S. C. Prager

3.6k total citations
130 papers, 2.5k citations indexed

About

S. C. Prager is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Materials Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, S. C. Prager has authored 130 papers receiving a total of 2.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 117 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 84 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 24 papers in Materials Chemistry. Recurrent topics in S. C. Prager's work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (116 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (79 papers) and Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (37 papers). S. C. Prager is often cited by papers focused on Magnetic confinement fusion research (116 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (79 papers) and Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (37 papers). S. C. Prager collaborates with scholars based in United States, Italy and Germany. S. C. Prager's co-authors include J. S. Sarff, G. Fiksel, M. R. Stoneking, D. J. Den Hartog, Hantao Ji, A. F. Almagri, D. Craig, B. E. Chapman, C. R. Sovinec and S. Hokin and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, The Astrophysical Journal and Physics Today.

In The Last Decade

S. C. Prager

126 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
S. C. Prager United States 29 2.3k 1.8k 423 316 305 130 2.5k
T. R. Jarboe United States 24 2.1k 0.9× 1.4k 0.8× 429 1.0× 381 1.2× 441 1.4× 144 2.3k
D. Monticello United States 27 2.2k 0.9× 1.7k 0.9× 176 0.4× 294 0.9× 368 1.2× 79 2.3k
D.C. Robinson United Kingdom 23 1.6k 0.7× 1.0k 0.6× 247 0.6× 255 0.8× 324 1.1× 59 1.9k
A. Janos United States 22 1.8k 0.8× 1.1k 0.6× 163 0.4× 525 1.7× 285 0.9× 63 1.9k
D. J. Den Hartog United States 26 1.8k 0.8× 1.1k 0.6× 467 1.1× 276 0.9× 193 0.6× 144 2.0k
A. Fukuyama Japan 28 2.5k 1.1× 1.6k 0.9× 319 0.8× 567 1.8× 436 1.4× 227 2.7k
J. A. Holmes United States 24 1.7k 0.8× 1.1k 0.6× 308 0.7× 172 0.5× 279 0.9× 103 2.1k
K. Toi Japan 26 1.9k 0.8× 1.2k 0.7× 228 0.5× 526 1.7× 285 0.9× 141 2.1k
K. McGuire United States 25 2.0k 0.9× 1.3k 0.7× 172 0.4× 483 1.5× 313 1.0× 67 2.1k
B. N. Rogers United States 16 2.4k 1.0× 2.0k 1.1× 144 0.3× 551 1.7× 217 0.7× 23 2.6k

Countries citing papers authored by S. C. Prager

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S. C. Prager's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. C. Prager with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. C. Prager more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S. C. Prager

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. C. Prager. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. C. Prager. The network helps show where S. C. Prager may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of S. C. Prager

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S. C. Prager. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S. C. Prager based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with S. C. Prager. S. C. Prager is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Tharp, T. D., et al.. (2010). Measurements of nonlinear Hall-driven reconnection in the reversed field pinch. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 52. 3 indexed citations
2.
Ding, W. X., D. L. Brower, G. Fiksel, et al.. (2009). Magnetic-Fluctuation-Induced Particle Transport and Density Relaxation in a High-Temperature Plasma. Physical Review Letters. 103(2). 25001–25001. 17 indexed citations
3.
Gangadhara, S., D. Craig, D.A. Ennis, et al.. (2007). Spatially Resolved Measurements of Ion Heating during Impulsive Reconnection in the Madison Symmetric Torus. Physical Review Letters. 98(7). 75001–75001. 17 indexed citations
4.
Ebrahimi, F., V.V. Mirnov, S. C. Prager, & C. R. Sovinec. (2007). Momentum Transport from Current-Driven Reconnection in the Reversed Field Pinch. Physical Review Letters. 99(7). 75003–75003. 13 indexed citations
5.
Wyman, Max, B. E. Chapman, S. C. Prager, et al.. (2005). Density Control and Limit(s) in MST. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 47.
6.
Fiksel, G., B. Hudson, D. J. Den Hartog, et al.. (2005). Observation of Weak Impact of a Stochastic Magnetic Field on Fast-Ion Confinement. Physical Review Letters. 95(12). 125001–125001. 28 indexed citations
7.
Anderson, J. K., T. M. Biewer, C. B. Forest, et al.. (2003). Dynamo-free plasma in the reversed field pinch. APS Division of Plasma Physics Meeting Abstracts. 45. 1 indexed citations
8.
Crocker, N. A., G. Fiksel, S. C. Prager, & J. S. Sarff. (2003). Measurement of the Current Sheet during Magnetic Reconnection in a Toroidal Plasma. Physical Review Letters. 90(3). 35003–35003. 22 indexed citations
9.
Biewer, T. M., C. B. Forest, J. K. Anderson, et al.. (2003). Electron Heat Transport Measured in a Stochastic Magnetic Field. Physical Review Letters. 91(4). 45004–45004. 54 indexed citations
10.
Ding, W. X., D. L. Brower, S. D. Terry, et al.. (2003). Measurement of Internal Magnetic Field Fluctuations in a Reversed-Field Pinch by Faraday Rotation. Physical Review Letters. 90(3). 35002–35002. 45 indexed citations
11.
Prager, S. C.. (2002). Magnetic self-organization in fusion plasmas:understanding and control. APS Division of Plasma Physics Meeting Abstracts. 44.
12.
Brower, D. L., W. X. Ding, S. D. Terry, et al.. (2002). Measurement of the Current-Density Profile and Plasma Dynamics in the Reversed-Field Pinch. Physical Review Letters. 88(18). 185005–185005. 41 indexed citations
13.
Chapman, B. E., J. K. Anderson, T. M. Biewer, et al.. (2001). Reduced Edge Instability and Improved Confinement in the MST Reversed-Field Pinch. Physical Review Letters. 87(20). 205001–205001. 54 indexed citations
14.
Hartog, D. J. Den, et al.. (2000). Spectroscopic Observation of Fluctuation-Induced Dynamo in the Edge of the Reversed-Field Pinch. Physical Review Letters. 85(3). 566–569. 37 indexed citations
15.
Lanier, N. E., D. Craig, J. K. Anderson, et al.. (1999). Electron Density Fluctuations and Fluctuation Induced Transport in the Reversed-Field Pinch. APS. 41. 912. 2 indexed citations
16.
Almagri, A.F., et al.. (1998). Locking of multiple resonant mode structures in the reversed-field pinch. Physics of Plasmas. 5(8). 2942–2946. 21 indexed citations
17.
Assadi, S., et al.. (1992). Measurement of nonlinear mode coupling of tearing fluctuations. Physical Review Letters. 69(2). 281–284. 44 indexed citations
18.
Mattor, Nathan, P. W. Terry, & S. C. Prager. (1991). Anomalous ion heating from the dynamo in a reversed field pinch. 15(2). 65–75. 11 indexed citations
19.
Dexter, R. N., et al.. (1984). Polarized electron cyclotron emission in the Tokapole II Tokamak. Unknow. 1 indexed citations
20.
Phillips, Michael, et al.. (1983). Stability analysis of experimental high-beta toroidal plasmas. Nuclear Fusion. 23(12). 1561–1574. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026