3 papers) and Infant Health and Development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (214 citations), Pharmacy (53 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (159 citations). Sandra Scarr‐Salapatek has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Qatar. Frequent co-authors include Margaret L. Williams, William B. Barker, Solomon H. Katz, Louise Carter‐Saltzman, Matthew L. Williams, Robert C. Elston, Roger M. Siervogel, A.J. Pakstis, Herbert F. Polesky and Michael K. McCormack. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and PEDIATRICS.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.