Sam Geen

1.3k total citations
26 papers, 877 citations indexed

About

Sam Geen is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation and Atmospheric Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Sam Geen has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 877 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 4 papers in Instrumentation and 2 papers in Atmospheric Science. Recurrent topics in Sam Geen's work include Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (23 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (20 papers) and Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (9 papers). Sam Geen is often cited by papers focused on Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (23 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (20 papers) and Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (9 papers). Sam Geen collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and France. Sam Geen's co-authors include Joakim Rosdahl, P. Hennebelle, Pascal Tremblin, Rebekka Bieri, Adrianne Slyz, Julien Devriendt, J. Blaizot, Ralf S. Klessen, Massimo Ricotti and J. D. Soler and has published in prestigious journals such as Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series and Astronomy and Astrophysics.

In The Last Decade

Sam Geen

24 papers receiving 792 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sam Geen Germany 19 839 122 87 69 52 26 877
Dávid Guszejnov United States 18 749 0.9× 103 0.8× 54 0.6× 44 0.6× 84 1.6× 30 811
Anna L. Rosen United States 14 605 0.7× 81 0.7× 55 0.6× 47 0.7× 34 0.7× 28 643
Jessy Jose India 17 869 1.0× 211 1.7× 42 0.5× 112 1.6× 56 1.1× 62 887
Andrea Gatto Germany 11 1.0k 1.2× 109 0.9× 93 1.1× 60 0.9× 183 3.5× 13 1.0k
C. Román-Zúñiga Mexico 18 1.0k 1.2× 170 1.4× 110 1.3× 213 3.1× 23 0.4× 64 1.1k
M. G. Petr-Gotzens Germany 19 890 1.1× 219 1.8× 54 0.6× 123 1.8× 23 0.4× 63 918
Tracy L. Beck United States 20 1.3k 1.6× 147 1.2× 65 0.7× 235 3.4× 80 1.5× 63 1.3k
N. Vaytet United Kingdom 15 641 0.8× 40 0.3× 79 0.9× 102 1.5× 62 1.2× 23 678
V. Roccatagliata Germany 17 779 0.9× 135 1.1× 34 0.4× 137 2.0× 25 0.5× 48 798
Marina Kounkel United States 17 1.3k 1.5× 344 2.8× 89 1.0× 232 3.4× 39 0.8× 56 1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Sam Geen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sam Geen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sam Geen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sam Geen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sam Geen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sam Geen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sam Geen. The network helps show where Sam Geen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sam Geen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sam Geen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sam Geen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sam Geen. Sam Geen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Geen, Sam, et al.. (2023). The energy and dynamics of trapped radiative feedback with stellar winds. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 526(2). 1832–1849. 6 indexed citations
2.
Bieri, Rebekka, Thorsten Naab, Sam Geen, et al.. (2023). The SATIN project – I. Turbulent multiphase ISM in Milky Way simulations with SNe feedback from stellar clusters. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 523(4). 6336–6359. 15 indexed citations
3.
Hennebelle, P., et al.. (2022). . arXiv (Cornell University). 18 indexed citations
4.
Brands, S. A., A. de Koter, J. M. Bestenlehner, et al.. (2022). The R136 star cluster dissected with Hubble Space Telescope/STIS. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 663. A36–A36. 77 indexed citations
5.
Glover, Simon C. O., et al.. (2022). Trapping of H ii regions in Population III star formation. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 512(1). 116–136. 36 indexed citations
6.
Keszthelyi, Z., A. de Koter, Y. Götberg, et al.. (2022). The effects of surface fossil magnetic fields on massive star evolution: IV. Grids of models at Solar, LMC, and SMC metallicities. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 517(2). 2028–2055. 19 indexed citations
7.
Whitworth, A. P., F D Priestley, & Sam Geen. (2022). Ionizing feedback from an O star formed in a shock-compressed layer. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 517(4). 4940–4949. 3 indexed citations
8.
Kimm, Taysun, Rebekka Bieri, Sam Geen, et al.. (2022). A Systematic Study of the Escape of LyC and Lyα Photons from Star-forming, Magnetized Turbulent Clouds. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 259(1). 21–21. 36 indexed citations
9.
Schootemeijer, A., N. Langer, D. J. Lennon, et al.. (2021). . UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 11 indexed citations
10.
Keszthelyi, Z., G. Meynet, S. A. Brands, et al.. (2021). Spin-down and reduced mass loss in early-type stars with large-scale magnetic fields. Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union. 17(S370). 257–262.
11.
Treviño-Morales, S. P., A. Fuente, Á. Sánchez-Monge, et al.. (2019). Dynamics of cluster-forming hub-filament systems. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 629. A81–A81. 75 indexed citations
12.
Treviño-Morales, S. P., A. Fuente, Á. Sánchez-Monge, et al.. (2019). Dynamics of cluster-forming hub-filament systems: The case of the high-mass star-forming complex Monoceros R2. arXiv (Cornell University). 22 indexed citations
13.
Geen, Sam, E. Pellegrini, Rebekka Bieri, & Ralf S. Klessen. (2019). When H ii regions are complicated: considering perturbations from winds, radiation pressure, and other effects. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 492(1). 915–933. 32 indexed citations
14.
Ricotti, Massimo, et al.. (2019). Simulating star clusters across cosmic time – I. Initial mass function, star formation rates, and efficiencies. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 489(2). 1880–1898. 41 indexed citations
15.
Hennebelle, P., et al.. (2018). Impact of galactic shear and stellar feedback on star formation. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 620. A21–A21. 28 indexed citations
16.
Geen, Sam, Stuart K. Watson, Joakim Rosdahl, et al.. (2018). On the indeterministic nature of star formation on the cloud scale. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 481(2). 2548–2569. 42 indexed citations
17.
Geen, Sam, J. D. Soler, & P. Hennebelle. (2017). Interpreting the star formation efficiency of nearby molecular clouds with ionizing radiation. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 471(4). 4844–4855. 51 indexed citations
18.
Geen, Sam, P. Hennebelle, Pascal Tremblin, & Joakim Rosdahl. (2016). Feedback in Clouds II: UV photoionization and the first supernova in a massive cloud. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 463(3). 3129–3142. 61 indexed citations
19.
Geen, Sam, P. Hennebelle, Pascal Tremblin, & Joakim Rosdahl. (2015). Photoionization feedback in a self-gravitating, magnetized, turbulent cloud. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 454(4). 4484–4502. 53 indexed citations
20.
Geen, Sam, Adrianne Slyz, & Julien Devriendt. (2011). How Does Feedback Affect Milky Way Satellite Formation?. EAS Publications Series. 48. 441–446.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026