S. D. Fink

665 total citations
29 papers, 303 citations indexed

About

S. D. Fink is a scholar working on Inorganic Chemistry, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering and Materials Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, S. D. Fink has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 303 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Inorganic Chemistry, 15 papers in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering and 15 papers in Materials Chemistry. Recurrent topics in S. D. Fink's work include Radioactive element chemistry and processing (20 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Characterization (15 papers) and Radioactive contamination and transfer (8 papers). S. D. Fink is often cited by papers focused on Radioactive element chemistry and processing (20 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Characterization (15 papers) and Radioactive contamination and transfer (8 papers). S. D. Fink collaborates with scholars based in United States. S. D. Fink's co-authors include D.T. Hobbs, Harry C. Hershey, T. B. Peters, F. F. Fondeur, J. P. Bradley, Douglas B. Hunter, Z. R. Dai, Martine C. Duff, D.D. Walker and Kathryn M. Marshall and has published in prestigious journals such as Environmental Science & Technology, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research and Separation Science and Technology.

In The Last Decade

S. D. Fink

25 papers receiving 296 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
S. D. Fink United States 8 190 148 133 58 51 29 303
James T.M. Amphlett South Korea 10 273 1.4× 196 1.3× 154 1.2× 50 0.9× 197 3.9× 27 534
B. Sreenivasulu India 13 359 1.9× 136 0.9× 199 1.5× 34 0.6× 146 2.9× 41 426
Christopher A. Zarzana United States 11 274 1.4× 162 1.1× 202 1.5× 36 0.6× 83 1.6× 26 356
M. J. Carrott United Kingdom 12 378 2.0× 144 1.0× 263 2.0× 90 1.6× 124 2.4× 21 498
Emily L. Campbell United States 11 223 1.2× 113 0.8× 136 1.0× 44 0.8× 131 2.6× 25 369
P.K. Dey India 13 274 1.4× 161 1.1× 120 0.9× 66 1.1× 243 4.8× 33 528
S. A. Kulyukhin Russia 10 254 1.3× 138 0.9× 295 2.2× 13 0.2× 44 0.9× 141 416
K. N. Sabharwal India 14 383 2.0× 223 1.5× 150 1.1× 26 0.4× 219 4.3× 24 453
Yu. M. Kulyako Russia 11 316 1.7× 138 0.9× 291 2.2× 50 0.9× 96 1.9× 65 495
M. Ziyad France 12 82 0.4× 81 0.5× 168 1.3× 100 1.7× 54 1.1× 23 374

Countries citing papers authored by S. D. Fink

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S. D. Fink's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. D. Fink with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. D. Fink more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S. D. Fink

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. D. Fink. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. D. Fink. The network helps show where S. D. Fink may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of S. D. Fink

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S. D. Fink. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S. D. Fink based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with S. D. Fink. S. D. Fink is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Fink, S. D.. (2014). Fact, Fiction, and History in Philip Roth's "Eli, the Fanatic". MELUS Multi-Ethnic Literature of the United States. 39(3). 89–111. 1 indexed citations
2.
Moyer, Bruce A., Peter V. Bonnesen, Lætitia H. Delmau, et al.. (2011). Development of the Next-Generation Caustic-Side Solvent Extraction (NG-CSSX) Process for Cesium Removal from High-Level Tank Waste. 6 indexed citations
3.
Poirier, M.R., et al.. (2010). Removal of Sludge Heels in Savannah River Site Waste Tanks withOxalicAcid. Separation Science and Technology. 45(12-13). 1858–1875. 8 indexed citations
4.
Fondeur, F. F., et al.. (2010). Thermal Analysis and Chemical Compatibility of ReillexTMHPQ Resin and Nitric Acid with Ethylene Glycol. Separation Science and Technology. 45(12-13). 1841–1848. 1 indexed citations
5.
Peters, T. B., M.R. Poirier, F. F. Fondeur, et al.. (2009). Separation of Fission Products and Actinides From Savannah River Site High-Level Nuclear Wastes. 601–610. 2 indexed citations
6.
Poirier, M.R., et al.. (2009). Testing of a Rotary Microfilter for Hanford Applications - 9121. 1 indexed citations
7.
8.
Poirier, M.R., T. B. Peters, Steven J Brown, et al.. (2008). Full-Scale Testing of a Caustic Side Solvent Extraction System to Remove Cesium from Savannah River Site Radioactive Waste. Separation Science and Technology. 43(9-10). 2797–2813. 10 indexed citations
9.
Fondeur, F. F., D.T. Hobbs, & S. D. Fink. (2008). Thermal and Spectroscopic Analyses of Caustic Side Solvent Extraction Solvent Contacted with 16 Molar and 8 Molar Nitric Acid. Separation Science and Technology. 43(9-10). 2826–2839. 1 indexed citations
10.
Peters, T. B., et al.. (2006). Copper‐Catalyzed Peroxide Oxidation Testing for Tetraphenylborate Decomposition. Separation Science and Technology. 41(11). 2299–2312. 1 indexed citations
11.
Peters, T. B., et al.. (2006). Strontium and Actinide Separations from High Level Nuclear Waste Solutions Using Monosodium Titanate 2. Actual Waste Testing. Separation Science and Technology. 41(11). 2409–2427. 23 indexed citations
12.
Peters, T. B., D.T. Hobbs, & S. D. Fink. (2006). Determination of Actinide Loadings onto Monosodium Titanate (MST) under Conditions Relevant to the Actinide Removal Process Facility. Separation Science and Technology. 41(11). 2447–2460. 2 indexed citations
13.
Fondeur, F. F., et al.. (2005). Sorption Modeling of Strontium, Plutonium, Uranium, and Neptunium Adsorption on Monosodium Titanate. Separation Science and Technology. 40(1-3). 571–592. 6 indexed citations
14.
Hobbs, D.T., et al.. (2005). Strontium and Actinide Separations from High Level Nuclear Waste Solutions Using Monosodium Titanate 1. Simulant Testing. Separation Science and Technology. 40(15). 3093–3111. 44 indexed citations
15.
Fink, S. D., et al.. (2003). Overview of Fiscal Year 2002 Research and Development for Savannah River Site's Salt Waste Processing Facility. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas).
17.
Fondeur, F. F., et al.. (2003). The Effect Of Carbonate, Oxalate, And Peroxide On The Cesium Loading Of Ionsiv®Ie-910 And Ie-911. Separation Science and Technology. 38(12-13). 3175–3188. 4 indexed citations
18.
Fink, S. D.. (2002). Demonstration of Cesium Removal Technologies Using High-Level Waste in Support of the Salt Processing Project at the Savannah River Site. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).
19.
Fondeur, F. F., D.D. Walker, W.R. Wilmarth, & S. D. Fink. (2001). THE EFFECT OF PRESSURE, HUMIDITY, CAUSTIC PRETREATMENT, AND ORGANIC CONSTITUENTS ON THE CESIUM ION EXCHANGE PERFORMANCE OF IONSIV® IE-911. Separation Science and Technology. 36(16). 3599–3615. 3 indexed citations
20.
Fink, S. D. & Harry C. Hershey. (1990). Modeling the vapor-liquid equilibria of 1,1,1-trichloroethane + carbon dioxide and toluene + carbon dioxide at 308, 323, and 353 K. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 29(2). 295–306. 51 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026