С. Окубо

4.6k total citations · 1 hit paper
129 papers, 3.6k citations indexed

About

С. Окубо is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, С. Окубо has authored 129 papers receiving a total of 3.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 94 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 27 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 16 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. Recurrent topics in С. Окубо's work include Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (81 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (76 papers) and Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (30 papers). С. Окубо is often cited by papers focused on Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (81 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (76 papers) and Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (30 papers). С. Окубо collaborates with scholars based in United States, Japan and Italy. С. Окубо's co-authors include V. S. Mathur, R. E. Marshak, T. K. Das, L. K. Pandit, J. Patera, J. Leitner, E. C. G. Sudarshan, A. Gamba, N. Mukunda and George Sudarshan and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Physical Review Letters and Nuclear Physics B.

In The Last Decade

С. Окубо

127 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

φ-meson and unitary symmetry model

1963 850 citations С. Окубо Physics Letters profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
С. Окубо United States	31	3.1k	468	207	150	149	129	3.6k
A. Pais United States	33	3.0k 1.0×	1.1k 2.3×	348 1.7×	320 2.1×	249 1.7×	108	4.1k
Reinhard Oehme United States	22	1.5k 0.5×	560 1.2×	203 1.0×	136 0.9×	131 0.9×	103	2.1k
M. Jacob Switzerland	23	2.7k 0.9×	679 1.5×	207 1.0×	188 1.3×	299 2.0×	84	3.4k
Loyal Durand United States	33	2.7k 0.9×	707 1.5×	232 1.1×	201 1.3×	203 1.4×	148	3.4k
C. Lovelace United Kingdom	18	1.6k 0.5×	801 1.7×	217 1.0×	123 0.8×	260 1.7×	28	2.2k
Haim Harari Israel	30	3.1k 1.0×	430 0.9×	229 1.1×	270 1.8×	203 1.4×	77	3.6k
Kameshwar C. Wali United States	23	1.7k 0.6×	310 0.7×	191 0.9×	298 2.0×	126 0.8×	107	2.1k
Charles B. Chiu United States	28	1.5k 0.5×	731 1.6×	379 1.8×	113 0.8×	163 1.1×	123	2.4k
J.‐C. Raynal France	34	4.4k 1.4×	782 1.7×	136 0.7×	111 0.7×	157 1.1×	160	4.7k
Noboru Nakanishi Japan	22	1.7k 0.5×	741 1.6×	583 2.8×	518 3.5×	53 0.4×	159	2.2k

Countries citing papers authored by С. Окубо

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of С. Окубо's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by С. Окубо with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites С. Окубо more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by С. Окубо

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by С. Окубо. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by С. Окубо. The network helps show where С. Окубо may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of С. Окубо

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of С. Окубо. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of С. Окубо based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with С. Окубо. С. Окубо is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Ohta, Hitoshi, С. Окубо, Eiji Ohmichi, Hideyuki Takahashi, & Tatsuya Sakurai. (2024). What is Multi-extreme THz ESR? Developments and its Applications. Applied Magnetic Resonance. 56(1-2). 33–55.

2.

Kawasaki, Hikaru, Daisuke Sawamura, T. Kikuchi, et al.. (2003). Squamous cell carcinoma developing in a 12-year-old boy with nonHallopeau-Siemens recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. British Journal of Dermatology. 148(5). 1047–1050. 27 indexed citations

3.

Окубо, С. & R. E. Marshak. (1992). Argument for the Non-Existence of the "Strong CP Problem" in QCD. Progress of Theoretical Physics. 87(4). 1059–1062. 2 indexed citations

4.

Окубо, С.. (1982). Classification of flexible composition algebras, II. 16 indexed citations

5.

Окубо, С. & Hyo Chul Myung. (1979). Classification of simple flexible Lie-admissible algebras. 5 indexed citations

6.

Окубо, С.. (1979). Octonion, pseudo-alternative, and Lie-admissible algebras. 3 indexed citations

7.

Окубо, С.. (1978). Deformation of the Lie-admissible pseudo-octonion algebra into the octonion algebra. 4 indexed citations

8.

Abe, Yoshikazu, Kazuya Fujii, Kazuyuki Iwata, et al.. (1978). Charmed-meson decays and some evidence for $$\left( {\bar cs} \right)_R $$ currentcurrent. Lettere al nuovo cimento della societa italiana di fisica/Lettere al nuovo cimento. 22(6). 209–214. 5 indexed citations

9.

Окубо, С.. (1973). An analysis of Chew-Low integral equation. Nuovo cimento della Società italiana di fisica. A, Nuclei, particles and fields. 16(2). 241–260. 5 indexed citations

10.

Окубо, С., et al.. (1972). Weakκ-Dominance Model and Bounds onKl3Decay Parameters. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 6(5). 1393–1403. 8 indexed citations

11.

Mohapatra, Rabindra N., et al.. (1968). Spectral sum rules for three-point functions and their application to π0→2γ decay. Nuovo cimento della Società italiana di fisica. A, Nuclei, particles and fields. 58(3). 589–594. 1 indexed citations

12.

Mathur, V. S., С. Окубо, & L. K. Pandit. (1966). Algebra of Currents andKe3Decay. Physical Review Letters. 16(9). 371–374. 116 indexed citations

13.

Marshak, R. E., N. Mukunda, & С. Окубо. (1965). Three-Field Model and Higher Symmetry GroupW3with Parity Interchange. Physical Review. 137(3B). B698–B708. 37 indexed citations

14.

Окубо, С., et al.. (1964). ON THE EQUIVALENCE OF THE MAJORANA AND TWO-COMPONENT THEORIES OF THE NEUTRINO. Il Nuovo Cimento. 1 indexed citations

15.

Marshak, R. E., N. Mukunda, & С. Окубо. (1964). Some consequences of higher symmetry group W3 with parity interchange. Physics Letters. 13(2). 180–182. 6 indexed citations

16.

Окубо, С.. (1963). Some consequences of unitary symmetry model. Physics Letters. 4(1). 14–16. 102 indexed citations

17.

Окубо, С.. (1961). Green’s function in some covariant soluble problems. Il Nuovo Cimento. 19(3). 574–585. 22 indexed citations

18.

Marinaro, M., et al.. (1960). Note on possible rare decay modes for elementary particles. Il Nuovo Cimento. 15(6). 934–936. 7 indexed citations

19.

Окубо, С., et al.. (1958). Interaction Current in Strangeness-Violating Decays. Physical Review. 112(2). 665–668. 36 indexed citations

20.

Окубо, С.. (1953). Non-perturbation Approach Method by Edwards. Progress of Theoretical Physics. 10(6). 692–694. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact