Ruth Horn

935 total citations
43 papers, 515 citations indexed

About

Ruth Horn is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Ruth Horn has authored 43 papers receiving a total of 515 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 16 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 12 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Ruth Horn's work include Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (15 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (10 papers) and Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (8 papers). Ruth Horn is often cited by papers focused on Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (15 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (10 papers) and Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (8 papers). Ruth Horn collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and France. Ruth Horn's co-authors include Angeliki Kerasidou, Michael Parker, Hilary Bowman‐Smart, Claudia Wiesemann, Richard Huxtable, Ralf J. Jox, Sero Andonian, Luca Marelli, Katharina Kieslich and Federica Lucivero and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition.

In The Last Decade

Ruth Horn

41 papers receiving 494 citations

Peers

Ruth Horn

PHEOH

PPCH

GHP

GENET

Nülüfer Erbi̇l Türkiye

Padaphet Sayakhot Australia

Anthony L. Back United States

Caren J. Frost United States

Suzanne M. Miller United States

Jessica Berg United States

Daniela Leone Italy

Sareh Dashti Iran

Sandra Ieropoli Australia

Lei‐Shih Chen United States

Nülüfer Erbi̇l Türkiye

Ruth Horn

247 ×1.2

PHEOH

43 ×0.2

PPCH

167 ×1.2

GHP

38 ×0.4

GENET

112 ×1.6

Citations per year, relative to Ruth Horn Ruth Horn (= 1×) peers Nülüfer Erbi̇l

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Horn

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Horn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Horn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Horn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Horn

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Horn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Horn. The network helps show where Ruth Horn may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth Horn

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth Horn. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth Horn based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth Horn. Ruth Horn is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Raz, Aviad E., et al.. (2025). Expanded Prenatal Genomic Testing: Reproductive Autonomy Can Go in More than One Way. The American Journal of Bioethics. 25(12). 75–76.

Bowman‐Smart, Hilary, et al.. (2025). Women’s wellbeing as an empty declaration? A qualitative exploration of challenges in accessing termination of pregnancy due to fetal anomaly in Germany. BMC Medical Ethics. 26(1). 40–40. 1 indexed citations

Horn, Ruth, et al.. (2025). More of the same? Israel’s expanded carrier screening for cystic fibrosis. European Journal of Human Genetics. 33(12). 1555–1557. 1 indexed citations

Horn, Ruth, et al.. (2025). The value of large-scale programmes in human genomics. European Journal of Human Genetics. 33(5). 563–569.

Horn, Ruth, et al.. (2024). Ethical considerations in prenatal genomic testing. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 97. 102548–102548. 3 indexed citations

Horn, Ruth, Jennifer Merchant, Mark Bale, et al.. (2024). Ethical and social implications of public–private partnerships in the context of genomic/big health data collection. European Journal of Human Genetics. 32(6). 736–741. 4 indexed citations

Bowman‐Smart, Hilary, et al.. (2024). Supporting patient decision-making in non-invasive prenatal testing: a comparative study of professional values and practices in England and France. BMC Medical Ethics. 25(1). 34–34. 4 indexed citations

Raz, Aviad E., et al.. (2023). Old and new challenges regarding comparable and viable data sharing in population-scale genomic research. European Journal of Human Genetics. 31(6). 617–618. 1 indexed citations

Clarke, Angus, et al.. (2023). Women's preferences for NIPT as a first‐line test in England and France: Challenges for genetic counseling practices. Journal of Genetic Counseling. 33(6). 1204–1214. 3 indexed citations

10.

Kieslich, Katharina, Amelia Fiske, Susi Geiger, et al.. (2023). Solidarity during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from a nine-country interview study in Europe. Medical Humanities. 49(4). 511–520. 9 indexed citations

11.

Horn, Ruth, et al.. (2022). Preserving women’s reproductive autonomy while promoting the rights of people with disabilities?: the case of Heidi Crowter and Maire Lea-Wilson in the light of NIPT debates in England, France and Germany. Journal of Medical Ethics. 49(7). 471–473. 6 indexed citations

12.

Horn, Ruth, et al.. (2022). Health professionals and scientists’ views on genome-wide NIPT in the French public health system: Critical analysis of the ethical issues raised by prenatal genomics. PLoS ONE. 17(11). e0277010–e0277010. 9 indexed citations

13.

Horn, Ruth. (2022). NIPT and the concerns regarding ‘routinisation’. European Journal of Human Genetics. 30(6). 637–638. 14 indexed citations

14.

Horn, Ruth, et al.. (2021). The ethical landscape(s) of non-invasive prenatal testing in England, France and Germany: findings from a comparative literature review. European Journal of Human Genetics. 30(6). 676–681. 27 indexed citations

15.

Lewis, Celine, James Buchanan, Angus Clarke, et al.. (2021). Mixed-methods evaluation of the NHS Genomic Medicine Service for paediatric rare diseases: study protocol. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1. 23–23. 4 indexed citations

16.

Horn, Ruth & Michael Parker. (2018). Health professionals' and researchers' perspectives on prenatal whole genome and exome sequencing: 'We can't shut the door now, the genie's out, we need to refine it'. PLoS ONE. 13(9). e0204158–e0204158. 22 indexed citations

17.

Horn, Ruth. (2014). “I don’t need my patients’ opinion to withdraw treatment”: patient preferences at the end-of-life and physician attitudes towards advance directives in England and France. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy. 17(3). 425–435. 16 indexed citations

18.

Horn, Ruth, et al.. (2013). Le droit de mourir : choisir sa fin de vie en France et en Allemagne. OPUS (Augsburg University). 3 indexed citations

19.

Horn, Ruth. (2011). Euthanasia and end-of-life practices in France and Germany. A comparative study. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy. 16(2). 197–209. 12 indexed citations

20.

Horn, Ruth. (1994). Managed Care: Implications for Underrepresented Physicians. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved. 5(3). 154–157. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact