S. Maley

527 total citations
39 papers, 424 citations indexed

About

S. Maley is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Soil Science and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, S. Maley has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 424 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 28 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science, 21 papers in Soil Science and 17 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in S. Maley's work include Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (15 papers), Crop Yield and Soil Fertility (15 papers) and Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (13 papers). S. Maley is often cited by papers focused on Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (15 papers), Crop Yield and Soil Fertility (15 papers) and Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (13 papers). S. Maley collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and Russia. S. Maley's co-authors include E. Chakwizira, J. M. de Ruiter, Andrew Fletcher, Hamish Brown, Edmar Teixeira, D.R. Wilson, Alasdair Noble, Esther D. Meenken, R.F. Zyskowski and R. N. Gillespie and has published in prestigious journals such as Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Field Crops Research and Soil and Tillage Research.

In The Last Decade

S. Maley

35 papers receiving 384 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
S. Maley New Zealand	12	234	215	171	70	62	39	424
E. Chakwizira New Zealand	12	265 1.1×	277 1.3×	210 1.2×	79 1.1×	80 1.3×	39	493
Ann M. Johanns United States	3	173 0.7×	213 1.0×	139 0.8×	52 0.7×	74 1.2×	8	461
Silvia G. Assuero Argentina	12	148 0.6×	275 1.3×	109 0.6×	78 1.1×	112 1.8×	24	436
W. John Bullied Canada	11	223 1.0×	278 1.3×	171 1.0×	57 0.8×	42 0.7×	17	441
M. Anowarul Islam United States	11	211 0.9×	171 0.8×	111 0.6×	65 0.9×	69 1.1×	42	395
B. Kramberger Slovenia	10	167 0.7×	214 1.0×	181 1.1×	35 0.5×	50 0.8×	27	394
Abdel O. Mesbah United States	11	237 1.0×	233 1.1×	216 1.3×	42 0.6×	32 0.5×	27	438
C. B. Holzapfel Canada	11	185 0.8×	230 1.1×	163 1.0×	60 0.9×	28 0.5×	22	393
C. M. Cherr United States	7	238 1.0×	284 1.3×	248 1.5×	47 0.7×	39 0.6×	8	470
Ângelo Mendes Massignam Brazil	8	321 1.4×	477 2.2×	191 1.1×	30 0.4×	65 1.0×	22	602

Countries citing papers authored by S. Maley

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S. Maley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. Maley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. Maley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S. Maley

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. Maley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. Maley. The network helps show where S. Maley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of S. Maley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S. Maley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S. Maley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with S. Maley. S. Maley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Li, Jinbo, et al.. (2025). Catch crops promote soil physical recovery after forage crop grazing. Soil and Tillage Research. 255. 106778–106778.

Carey, Peter, B Malcolm, & S. Maley. (2022). Tillage practice and sowing time affect yield, nitrogen uptake and profitability of catch crops sown after winter forage grazing in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 66(5). 454–478. 1 indexed citations

Teixeira, Edmar, Paul Johnston, B Malcolm, et al.. (2022). Phenotyping early-vigour in oat cover crops to assess plant-trait effects across environments. Field Crops Research. 291. 108781–108781. 2 indexed citations

Maley, S., et al.. (2021). Water and nitrogen stress effects on canopy development and biomass allocation in fodder beet ( Beta vulgaris L.). New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 65(1). 63–81. 1 indexed citations

Brown, Hamish, et al.. (2021). Developing a method for integrating canopy measurements into evapotranspiration predictions. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 307. 108539–108539. 1 indexed citations

Brown, Hamish, et al.. (2020). Using infrared thermometry to improve irrigation scheduling on variable soils. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 307. 108033–108033. 8 indexed citations

Maley, S., et al.. (2019). Crop growth and development dynamics of two fodder beet ( Beta vulgaris L.) cultivars sown on different dates in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 63(3). 449–466. 3 indexed citations

Teixeira, Edmar, et al.. (2019). Water stress responses of three potato cultivars.. 49. 25–37. 6 indexed citations

Ruiter, J. M. de, B Malcolm, E. Chakwizira, et al.. (2018). Crop management effects on supplementary feed quality and crop options for dairy feeding to reduce nitrate leaching. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 62(3). 369–398. 5 indexed citations

10.

Chakwizira, E., et al.. (2017). Radiation use efficiency and biomass partitioning to storage roots in fodder beet crops. European Journal of Agronomy. 92. 63–71. 7 indexed citations

11.

Chakwizira, E., J. M. de Ruiter, S. Maley, & Edmar Teixeira. (2016). Evaluating the critical nitrogen dilution curve for storage root crops. Field Crops Research. 199. 21–30. 20 indexed citations

12.

Chakwizira, E., et al.. (2015). Effects of nitrogen fertiliser application rate on nitrogen partitioning, nitrogen use efficiency and nutritive value of forage kale. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 58(3). 259–270. 13 indexed citations

13.

Chakwizira, E., et al.. (2014). Growth, nitrogen partitioning and nutritive value of fodder beet crops grown under different application rates of nitrogen fertiliser. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 57(2). 75–89. 20 indexed citations

14.

Chakwizira, E., et al.. (2014). Water use efficiency of fodder beet crops. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association. 76. 125–134. 12 indexed citations

15.

Meenken, Esther D., et al.. (2014). POTENTIAL FOR MUNICIPAL COMPOST TO REDUCE INORGANIC FERTILISER USE IN CROP PRODUCTION SYSTEMS. Acta Horticulturae. 315–323.

16.

Chakwizira, E., et al.. (2013). Effects of potassium, sodium and chloride fertiliser rates on fodder beet yield and quality in Canterbury. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association. 261–270. 13 indexed citations

17.

Fletcher, Andrew, et al.. (2010). Drought response and water use efficiency of forage brassica crops.. 40. 105–117. 7 indexed citations

18.

Beare, Mike, et al.. (2010). Nitrate leaching from high production forage crop sequences. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association. 23–28. 8 indexed citations

19.

Fletcher, Andrew, D.R. Wilson, S. Maley, John McCallum, & Martin Shaw. (2010). The effect of sulphur and nitrogen fertiliser on levels of anti-nutritional compounds in kale. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association. 79–84. 5 indexed citations

20.

Martin, R. J., R. N. Gillespie, S. Maley, et al.. (2003). Effect of timing and intensity of drought on the seed yield of white clover (Trifolium repens L.).. 0–4. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact