S. Brunsting

1.6k total citations
33 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

S. Brunsting is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Environmental Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, S. Brunsting has authored 33 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 6 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and 6 papers in Environmental Engineering. Recurrent topics in S. Brunsting's work include Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy (16 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (7 papers) and Environmental Education and Sustainability (6 papers). S. Brunsting is often cited by papers focused on Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy (16 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (7 papers) and Environmental Education and Sustainability (6 papers). S. Brunsting collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Italy. S. Brunsting's co-authors include Tom Postmes, Marjolein de Best-Waldhober, T. Mikunda, Bas van den Putte, Marco Yzer, Hauke Riesch, Christian Oltra, Paul Upham, Elisabeth Dütschke and David Reiner and has published in prestigious journals such as Renewable Energy, BMC Public Health and Preventive Medicine.

In The Last Decade

S. Brunsting

32 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
S. Brunsting Netherlands 17 765 355 172 150 130 33 1.2k
Endre Tvinnereim Norway 18 544 0.7× 63 0.2× 284 1.7× 155 1.0× 21 0.2× 37 989
Dancker D.L. Daamen Netherlands 19 945 1.2× 43 0.1× 467 2.7× 208 1.4× 148 1.1× 28 1.4k
Tang Yao China 17 293 0.4× 39 0.1× 40 0.2× 76 0.5× 27 0.2× 57 1.0k
Dimitrios Xenias United Kingdom 13 457 0.6× 36 0.1× 295 1.7× 135 0.9× 83 0.6× 19 952
Matthew A. Shapiro United States 14 362 0.5× 260 0.7× 109 0.6× 63 0.4× 4 0.0× 38 801
Gerdien de Vries Netherlands 14 290 0.4× 42 0.1× 186 1.1× 87 0.6× 15 0.1× 41 830
Angelo Antoci Italy 18 328 0.4× 95 0.3× 128 0.7× 42 0.3× 9 0.1× 99 1.0k
Jonathan Marshall Australia 13 269 0.4× 33 0.1× 31 0.2× 114 0.8× 27 0.2× 72 805
Ge Wang China 16 367 0.5× 238 0.7× 26 0.2× 48 0.3× 6 0.0× 49 1.1k
Will Rifkin Australia 16 194 0.3× 33 0.1× 79 0.5× 124 0.8× 49 0.4× 40 830

Countries citing papers authored by S. Brunsting

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S. Brunsting's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. Brunsting with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. Brunsting more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S. Brunsting

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. Brunsting. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. Brunsting. The network helps show where S. Brunsting may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of S. Brunsting

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S. Brunsting. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S. Brunsting based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with S. Brunsting. S. Brunsting is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Brunsting, S., et al.. (2018). Modelling consumer decisions towards sustainable energy technology. TNO Repository. 1 indexed citations
2.
Cuppen, Eefje, et al.. (2015). How stakeholder interactions can reduce space for moral considerations in decision making: A contested CCS project in the Netherlands. Environment and Planning A Economy and Space. 47(9). 1963–1978. 36 indexed citations
3.
Pearce, Jonathan, Maxine Akhurst, Carsten M. Nielsen, et al.. (2015). SiteChar – Methodology for a Fit-for-Purpose Assessment of CO2Storage Sites in Europe. Oil & Gas Science and Technology – Revue d’IFP Energies nouvelles. 70(4). 531–554. 8 indexed citations
4.
Brunsting, S., Marjolein de Best-Waldhober, & Bart W. Terwel. (2013). ‘I Reject your Reality and Substitute my Own!’ Why More Knowledge about CO2 Storage Hardly Improves Public Attitudes. Energy Procedia. 37. 7419–7427. 28 indexed citations
5.
Brunsting, S., et al.. (2013). SiteChar Characterisation of European CO2 Storage: Deliverable N° D8.3 Public Outreach Activities. ERA. 4 indexed citations
6.
Brunsting, S., et al.. (2013). Social Site Characterisation for CO2 Storage Operations to Inform Public Engagement in Poland and Scotland. Energy Procedia. 37. 7327–7336. 14 indexed citations
7.
Oltra, Christian, Paul Upham, Hauke Riesch, et al.. (2012). Public Responses to Co2 Storage Sites: Lessons from Five European Cases. Energy & Environment. 23(2-3). 227–248. 64 indexed citations
8.
Best-Waldhober, Marjolein de, et al.. (2012). Public concepts of CCS: Understanding of the Dutch general public and its reflection in the media. International journal of greenhouse gas control. 11. S139–S147. 20 indexed citations
9.
Brunsting, S., et al.. (2012). SiteChar D8.2. Characterisation of European CO2 storage, trust building and raising public awareness. TNO Repository. 1 indexed citations
10.
Brunsting, S., et al.. (2011). Stakeholder participation practices and onshore CCS: Lessons from the dutch CCS case barendrecht. Energy Procedia. 4. 6376–6383. 96 indexed citations
11.
Upham, Paul, et al.. (2011). Public Perceptions of CCS: The results of NearCO2 European Focus Groups. TNO Repository. 5 indexed citations
12.
Brunsting, S., et al.. (2011). A communications theory approach to project planning for carbon capture and storage. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 2 indexed citations
13.
Brunsting, S., Paul Upham, Elisabeth Dütschke, et al.. (2011). Communicating CCS: Applying communications theory to public perceptions of carbon capture and storage. International journal of greenhouse gas control. 5(6). 1651–1662. 45 indexed citations
14.
Brunsting, S., et al.. (2010). Stakeholder Participation and Onshore CCS: Lessons from the Dutch CCS Case Barendrecht. 5 indexed citations
15.
Upham, Paul, Hauke Riesch, David Reiner, et al.. (2010). Review of the public participation practices for CCS and non-CCS projects in Europe. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 31 indexed citations
16.
Kramer, Jeannet, et al.. (2009). Effectiveness of a web-based self-help smoking cessation intervention: protocol of a randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 9(1). 32–32. 6 indexed citations
17.
Putte, Bas van den, Marco Yzer, & S. Brunsting. (2004). Social influences on smoking cessation: a comparison of the effect of six social influence variables. Preventive Medicine. 41(1). 186–193. 91 indexed citations
18.
Brunsting, S.. (2003). Healthy Stimulants. Motivating Online Health Information Seeking Through Traditional Mass Media. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 1 indexed citations
19.
Brunsting, S. & Tom Postmes. (2002). Social Movement Participation in the Digital Age. Small Group Research. 33(5). 525–554. 195 indexed citations
20.
Postmes, Tom & S. Brunsting. (2002). Collective Action in the Age of the Internet. Social Science Computer Review. 20(3). 290–301. 153 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026