S. M. Pulst

474 total citations
10 papers, 306 citations indexed

About

S. M. Pulst is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, S. M. Pulst has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 306 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Molecular Biology, 3 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 3 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in S. M. Pulst's work include Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (3 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (2 papers) and Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (2 papers). S. M. Pulst is often cited by papers focused on Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (3 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (2 papers) and Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (2 papers). S. M. Pulst collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and Japan. S. M. Pulst's co-authors include Daniel H. Geschwind, Lucy J. Treiman, Raji P. Grewal, Julie R. Korenberg, T Pribýl, Daniel L. Van Dyke, Lawrence M. Weiss, J. Kraus, D R Marshak and Mon‐Li Chu and has published in prestigious journals such as Neurology, Human Molecular Genetics and Human Genetics.

In The Last Decade

S. M. Pulst

9 papers receiving 292 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
S. M. Pulst United States 6 226 220 109 55 28 10 306
Karina Häbig Germany 7 190 0.8× 231 1.1× 131 1.2× 35 0.6× 26 0.9× 9 344
Emilia K. Bijlsma Netherlands 10 295 1.3× 273 1.2× 141 1.3× 47 0.9× 17 0.6× 15 395
Tania Cruz Mariño Canada 9 209 0.9× 185 0.8× 113 1.0× 53 1.0× 26 0.9× 27 289
Sophie Carré France 6 97 0.4× 128 0.6× 38 0.3× 33 0.6× 45 1.6× 13 316
Conneally Pm United States 5 147 0.7× 193 0.9× 68 0.6× 105 1.9× 6 0.2× 8 321
Mika H. Martikainen Finland 13 95 0.4× 205 0.9× 130 1.2× 47 0.9× 42 1.5× 34 418
Gameil T. Fouad United States 6 168 0.7× 233 1.1× 58 0.5× 30 0.5× 6 0.2× 7 310
Katherine Berry United States 7 174 0.8× 74 0.3× 89 0.8× 28 0.5× 73 2.6× 8 288
Mark T. Rogers United Kingdom 9 143 0.6× 153 0.7× 57 0.5× 35 0.6× 49 1.8× 11 279
Ulrike Thies Germany 10 141 0.6× 258 1.2× 67 0.6× 126 2.3× 4 0.1× 19 357

Countries citing papers authored by S. M. Pulst

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S. M. Pulst's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. M. Pulst with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. M. Pulst more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S. M. Pulst

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. M. Pulst. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. M. Pulst. The network helps show where S. M. Pulst may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of S. M. Pulst

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S. M. Pulst. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S. M. Pulst based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with S. M. Pulst. S. M. Pulst is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Stévanin, Giovanni, Sylvie Forlani, C. Cazeneuve, et al.. (2009). Conventional mutations are associated with a different phenotype than polyglutamine expansions in spinocerebellar ataxias. 16. 284–284. 5 indexed citations
2.
Korenberg, Julie R., Hiroko Kawashima, S. M. Pulst, et al.. (2005). Down syndrome: Toward a molecular definition of the phenotype. American Journal of Medical Genetics. 37(S7). 91–97. 13 indexed citations
3.
Grewal, Raji P., et al.. (1998). Clinical and genetic analysis of a distinct autosomal dominant spinocerebellar ataxia. Neurology. 51(5). 1423–1426. 51 indexed citations
4.
Geschwind, Daniel H., et al.. (1997). The prevalence and wide clinical spectrum of the spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 trinucleotide repeat in patients with autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia.. PubMed. 60(4). 842–50. 189 indexed citations
5.
Sainz, Jesús, M E Baser, Nicola Ragge, Rebecca A. Nelson, & S. M. Pulst. (1993). Loss of Alleles in Vestibular Schwannomas: Use of Microsatellite Markers on Chromosome 22. Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. 119(12). 1285–1288. 6 indexed citations
6.
Sainz, Jesús, Mette Rasmussen, Alex Nechiporuk, et al.. (1993). Dinucleotide repeat polymorphism at the D22S351 locus. Human Molecular Genetics. 2(10). 1749–1749. 7 indexed citations
7.
Pribýl, T, S. M. Pulst, Daniel L. Van Dyke, et al.. (1992). Stable ring chromosome 21: Molecular and clinical definition of the lesion. American Journal of Medical Genetics. 42(1). 22–28. 31 indexed citations
8.
Pulst, S. M., Pamela R. Fain, V H Cohn, et al.. (1991). Exclusion of linkage to the pericentromeric region of chromosome 21 in the Canadian pedigree with familial Alzheimer disease. Human Genetics. 87(2). 159–161. 2 indexed citations
9.
Mautner, Victor F., et al.. (1991). [Neurofibromatosis: current clinical and molecular genetic aspects from the neurologic viewpoint].. PubMed. 62(6). 340–8.
10.
Mautner, Victor‐Felix & S. M. Pulst. (1989). Schematic representation of NF-1 clinical features in German.. PubMed. 2(3). 176–7. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026