Ruth J. Mitchell

3.5k citations
79 papers · 2.3k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

Ruth J. Mitchell

75 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Ruth J. Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 976
  • Soil Science 418
  • Ecology 1.1k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 631
  • Ecological Modeling 134
Replace Kathrin Kiehl with:
Kathrin Kiehl Germany
Pia Parolin Germany
Eric G. Lamb Canada
George B. Chuyong Cameroon
Jes Hines Germany
Stephanie G. Yelenik United States
Michael D. Madritch United States
En‐Rong Yan China
Ondřej Mudrák Czechia
Till Kleinebecker Germany
Ruth J. Mitchell relative to Kathrin Kiehl Germany Kathrin Kiehl's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Kathrin Kiehl · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth J. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth J. Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth J. Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth J. Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth J. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth J. Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth J. Mitchell. The network helps show where Ruth J. Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruth J. Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ruth J. Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Ruth J. Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 79 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997113
2 2010107
3 201699
4 200690
5 202087
6 200683
7 200079
8 200778
9 200570
10 200469
11 200968
12 201466
13 200565
14 199865
15 199959
16 198459
17 200351
18 201150
19 200748
20 200447

About Ruth J. Mitchell

Ruth J. Mitchell is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science and Insect Science, having authored 79 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (38 papers), Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (15 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (14 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (12 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (12 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (11 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (10 papers) and Rangeland and Wildlife Management (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (976 citations), Soil Science (418 citations), Ecology (1.1k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (631 citations) and Ecological Modeling (134 citations). Ruth J. Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and Finland. Frequent co-authors include R.H. Marrs, M.G. Le Duc, Stephen J. Chapman, Richard L. Hewison, Susan E. Hartley, Anne-Marie Truscott, Alison J. Hester, Colin D. Campbell, Clare Cameron and Jacqueline M. Potts. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Conservation, Journal of Ecology, Journal of Applied Ecology, Environmental Pollution and Plant and Soil.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact