Sam Rudham

540 total citations
8 papers, 180 citations indexed

About

Sam Rudham is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Molecular Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Sam Rudham has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 180 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Pharmacology, 3 papers in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and 3 papers in Molecular Medicine. Recurrent topics in Sam Rudham's work include Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (6 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (3 papers) and Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (3 papers). Sam Rudham is often cited by papers focused on Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (6 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (3 papers) and Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (3 papers). Sam Rudham collaborates with scholars based in Australia, New Zealand and France. Sam Rudham's co-authors include Steven C. Wallis, John F. Fraser, Quoc Nguyen, Kiran Shekar, John E. Ray, Jason A. Roberts, Deborah Marriott, Hergen Buscher, Susan Welch and Fay Burrows and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Critical Care Medicine and Clinical Pharmacokinetics.

In The Last Decade

Sam Rudham

8 papers receiving 180 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sam Rudham Australia 7 103 71 57 39 32 8 180
Fay Burrows Australia 7 84 0.8× 45 0.6× 80 1.4× 35 0.9× 31 1.0× 14 203
Hyo Jung Park South Korea 11 79 0.8× 28 0.4× 48 0.8× 60 1.5× 14 0.4× 33 281
Simone Lindau Germany 10 27 0.3× 28 0.4× 48 0.8× 20 0.5× 13 0.4× 21 250
Jörn Grensemann Germany 11 52 0.5× 35 0.5× 57 1.0× 19 0.5× 85 2.7× 47 304
Charles Vidal France 7 38 0.4× 80 1.1× 57 1.0× 11 0.3× 7 0.2× 23 183
Roland Smonig France 7 29 0.3× 21 0.3× 113 2.0× 60 1.5× 12 0.4× 11 233
Vin Pellegrino Australia 4 46 0.4× 122 1.7× 19 0.3× 15 0.4× 24 0.8× 6 205
Paweł Piwowarczyk Poland 10 45 0.4× 21 0.3× 37 0.6× 26 0.7× 45 1.4× 37 256
Sanjiv Nichani United Kingdom 9 24 0.2× 45 0.6× 61 1.1× 28 0.7× 14 0.4× 14 209
Bethany R Tellor Pennington United States 10 30 0.3× 55 0.8× 55 1.0× 8 0.2× 39 1.2× 23 256

Countries citing papers authored by Sam Rudham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sam Rudham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sam Rudham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sam Rudham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sam Rudham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sam Rudham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sam Rudham. The network helps show where Sam Rudham may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sam Rudham

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sam Rudham. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sam Rudham based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sam Rudham. Sam Rudham is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Abdul‐Aziz, Mohd H., Fay Burrows, Hergen Buscher, et al.. (2022). Population Pharmacokinetics and Dosing Simulations of Ceftriaxone in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (An ASAP ECMO Study). Clinical Pharmacokinetics. 61(6). 847–856. 13 indexed citations
2.
Abdul‐Aziz, Mohd H., Fay Burrows, Hergen Buscher, et al.. (2022). Population pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin in critically ill patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (an ASAP ECMO study). Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine. 41(3). 101080–101080. 6 indexed citations
3.
Abdul‐Aziz, Mohd H., Fay Burrows, Hergen Buscher, et al.. (2021). Population pharmacokinetics of cefepime in critically ill patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (an ASAP ECMO study). International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 58(6). 106466–106466. 19 indexed citations
4.
Sinnah, Fabrice, Kiran Shekar, Mohd H. Abdul‐Aziz, et al.. (2017). Incremental research approach to describing the pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.. PubMed. 19(Suppl 1). 8–14. 9 indexed citations
5.
Nguyen, Duy T., et al.. (2015). Spinal Cord Infarct During Concomitant Circulatory Support With Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump and Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. Critical Care Medicine. 44(2). e101–e105. 24 indexed citations
6.
Shekar, Kiran, Jason A. Roberts, Susan Welch, et al.. (2012). ASAP ECMO: Antibiotic, Sedative and Analgesic Pharmacokinetics during Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: a multi-centre study to optimise drug therapy during ECMO. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 73 indexed citations
7.
Shekar, Kiran, Jason A. Roberts, Susan Welch, et al.. (2012). ASAP ECMO: Antibiotic, Sedative and Analgesic Pharmacokinetics during Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: a multi-centre study to optimise drug therapy during ECMO. BMC Anesthesiology. 12(1). 29–29. 3 indexed citations
8.
Ray, John E., et al.. (2011). Posaconazole Plasma Concentrations in Critically Ill Patients. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring. 33(4). 387–392. 33 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026