Ruth E. Propper

2.5k total citations
48 papers, 1.8k citations indexed

About

Ruth E. Propper is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Ruth E. Propper has authored 48 papers receiving a total of 1.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 41 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 11 papers in Social Psychology and 11 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Ruth E. Propper's work include Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience (27 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (9 papers) and Action Observation and Synchronization (8 papers). Ruth E. Propper is often cited by papers focused on Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience (27 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (9 papers) and Action Observation and Synchronization (8 papers). Ruth E. Propper collaborates with scholars based in United States and Switzerland. Ruth E. Propper's co-authors include Stephen D. Christman, Eric C. Prichard, Robert Stickgold, Kilian Garvey, Matthew A. Tucker, Tad T. Brunyé, Jessica D. Payne, Daniel L. Schacter, Matthew P. Walker and Erin J. Wamsley and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Psychological Science and SLEEP.

In The Last Decade

Ruth E. Propper

45 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ruth E. Propper United States 20 1.4k 519 344 272 200 48 1.8k
Stephen D. Christman United States 32 2.2k 1.5× 703 1.4× 614 1.8× 432 1.6× 215 1.1× 85 2.6k
So Kanazawa Japan 22 1.3k 0.9× 487 0.9× 327 1.0× 185 0.7× 54 0.3× 119 1.7k
Yiying Song China 23 1.2k 0.8× 524 1.0× 240 0.7× 87 0.3× 196 1.0× 61 1.5k
John G. Neuhoff United States 22 1.5k 1.0× 973 1.9× 524 1.5× 82 0.3× 154 0.8× 52 2.1k
Μαριέττα Παπαδάτου-Παστού Greece 22 1.1k 0.7× 268 0.5× 285 0.8× 295 1.1× 113 0.6× 56 1.5k
James C. Bartlett United States 33 2.6k 1.9× 963 1.9× 602 1.8× 322 1.2× 83 0.4× 69 3.2k
William Overman United States 24 1.1k 0.8× 402 0.8× 272 0.8× 439 1.6× 237 1.2× 41 2.1k
Alan Beaton United Kingdom 19 893 0.6× 328 0.6× 131 0.4× 700 2.6× 101 0.5× 52 1.6k
Marco Hirnstein Norway 22 851 0.6× 290 0.6× 164 0.5× 155 0.6× 49 0.2× 44 1.3k
Lauren Julius Harris United States 25 1.3k 0.9× 346 0.7× 380 1.1× 509 1.9× 57 0.3× 75 1.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth E. Propper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth E. Propper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth E. Propper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth E. Propper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth E. Propper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth E. Propper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth E. Propper. The network helps show where Ruth E. Propper may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth E. Propper

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth E. Propper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth E. Propper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth E. Propper. Ruth E. Propper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Propper, Ruth E., et al.. (2023). Excitatory Dorsal Lateral Prefrontal Cortex Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Increases Social Anxiety. Brain Sciences. 13(7). 989–989. 5 indexed citations
2.
Christman, Stephen D., et al.. (2016). The contributions of handedness and working memory to episodic memory. Memory & Cognition. 44(8). 1149–1156. 13 indexed citations
3.
Propper, Ruth E., et al.. (2015). Lateralized differences in tympanic membrane temperature, but not induced mood, are related to episodic memory. Brain and Cognition. 94. 52–59. 2 indexed citations
4.
Cavanagh, Sarah R., et al.. (2014). Hemispheric Bases for Emotion and Memory. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 8. 997–997. 2 indexed citations
5.
Propper, Ruth E. & Tad T. Brunyé. (2013). Lateralized Difference in Tympanic Membrane Temperature: Emotion and Hemispheric Activity. Frontiers in Psychology. 4. 104–104. 16 indexed citations
6.
Propper, Ruth E., et al.. (2013). Getting a Grip on Memory: Unilateral Hand Clenching Alters Episodic Recall. PLoS ONE. 8(4). e62474–e62474. 23 indexed citations
7.
Prichard, Eric C., Ruth E. Propper, & Stephen D. Christman. (2013). Degree of Handedness, but not Direction, is a Systematic Predictor of Cognitive Performance. Frontiers in Psychology. 4. 9–9. 142 indexed citations
8.
Pace‐Schott, Edward F., E Shepherd, Rebecca M. C. Spencer, et al.. (2010). Napping promotes inter-session habituation to emotional stimuli. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory. 95(1). 24–36. 86 indexed citations
9.
Payne, Jessica D., Daniel L. Schacter, Ruth E. Propper, et al.. (2009). The role of sleep in false memory formation. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory. 92(3). 327–334. 183 indexed citations
10.
Propper, Ruth E. & Stephen D. Christman. (2008). Interhemispheric Interaction and Saccadic Horizontal Eye MovementsImplications for Episodic Memory, EMDR, and PTSD. Journal of EMDR Practice and Research. 2(4). 269–281. 42 indexed citations
11.
Propper, Ruth E., et al.. (2007). Effect of Bilateral Eye Movements on Frontal Interhemispheric Gamma EEG Coherence. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 195(9). 785–788. 54 indexed citations
12.
Christman, Stephen D., et al.. (2006). Increased interhemispheric interaction is associated with earlier offset of childhood amnesia.. Neuropsychology. 20(3). 336–345. 76 indexed citations
13.
Propper, Ruth E., et al.. (2005). A mixed-handed advantage in episodic memory: A possible role of interhemispheric interaction. Memory & Cognition. 33(4). 751–757. 120 indexed citations
14.
Propper, Ruth E., et al.. (2004). An assessment of sleep architecture as a function of degree of handedness in college women using a home sleep monitor. Brain and Cognition. 54(3). 186–197. 16 indexed citations
15.
Christman, Stephen D., et al.. (2004). Increased interhemispheric interaction is associated with decreased false memories in a verbal converging semantic associates paradigm. Brain and Cognition. 56(3). 313–319. 113 indexed citations
16.
Christman, Stephen D., et al.. (2003). Bilateral eye movements enhance the retrieval of episodic memories.. Neuropsychology. 17(2). 221–229. 174 indexed citations
17.
Christman, Stephen D. & Ruth E. Propper. (2001). Superior episodic memory is associated with interhemispheric processing.. Neuropsychology. 15(4). 607–616. 69 indexed citations
18.
Stickgold, Robert, et al.. (2001). Brain-Mind States: I. Longitudinal Field Study of Sleep/Wake Factors Influencing Mentation Report Length. SLEEP. 24(2). 171–179. 91 indexed citations
19.
Allen, Philip A., Miron Kaufman, Albert F. Smith, & Ruth E. Propper. (1998). A molar entropy model of age differences in spatial memory.. Psychology and Aging. 13(3). 501–518. 31 indexed citations
20.
Wallace, Benjamin, Philip A. Allen, & Ruth E. Propper. (1996). Hypnotic Susceptibility, Imaging Ability, and Anagram-Solving Activity. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis. 44(4). 324–337. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026