Ruth Stewart

2.8k total citations · 1 hit paper
75 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

Ruth Stewart is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Management Science and Operations Research and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Ruth Stewart has authored 75 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 32 papers in General Health Professions, 16 papers in Management Science and Operations Research and 13 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Ruth Stewart's work include Health Policy Implementation Science (17 papers), Evaluation and Performance Assessment (15 papers) and Community Development and Social Impact (11 papers). Ruth Stewart is often cited by papers focused on Health Policy Implementation Science (17 papers), Evaluation and Performance Assessment (15 papers) and Community Development and Social Impact (11 papers). Ruth Stewart collaborates with scholars based in South Africa, United Kingdom and Canada. Ruth Stewart's co-authors include Carina van Rooyen, Thea de Wet, Sandy Oliver, Laurenz Langer, Kristin Liabo, Katrina Hargreaves, Jenny Caird, Chris Hyde, Julie Parkes and Ruairidh Milne and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.

In The Last Decade

Ruth Stewart

69 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

The Impact of Microfinance in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review of the Evidence

2012 341 citations Carina van Rooyen, Ruth Stewart et al. profile →

Peers

Ruth Stewart

GHP

EE

SR

PHEOH

SPS

Thea de Wet South Africa

Ephraim Chirwa Malawi

Shin‐Yi Chou United States

Martina Vojtkova United Kingdom

Rasheda Khanam Australia

Marianne Bitler United States

John W. McArthur United States

David Newhouse United States

Alayne M. Adams Bangladesh

Hugh Waddington United Kingdom

Thea de Wet South Africa

Ruth Stewart

299 ×0.5

GHP

477 ×0.9

EE

290 ×1.4

SR

330 ×1.7

PHEOH

164 ×0.9

SPS

Citations per year, relative to Ruth Stewart Ruth Stewart (= 1×) peers Thea de Wet

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Stewart

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Stewart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Stewart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Stewart more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Stewart

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Stewart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Stewart. The network helps show where Ruth Stewart may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth Stewart

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth Stewart. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth Stewart based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth Stewart. Ruth Stewart is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Lavis, John N., et al.. (2024). SHOW ME the evidence: Features of an approach to reliably deliver research evidence to those who need it. 1(5).

2.

Stewart, Ruth, et al.. (2023). Resilience and Sub-optimal Social Determinants of Health. Primary Care Clinics in Office Practice. 50(4). 689–698. 3 indexed citations

3.

Cockburn, Lynn, et al.. (2023). Invited to dinner, but not to the table: web content accessibility evaluation for persons with disabilities. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 7(1). 1 indexed citations

4.

Stewart, Ruth, Jeffrey K Aronson, Eric Barends, et al.. (2022). Lessons from working across fields to develop a framework for informed choices. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 6(1).

5.

Langer, Laurenz, et al.. (2018). Women in wage labour: A systematic review of the Effectiveness and Design Features of Interventions Supporting Women’s Participation in Wage Labour in Higher-growth and/or Male-dominated Sectors in Low- and Middle-income Countries. UCL Discovery (University College London). 2 indexed citations

6.

Roulstone, Alan, et al.. (2015). Interventions to improve the labour market situation of adults with physical and/or sensory disabilities in low- and middle-income countries. UCL Discovery (University College London). 2 indexed citations

7.

Stewart, Ruth, et al.. (2015). The Effects of Training, Innovation and New Technology on African Smallholder Farmers' Wealth and Food Security: A Systematic Review. Campbell Systematic Reviews. 11(16). 10 indexed citations

8.

Tripney, Janice, et al.. (2015). Interventions to Improve the Labour Market Situation of Adults with Physical and/or Sensory Disabilities in Low‐ and Middle‐Income Countries: A Systematic Review. Campbell Systematic Reviews. 11(1). 1–127. 15 indexed citations

9.

Stewart, Ruth, et al.. (2015). The Effects of Training, Innovation and New Technology on African Smallholder Farmers' Economic Outcomes and Food Security: A Systematic Review. Campbell Systematic Reviews. 11(1). 1–224. 37 indexed citations

10.

Oliver, Sandy, Mukdarut Bangpan, Claire Stansfield, & Ruth Stewart. (2015). Capacity for conducting systematic reviews in low- and middle-income countries: a rapid appraisal. Health Research Policy and Systems. 13(1). 23–23. 36 indexed citations

11.

Stewart, Ruth, et al.. (2014). PROTOCOL: The Effects of Training, Innovation and New Technology on African Smallholder Farmers' Wealth and Food Security: A Systematic Review. Campbell Systematic Reviews. 10(1). 1–87. 5 indexed citations

12.

Tripney, Janice, Alan Roulstone, Carol Vigurs, et al.. (2013). Protocol for a Systematic Review: Interventions to Improve the Labour Market Situation of Adults with Physical and/or Sensory Disabilities in Low‐ and Middle‐Income Countries. Campbell Systematic Reviews. 9(1). 1–65. 5 indexed citations

13.

Stewart, Ruth, et al.. (2011). Participative Research and Policy. 3(2). 145. 1 indexed citations

14.

Stewart, Ruth, Jenny Caird, Kathryn Oliver, & Sandy Oliver. (2010). Patients’ and clinicians’ research priorities. Health Expectations. 14(4). 439–448. 88 indexed citations

15.

Hargreaves, Katrina, et al.. (2006). Health visitors' role in newborn blood spot screening.. PubMed. 79(7). 221–4. 1 indexed citations

16.

Stewart, Ruth & Sandy Oliver. (2006). Reviewing the potential for critical appraisal training to cater for professional practice. Medical Teacher. 28(2). e74–e79. 4 indexed citations

17.

Stewart, Ruth, et al.. (2005). Newborn blood spot screening.. PubMed. 8(5). 216–8. 8 indexed citations

18.

Hargreaves, Katrina, Ruth Stewart, & Sandy Oliver. (2005). Informed choice and public health screening for children: the case of blood spot screening. Health Expectations. 8(2). 161–171. 45 indexed citations

19.

Stewart, Ruth, Meg Wiggins, James Thomas, et al.. (2005). Exploring the Evidence-Practice Gap: A Workshop Report on Mixed and Participatory Training for HIV Prevention in Southern Africa. Education for Health. 18(2). 224–235. 10 indexed citations

20.

Stewart, Ruth. (1998). Management theory. More art than science?. PubMed. 108(5597). 28–9. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact