Ruth Bishop

413 total citations
8 papers, 310 citations indexed

About

Ruth Bishop is a scholar working on Surgery, Parasitology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Ruth Bishop has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 310 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Surgery, 3 papers in Parasitology and 2 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in Ruth Bishop's work include Intestinal Malrotation and Obstruction Disorders (3 papers), Vector-borne infectious diseases (3 papers) and Down syndrome and intellectual disability research (2 papers). Ruth Bishop is often cited by papers focused on Intestinal Malrotation and Obstruction Disorders (3 papers), Vector-borne infectious diseases (3 papers) and Down syndrome and intellectual disability research (2 papers). Ruth Bishop collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Kenya and South Africa. Ruth Bishop's co-authors include Vishvanath Nene, A.J. Musoke, Malcolm J. Gardner, P.R. Spooner, Christopher Oura, George W. Lubega, A. Tait, Richard Laugharne, Rohit Shankar and Amy M. Russell and has published in prestigious journals such as Parasitology, International Journal of Medical Informatics and Journal of Intellectual Disability Research.

In The Last Decade

Ruth Bishop

7 papers receiving 295 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ruth Bishop United Kingdom 6 222 158 121 73 35 8 310
Rovaina Laureano Doyle Brazil 11 196 0.9× 61 0.4× 106 0.9× 98 1.3× 85 2.4× 39 342
Nicole R. Hasenkampf United States 8 271 1.2× 45 0.3× 223 1.8× 53 0.7× 95 2.7× 12 318
Simon Peter Musinguzi Uganda 11 133 0.6× 113 0.7× 79 0.7× 92 1.3× 90 2.6× 27 346
Nathalie Boulanger France 9 181 0.8× 55 0.3× 154 1.3× 84 1.2× 51 1.5× 21 288
Yeon‐Joo Choi South Korea 12 289 1.3× 138 0.9× 225 1.9× 46 0.6× 65 1.9× 26 328
R.S. Silayo Tanzania 10 146 0.7× 134 0.8× 82 0.7× 47 0.6× 89 2.5× 21 320
Melissa M. Kemperman United States 7 365 1.6× 83 0.5× 322 2.7× 50 0.7× 179 5.1× 9 413
Vera Preac Mursic Germany 6 312 1.4× 71 0.4× 258 2.1× 63 0.9× 42 1.2× 6 344
Michaela Kubelová Czechia 9 222 1.0× 122 0.8× 178 1.5× 52 0.7× 22 0.6× 11 277
Katarzyna Kubiak Poland 10 210 0.9× 101 0.6× 178 1.5× 32 0.4× 22 0.6× 29 271

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Bishop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Bishop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Bishop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Bishop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Bishop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Bishop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Bishop. The network helps show where Ruth Bishop may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth Bishop

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth Bishop. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth Bishop based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth Bishop. Ruth Bishop is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Bishop, Ruth, et al.. (2025). Serious Games for constipation management for people with intellectual disabilities: A scoping review and narrative synthesis. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 196. 105832–105832.
2.
Bishop, Ruth, Richard Laugharne, Sandra E. Ward, et al.. (2024). Laxative use in adults with intellectual disabilities: development of prescribing guidelines. BJPsych Open. 10(3). e84–e84. 2 indexed citations
3.
Laugharne, Richard, Indermeet Sawhney, Bhathika Perera, et al.. (2024). Chronic constipation in people with intellectual disabilities in the community: cross-sectional study. BJPsych Open. 10(2). e55–e55. 7 indexed citations
4.
Bishop, Ruth, Richard Laugharne, Nick Shaw, et al.. (2023). The inclusion of adults with intellectual disabilities in health research – challenges, barriers and opportunities: a mixed‐method study among stakeholders in England. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research. 68(2). 140–149. 27 indexed citations
5.
Laugharne, Richard, Michael Wilcock, Jessica M. B. Rees, et al.. (2023). Clinical characteristics of people with intellectual disability admitted to hospital with constipation: identifying possible specific high‐risk factors. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research. 68(3). 277–284. 8 indexed citations
6.
Oura, Christopher, et al.. (2007). Theileria parva live vaccination: parasite transmission, persistence and heterologous challenge in the field. Parasitology. 134(9). 1205–1213. 44 indexed citations
7.
Bishop, Ruth, et al.. (2004). Theileria: intracellular protozoan parasites of wild and domestic ruminants transmitted by ixodid ticks. Parasitology. 129(S1). S271–S283. 209 indexed citations
8.
Bishop, Ruth, B.A. Allsopp, P.R. Spooner, et al.. (1995). Theileria: Improved Species Discrimination Using Oligonucleotides Derived from Large Subunit Ribosomal RNA Sequences. Experimental Parasitology. 80(1). 107–115. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026