S. Noji

1.4k total citations
21 papers, 128 citations indexed

About

S. Noji is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Radiation and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, S. Noji has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 128 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 14 papers in Radiation and 7 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in S. Noji's work include Nuclear physics research studies (18 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (13 papers) and Astronomical and nuclear sciences (5 papers). S. Noji is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear physics research studies (18 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (13 papers) and Astronomical and nuclear sciences (5 papers). S. Noji collaborates with scholars based in United States, Japan and Germany. S. Noji's co-authors include D. Bazin, R. G. T. Zegers, A. Gade, D. Weißhaar, B. A. Brown, T. Baugher, E. Lunderberg, F. Recchia, K. W. Kemper and J. A. Tostevin and has published in prestigious journals such as Physics Letters B, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment and The European Physical Journal A.

In The Last Decade

S. Noji

17 papers receiving 127 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
S. Noji United States 8 117 58 51 15 13 21 128
M. Sawicka Poland 8 136 1.2× 58 1.0× 66 1.3× 15 1.0× 14 1.1× 12 152
C. J. Prokop United States 8 119 1.0× 74 1.3× 56 1.1× 22 1.5× 9 0.7× 25 147
S. Roccia France 6 75 0.6× 26 0.4× 42 0.8× 11 0.7× 17 1.3× 15 98
U. Friman-Gayer United States 7 101 0.9× 51 0.9× 40 0.8× 23 1.5× 24 1.8× 17 113
T. Beck Germany 6 94 0.8× 41 0.7× 48 0.9× 20 1.3× 19 1.5× 20 107
V. Soukeras Italy 7 121 1.0× 40 0.7× 38 0.7× 18 1.2× 9 0.7× 24 128
M. P. Reiter Germany 7 59 0.5× 33 0.6× 39 0.8× 24 1.6× 21 1.6× 12 90
J. Cederkäll Sweden 7 104 0.9× 42 0.7× 46 0.9× 11 0.7× 11 0.8× 23 125
O. Ivanov Belgium 7 171 1.5× 56 1.0× 77 1.5× 24 1.6× 7 0.5× 8 181
P. Gangnant France 4 136 1.2× 68 1.2× 52 1.0× 9 0.6× 19 1.5× 7 151

Countries citing papers authored by S. Noji

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S. Noji's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. Noji with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. Noji more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S. Noji

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. Noji. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. Noji. The network helps show where S. Noji may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of S. Noji

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S. Noji. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S. Noji based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with S. Noji. S. Noji is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Choi, Yoon Hyuck, Danlu Zhang, Cameron L. C. Smith, et al.. (2025). The High Transmission Beamline Superconducting Magnets for High Rigidity Spectrometer Project at FRIB: Design Status. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 35(5). 1–5.
2.
Spieker, M., D. Bazin, S. Biswas, et al.. (2024). Proton removal from Br73,75 to Se72,74 at intermediate energies. Physical review. C. 109(1).
3.
Spieker, M., S. E. Agbemava, D. Bazin, et al.. (2023). Hexadecapole strength in the rare isotopes 74,76Kr. Physics Letters B. 841. 137932–137932. 7 indexed citations
4.
Spieker, M., L. A. Riley, P. D. Cottle, et al.. (2022). Investigation of octupole collectivity near the A=72 shape-transitional point. Physical review. C. 106(5). 5 indexed citations
5.
Noji, S., R. G. T. Zegers, G.P.A. Berg, et al.. (2022). Design of the High Rigidity Spectrometer at FRIB. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 1045. 167548–167548. 7 indexed citations
6.
Berg, G.P.A., R. J. deBoer, J. Görres, et al.. (2021). Neutron transfer studies on Mg25 and its correlation to neutron radiative capture processes. Physical review. C. 103(3). 6 indexed citations
7.
Berg, G.P.A., S. Noji, & R. G. T. Zegers. (2019). Ion-optical design of the high-rigidity spectrometer for FRIB. International Journal of Modern Physics A. 34(36). 1942017–1942017. 2 indexed citations
8.
Ko, B. R., K. Miki, Toshikazu Hashimoto, et al.. (2019). Excitation and $ \gamma$-decay coincidence measurements at the GRAF beamline for studies of pygmy and giant dipole resonances. The European Physical Journal A. 55(12). 4 indexed citations
9.
Talwar, R., B. P. Kay, A. J. Mitchell, et al.. (2017). High-j neutron excitations outside Xe136. Physical review. C. 96(2).
10.
Naviliat-Cuncic, O., D. Bazin, A. Gade, et al.. (2016). Toward a measurement of weak magnetism in 6He decay. Hyperfine Interactions. 237(1). 7 indexed citations
11.
Zegers, R. G. T., J. C. Hill, S. N. Liddick, et al.. (2016). Digital data acquisition for the Low Energy Neutron Detector Array (LENDA). Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 815. 1–6. 10 indexed citations
12.
Stroberg, S. R., A. Gade, J. A. Tostevin, et al.. (2015). Neutron single-particle strength in silicon isotopes: Constraining the driving forces of shell evolution. Physical Review C. 91(4). 9 indexed citations
13.
Stroberg, S. R., A. Gade, J. A. Tostevin, et al.. (2014). Single-particle structure of silicon isotopes approachingSi42. Physical Review C. 90(3). 26 indexed citations
14.
Riley, L. A., Michael L. Agiorgousis, T. Baugher, et al.. (2014). Inverse-kinematics proton scattering onCa50: Determining effective charges using complementary probes. Physical Review C. 90(1). 11 indexed citations
15.
Gade, A., T. Baugher, D. Bazin, et al.. (2013). Single-particle structure of silicon isotopes approaching 42 Si. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2013. 1 indexed citations
16.
Уесака, Т., Hiroaki Matsubara, K. Miki, et al.. (2012). New Experimental Studies of Nuclear Spin-Isospin Responses. Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement. 196. 150–157. 4 indexed citations
17.
Perdikakis, G., R. G. T. Zegers, Sam M. Austin, et al.. (2011). Gamow-Teller unit cross sections for (t,He3) and (He3,t) reactions. Physical Review C. 83(5). 15 indexed citations
18.
Guess, C. J., R. G. T. Zegers, B. A. Brown, et al.. (2009). Spectroscopy ofB13via theC13(t,He3)reaction at115AMeV. Physical Review C. 80(2). 11 indexed citations
19.
Guess, C. J., R. G. T. Zegers, B. A. Brown, et al.. (2009). Spectroscopy of 13B via the 13C(t,3He) reaction at 115 AMeV. ArXiv.org. 200(5). 358–358.
20.
Noji, S., K. Miki, K. Yako, et al.. (2007). Performance of neutron polarimeter SMART-NPOL. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 578(1). 267–278. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026