Ruth E. McDonald

2.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
8 papers, 931 citations indexed

About

Ruth E. McDonald is a scholar working on Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change and Oceanography. According to data from OpenAlex, Ruth E. McDonald has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 931 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Atmospheric Science, 7 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 2 papers in Oceanography. Recurrent topics in Ruth E. McDonald's work include Climate variability and models (7 papers), Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research (5 papers) and Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (4 papers). Ruth E. McDonald is often cited by papers focused on Climate variability and models (7 papers), Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research (5 papers) and Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (4 papers). Ruth E. McDonald collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Ruth E. McDonald's co-authors include C. A. Senior, Simon J. Brown, James M. Murphy, Richard Wood, Glen Harris, Ag Stephens, Mark McCarthy, Craig Wallace, Richard Betts and Geoff Jenkins and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Journal of Climate and Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society.

In The Last Decade

Ruth E. McDonald

8 papers receiving 875 citations

Hit Papers

UK Climate Projections Science Report: Climate Change Pro... 2009 2026 2014 2020 2009 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ruth E. McDonald United Kingdom 7 628 449 145 111 107 8 931
Stefan Gollvik Sweden 12 947 1.5× 760 1.7× 196 1.4× 189 1.7× 109 1.0× 20 1.3k
Robert V. Rohli United States 19 720 1.1× 524 1.2× 102 0.7× 86 0.8× 118 1.1× 105 1.1k
Mike Kendon United Kingdom 13 514 0.8× 304 0.7× 127 0.9× 73 0.7× 71 0.7× 30 751
Atsamon Limsakul Thailand 18 587 0.9× 333 0.7× 109 0.8× 152 1.4× 158 1.5× 48 910
Gillian Kay United Kingdom 13 690 1.1× 395 0.9× 199 1.4× 56 0.5× 64 0.6× 24 1.0k
Adina‐Eliza Croitoru Romania 18 741 1.2× 359 0.8× 144 1.0× 60 0.5× 186 1.7× 42 1.1k
Anthony Argüez United States 13 942 1.5× 685 1.5× 113 0.8× 255 2.3× 114 1.1× 27 1.4k
Kevin Sieck Germany 13 599 1.0× 517 1.2× 80 0.6× 66 0.6× 65 0.6× 21 803
Daniela C. A. Lima Portugal 19 595 0.9× 490 1.1× 59 0.4× 225 2.0× 138 1.3× 41 951
Mustapha El Maayar Canada 11 580 0.9× 238 0.5× 125 0.9× 39 0.4× 119 1.1× 14 872

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth E. McDonald

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth E. McDonald's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth E. McDonald with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth E. McDonald more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth E. McDonald

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth E. McDonald. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth E. McDonald. The network helps show where Ruth E. McDonald may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth E. McDonald

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth E. McDonald. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth E. McDonald based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth E. McDonald. Ruth E. McDonald is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Priestley, Matthew D. K., Duncan Ackerley, Jennifer L. Catto, et al.. (2020). An Overview of the Extratropical Storm Tracks in CMIP6 Historical Simulations. Journal of Climate. 33(15). 6315–6343. 124 indexed citations
2.
Senior, C. A., Timothy Andrews, Chantelle Burton, et al.. (2016). Idealized climate change simulations with a high‐resolution physical model: HadGEM3‐GC2. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems. 8(2). 813–830. 31 indexed citations
3.
Sánchez, Claudio, K. D. Williams, G. J. Shutts, et al.. (2012). Towards the development of a robust model hierarchy: investigation of dynamical limitations at low resolution and possible solutions. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. 139(670). 75–84. 5 indexed citations
4.
Brown, Simon J., et al.. (2010). Future changes in tropical cyclone genesis in fully dynamic ocean- and mixed layer ocean-coupled climate models: a low-resolution model study. Climate Dynamics. 37(3-4). 737–758. 13 indexed citations
5.
McDonald, Ruth E.. (2010). Understanding the impact of climate change on Northern Hemisphere extra-tropical cyclones. Climate Dynamics. 37(7-8). 1399–1425. 43 indexed citations
6.
Murphy, James M., David M. H. Sexton, Geoff Jenkins, et al.. (2009). UK Climate Projections Science Report: Climate Change Projections. UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia). 534 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
McDonald, Ruth E., et al.. (2005). Tropical storms: representation and diagnosis in climate models and the impacts of climate change. Climate Dynamics. 25(1). 19–36. 99 indexed citations
8.
Gillett, Nathan P., Myles Allen, Ruth E. McDonald, et al.. (2002). How linear is the Arctic Oscillation response to greenhouse gases?. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 107(D3). 82 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026