Saleem Shaik

1.1k total citations
68 papers, 668 citations indexed

About

Saleem Shaik is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Management Science and Operations Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Saleem Shaik has authored 68 papers receiving a total of 668 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 37 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 18 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and 15 papers in Management Science and Operations Research. Recurrent topics in Saleem Shaik's work include Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets (18 papers), Efficiency Analysis Using DEA (15 papers) and Agricultural Economics and Policy (14 papers). Saleem Shaik is often cited by papers focused on Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets (18 papers), Efficiency Analysis Using DEA (15 papers) and Agricultural Economics and Policy (14 papers). Saleem Shaik collaborates with scholars based in United States, India and Brazil. Saleem Shaik's co-authors include Joseph A. Atwood, Dragan Miljković, Myles J. Watts, Ashok K. Mishra, Glenn A. Helmers, Hisham S. El‐Osta, Keith H. Coble, Subir Bairagi, Aditya R. Khanal and Terrill R. Hanson and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Applied Energy and European Journal of Operational Research.

In The Last Decade

Saleem Shaik

61 papers receiving 603 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Saleem Shaik United States 15 305 200 187 110 59 68 668
Nicholas E. Rada United States 12 195 0.6× 368 1.8× 238 1.3× 81 0.7× 25 0.4× 37 708
Robert Townsend South Africa 16 170 0.6× 223 1.1× 125 0.7× 111 1.0× 43 0.7× 47 613
Binlei Gong China 14 512 1.7× 148 0.7× 169 0.9× 115 1.0× 82 1.4× 39 957
Connie Chan‐Kang United States 12 338 1.1× 257 1.3× 135 0.7× 40 0.4× 56 0.9× 21 812
Kwabena Asomanin Anaman Ghana 16 346 1.1× 123 0.6× 84 0.4× 84 0.8× 69 1.2× 70 900
Alain Carpentier France 12 319 1.0× 314 1.6× 101 0.5× 119 1.1× 30 0.5× 18 647
Madhur Gautam United States 16 216 0.7× 377 1.9× 224 1.2× 52 0.5× 28 0.5× 33 760
Pasquale Lucio Scandizzo Italy 14 390 1.3× 253 1.3× 236 1.3× 39 0.4× 134 2.3× 81 783
Henry Jordaan South Africa 17 206 0.7× 240 1.2× 144 0.8× 34 0.3× 33 0.6× 54 780
Alan Matthews Ireland 17 311 1.0× 425 2.1× 110 0.6× 130 1.2× 142 2.4× 110 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Saleem Shaik

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Saleem Shaik's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Saleem Shaik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Saleem Shaik more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Saleem Shaik

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Saleem Shaik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Saleem Shaik. The network helps show where Saleem Shaik may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Saleem Shaik

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Saleem Shaik. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Saleem Shaik based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Saleem Shaik. Saleem Shaik is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Shaik, Saleem. (2024). Contribution of climate change to sector-source energy demand. Energy. 294. 130777–130777. 5 indexed citations
2.
Shaik, Saleem, et al.. (2024). Recovery of Co-rich metal alloy from end-of-life Li-ion batteries. Materials Today Proceedings. 112. 99–105.
3.
Beckman, Jayson, Maros Ivanic, & Saleem Shaik. (2023). How bilateral trade deals get in the way of multilateral agreements: Why WTO is marginalized. Journal of Policy Modeling. 45(5). 877–894. 1 indexed citations
4.
Shaik, Saleem, et al.. (2020). Corn Production Indicators Report: Trend and Risk Analysis. AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA). 1 indexed citations
5.
Miljković, Dragan, et al.. (2015). The impact of trade openness on technical efficiency in the agricultural sector of the European Union. Applied Economics. 47(12). 1230–1247. 26 indexed citations
6.
Oduor, Peter G., et al.. (2012). Leveraging a spatio-temporal drought severity and coverage index with crop yield modelled as a stochastic process. International Journal of Hydrology Science and Technology. 2(3). 219–219. 6 indexed citations
7.
Shaik, Saleem, et al.. (2012). Market Structure Conduct Performance Hypothesis Revisited Using Stochastic Frontier Efficiency Analysis. Journal of the Transportation Research Forum. 48(3). 21 indexed citations
8.
Shaik, Saleem, et al.. (2012). Evaluating the Causes of Rising Food Prices in Low and Middle Income Countries. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics. 44(3). 411–422. 4 indexed citations
9.
Miljković, Dragan, et al.. (2012). Trade openness and technical efficiency in Brazilian agriculture. Applied Economics Letters. 20(2). 103–106. 15 indexed citations
10.
Miljković, Dragan, et al.. (2012). Impact of biofuel policies on livestock production in the United States. Journal of Policy Modeling. 34(6). 817–831. 11 indexed citations
11.
Miljković, Dragan, et al.. (2010). The Impact of Trade Openness on Technical Efficiency in U.S. Agriculture. AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA). 8 indexed citations
12.
Shaik, Saleem, et al.. (2010). Dynamic Relationships Between Farm Real Estate Values and Federal Farm Program Payments. Journal of agricultural and resource economics. 35(1). 153–165. 2 indexed citations
13.
Shaik, Saleem, et al.. (2009). Exchange Rates Impacts on Agricultural Inputs Prices using VAR. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics. 41(2). 511–520. 4 indexed citations
14.
Shaik, Saleem, Keith H. Coble, Thomas O. Knight, Alan E. Baquet, & George F. Patrick. (2008). Crop Revenue and Yield Insurance Demand: A Subjective Probability Approach. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics. 40(3). 757–766. 38 indexed citations
15.
Shaik, Saleem, et al.. (2006). AN EXAMINATION OF FARM PROGRAM PAYMENTS ON FARM ECONOMIC STRUCTURE. AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA). 3 indexed citations
16.
Atwood, Joseph A., et al.. (2006). AJAE Appendix: Estimability and Identifying the Estimability Status of a System of Restrictions. AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA). 88(2). 1–13. 1 indexed citations
17.
Atwood, Joseph A., et al.. (2006). Estimating the Prevalence and Cost of Yield‐Switching Fraud in the Federal Crop Insurance Program. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 88(2). 365–381. 11 indexed citations
18.
Allen, Albert J., et al.. (2004). Stochastic Frontier Efficiency Analysis of Agribusiness Trucking Companies. AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA). 2 indexed citations
19.
Atwood, Joseph A., Saleem Shaik, & Myles J. Watts. (2003). Are Crop Yields Normally Distributed? A Reexamination. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 85(4). 888–901. 65 indexed citations
20.
Shaik, Saleem. (2000). Environmentally adjusted productivity [EAP] Measures for the Nebraska Agriculture Sector. Insecta mundi. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026