Ryan Copping

691 citations
9 papers · 384 · 1 hit paper · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Ryan Copping

9 papers receiving 374 citations

Ryan Copping's Hit Papers

Evaluating eligibility criteria of oncology trials using real-world data and AI 2021 · 201 citations
2010+1+3Years since publication50100150200

Peers

Ryan Copping
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Health Informatics 55
  • Statistics and Probability 88
  • Cancer Research 49
  • Health Information Management 12
  • Economics and Econometrics 64
Replace Brandon Arnieri with:
Brandon Arnieri United States
Samuel Whipple United States
Navdeep Pal United States
Arturo López Pineda United States
Jacqueline Corrigan‐Curay United States
G. Caleb Alexander United States
Hanzhe Zhang China
Travis Osterman United States
Christine M. Cutillo United States
Melissa D. Curtis United States
Ryan Copping relative to Brandon Arnieri United States Brandon Arnieri's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Brandon Arnieri · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ryan Copping

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ryan Copping's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ryan Copping with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ryan Copping more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ryan Copping

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ryan Copping. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ryan Copping. The network helps show where Ryan Copping may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ryan Copping, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ryan Copping Line = papers co-authored together Ryan Copping links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1
Evaluating eligibility criteria of oncology trials using real-world data and AI
Hit paper breakdown →
2021201
2 201973
3 202336
4 202126
5 202222
6 202215
7 20249
8 20241
9 20201

About Ryan Copping

Ryan Copping is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Cancer Research, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Artificial Intelligence and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 9 papers that have together received 384 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (4 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (3 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (2 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (1 paper), Ferroptosis and cancer prognosis (1 paper), Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (1 paper) and Health and Medical Research Impacts (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (55 citations), Statistics and Probability (88 citations), Cancer Research (49 citations), Health Information Management (12 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (64 citations). Ryan Copping has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and France. Frequent co-authors include William B. Capra, Brandon Arnieri, Samuel Whipple, Michael W. Lu, James Zou, Ruishan Liu, Navdeep Pal, Shemra Rizzo, Ying Lü and Arturo López Pineda. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, Nature Medicine, Nature, Annals of Oncology and Statistics in Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact