S. K. Oh

16.3k total citations
33 papers, 404 citations indexed

About

S. K. Oh is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, S. K. Oh has authored 33 papers receiving a total of 404 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 33 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 13 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 1 paper in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. Recurrent topics in S. K. Oh's work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (32 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (17 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (13 papers). S. K. Oh is often cited by papers focused on Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (32 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (17 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (13 papers). S. K. Oh collaborates with scholars based in South Korea, Germany and United Kingdom. S. K. Oh's co-authors include S. W. Ham, D. C. Son, Yu Seon Jeong, D. C. Son, Dong-Chul Son, J. Kim, Seung‐Hyun Kim, Ji‐Hyun Im, Astrid Stephan and Pyungwon Ko and has published in prestigious journals such as Physics Letters B, Journal of High Energy Physics and The European Physical Journal C.

In The Last Decade

S. K. Oh

33 papers receiving 393 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
S. K. Oh South Korea 13 394 220 10 8 4 33 404
Sogee Spinner United States 13 453 1.1× 154 0.7× 14 1.4× 15 1.9× 5 1.3× 28 462
Subhendu Rakshit India 10 423 1.1× 187 0.8× 8 0.8× 5 0.6× 6 1.5× 21 426
Bogumiła Świeżewska Poland 9 319 0.8× 237 1.1× 6 0.6× 5 0.6× 4 1.0× 14 339
P. N. Pandita India 12 458 1.2× 174 0.8× 4 0.4× 8 1.0× 5 1.3× 35 463
Gregory Peim United States 11 473 1.2× 330 1.5× 11 1.1× 5 0.6× 5 1.3× 13 478
AseshKrishna Datta India 15 625 1.6× 221 1.0× 11 1.1× 10 1.3× 2 0.5× 29 627
Luis A. Sánchez Colombia 13 447 1.1× 99 0.5× 11 1.1× 10 1.3× 7 1.8× 20 465
Sujeet Akula United States 8 358 0.9× 239 1.1× 17 1.7× 6 0.8× 6 1.5× 8 365
Sean Fraser United States 7 261 0.7× 130 0.6× 13 1.3× 7 0.9× 4 1.0× 8 277
Achille Corsetti India 4 475 1.2× 301 1.4× 7 0.7× 3 0.4× 6 1.5× 5 477

Countries citing papers authored by S. K. Oh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S. K. Oh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. K. Oh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. K. Oh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S. K. Oh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. K. Oh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. K. Oh. The network helps show where S. K. Oh may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of S. K. Oh

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S. K. Oh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S. K. Oh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with S. K. Oh. S. K. Oh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ham, S. W. & S. K. Oh. (2010). Exotic quark effects on the Higgs sector of the USSM at the LHC. Journal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle Physics. 37(4). 45003–45003. 2 indexed citations
2.
Oh, S. K., et al.. (2010). Electroweak Phase Transition and Higgs Self-couplings in the Two-Higgs-doublet Model. Journal of the Korean Physical Society. 56(5). 1436–1440. 2 indexed citations
3.
Ham, S. W., et al.. (2009). Explicit CP violation in the Dine–Seiberg–Thomas model. The European Physical Journal C. 65(3-4). 517–522. 2 indexed citations
4.
Ham, S. W., et al.. (2009). Possibility of spontaneousCPviolation in Higgs physics beyond the minimal supersymmetric standard model. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 80(5). 6 indexed citations
5.
Ham, S. W., et al.. (2008). Higgs bosons of a supersymmetricU(1)model at the International Linear Collider. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 77(11). 3 indexed citations
6.
Ham, S. W., et al.. (2008). Neutral scalar Higgs bosons in the USSM at the LHC. Journal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle Physics. 35(9). 95007–95007. 7 indexed citations
7.
Ham, S. W., et al.. (2008). Higgs bosons of a supersymmetricE6model at the Large Hadron Collider. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2008(12). 17–17. 12 indexed citations
8.
Ham, S. W., et al.. (2007). ExplicitCPviolation in a MSSM with an extraU(1). Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 76(1). 14 indexed citations
9.
Ham, S. W., S. K. Oh, & D. C. Son. (2005). Electroweak phase transition in the minimal supersymmetric standard model with four generations. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 71(1). 26 indexed citations
10.
Ham, S. W., Yu Seon Jeong, & S. K. Oh. (2005). Electroweak phase transition in an extension of the standard model with a real Higgs singlet. Journal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle Physics. 31(8). 857–871. 62 indexed citations
11.
Ham, S. W., et al.. (2004). Neutral Higgs bosons in non-minimal supersymmetric models with arbitrary number of Higgs singlets. arXiv (Cornell University). 1 indexed citations
12.
Ham, S. W. & S. K. Oh. (2004). Electroweak phase transition in the standard model with a dimension-six Higgs operator at the one-loop level. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 70(9). 19 indexed citations
13.
Ham, S. W., et al.. (2003). Neutral Higgs boson masses of the MSSM at the one-loop level in an explicitCPviolation scenario. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 68(5). 30 indexed citations
14.
Ham, S. W., et al.. (2002). The one-loop correction to the neutral Higgs boson of the minimal supersymmetric standard model in explicit CP violation scenario. arXiv (Cornell University). 2 indexed citations
15.
Ham, S. W., S. K. Oh, & D. C. Son. (2002). Neutral Higgs sector of the next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model with explicitCPviolation. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 65(7). 28 indexed citations
16.
Ham, S. W., et al.. (2002). Possibility of spontaneousCPviolation in the nonminimal supersymmetric standard model with two neutral Higgs singlets. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 66(1). 5 indexed citations
17.
Ham, S. W., et al.. (2000). Spontaneous violation of theCPsymmetry in the Higgs sector of the next-to-minimal supersymmetric model. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 61(5). 19 indexed citations
18.
Ham, S. W., et al.. (1998). Higgs particle production at e+e−-colliders and the RG-improved nonlinear supersymmetric standard model. Physics Letters B. 441(1-4). 215–223. 1 indexed citations
19.
Oh, S. K., et al.. (1996). Dirac-Square-Root formulation of some types of minisuperspace quantum cosmology.. 29(4). 549–553. 3 indexed citations
20.
Oh, S. K.. (1984). Mass of the top quark in the standard six-quark model. Journal of Physics G Nuclear Physics. 10(10). 1335–1345. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026