Ruth van der Gaag

1.0k citations
26 papers · 780 indexed · h-index 15

Ruth van der Gaag

25 papers receiving 749 citations

Peers

Ruth van der Gaag
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Ophthalmology 216
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 349
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 230
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 219
  • Neurology 90
Replace N. Matheis with:
N. Matheis Germany
Claudio Guastella Italy
Iris M.M.J. Wakelkamp Netherlands
Michele M. Bloomer United States
P Meyer United Kingdom
Fady Joseph United Kingdom
Alec Garner United Kingdom
Selçuk Sızmaz Türkiye
Peter H. Morse United States
Merih Soylu Türkiye
Ruth van der Gaag relative to N. Matheis Germany N. Matheis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
N. Matheis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth van der Gaag

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth van der Gaag's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth van der Gaag with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth van der Gaag more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth van der Gaag

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth van der Gaag. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth van der Gaag. The network helps show where Ruth van der Gaag may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruth van der Gaag, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ruth van der Gaag Line = papers co-authored together Ruth van der Gaag links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20150
2 200428
3 20034
4 200325
5 199832
6 199810
7 199734
8 199663
9 19964
10 199414
11 199416
12 19925
13 19911
14 199098
15 1989251
16 198714
17 198624
18 198448
19 19754
20
The role of Peyer's patch cells in antibody formation.
197315

About Ruth van der Gaag

Ruth van der Gaag is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Immunology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 26 papers that have together received 780 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corneal Surgery and Treatments (9 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (8 papers), Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (5 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (4 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (4 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (4 papers), Ocular Infections and Treatments (2 papers) and Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (216 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (349 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (230 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (219 citations) and Neurology (90 citations). Ruth van der Gaag has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Portugal and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Leo Koornneef, Maarten P. Mourits, Mark F. Prummel, Arie Berghout, Wilmar M. Wiersinga, Eric P. Krenning, Elisabeth Pels, L Broersma, Alex F. de Vos and Gabriël van Rij. Their work appears in journals such as Current Eye Research, Experimental Eye Research, Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, Cancer and Cornea.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026