Russell D. Hamer

1.9k total citations
49 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Russell D. Hamer is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Russell D. Hamer has authored 49 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 31 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 12 papers in Molecular Biology and 11 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in Russell D. Hamer's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (27 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (12 papers) and Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (11 papers). Russell D. Hamer is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (27 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (12 papers) and Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (11 papers). Russell D. Hamer collaborates with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Australia. Russell D. Hamer's co-authors include Christopher W. Tyler, Anthony M. Norcia, Christopher W. Tyler, Ronald T. Verrillo, Jozef J. Zwislocki, W. Wesemann, Davida Y. Teller, Marilyn E. Schneck, Daniel Tranchina and Dora Fix Ventura and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Experimental Brain Research and IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

In The Last Decade

Russell D. Hamer

44 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Russell D. Hamer United States 22 895 355 301 257 240 49 1.4k
Thom Carney United States 24 1.3k 1.4× 263 0.7× 194 0.6× 199 0.8× 245 1.0× 61 1.6k
Saumil S. Patel United States 20 1.2k 1.3× 274 0.8× 266 0.9× 663 2.6× 181 0.8× 71 1.8k
Heidi A. Baseler United Kingdom 17 1.2k 1.3× 507 1.4× 142 0.5× 156 0.6× 366 1.5× 43 1.6k
K.H. Ruddock United Kingdom 24 1.5k 1.6× 401 1.1× 211 0.7× 272 1.1× 237 1.0× 85 2.1k
Janine D. Mendola United States 19 2.5k 2.8× 341 1.0× 344 1.1× 189 0.7× 239 1.0× 48 2.9k
Xoana G. Troncoso United States 15 1.3k 1.4× 211 0.6× 111 0.4× 214 0.8× 264 1.1× 28 1.6k
Jian Ding United States 16 1.4k 1.6× 153 0.4× 492 1.6× 257 1.0× 272 1.1× 53 1.7k
Chang‐Bing Huang China 23 1.5k 1.6× 226 0.6× 800 2.7× 183 0.7× 420 1.8× 54 1.8k
Martina Poletti United States 17 1.4k 1.5× 417 1.2× 161 0.5× 195 0.8× 258 1.1× 46 1.7k
Harry J. Wyatt United States 23 933 1.0× 641 1.8× 147 0.5× 551 2.1× 450 1.9× 52 1.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Russell D. Hamer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Russell D. Hamer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Russell D. Hamer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Russell D. Hamer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Russell D. Hamer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Russell D. Hamer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Russell D. Hamer. The network helps show where Russell D. Hamer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Russell D. Hamer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Russell D. Hamer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Russell D. Hamer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Russell D. Hamer. Russell D. Hamer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Hamer, Russell D.. (2024). The Surreal Art of Rene Magritte and Visual Processing: Analysis of Two Iconic Paintings. Electronic Imaging. 36(11). 205–1.
3.
Tyler, Christopher W., et al.. (2023). Evidence for a second rod pathway in the human retina with a cone-like spectral sensitivity. Journal of Vision. 23(9). 5784–5784.
4.
Feitosa-Santana, Cláudia, Marcelo Fernandes Costa, Henrique Ballalai Ferraz, et al.. (2020). Visual losses in early-onset and late-onset Parkinson’s disease. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 37(5). A285–A285. 7 indexed citations
5.
Lima, Diego Jorge Maia, Russell D. Hamer, Marcelo Fernandes Costa, et al.. (2020). Longitudinal visual acuity development in ZIKV-exposed children. Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. 24(1). 23.e1–23.e6. 7 indexed citations
6.
Hamer, Russell D., Givago da Silva Souza, David H. Peterzell, et al.. (2016). Analysis of individual and spatiotemporal variability in human cortical contrast response functions: further evaluation of separable high and low contrast processes. Journal of Vision. 16(12). 878–878. 3 indexed citations
7.
Gualtieri, Mirella, Marina Bandeira, Russell D. Hamer, et al.. (2008). Psychophysical analysis of contrast processing segregated into magnocellular and parvocellular systems in asymptomatic carriers of 11778 Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy. Visual Neuroscience. 25(3). 469–474. 14 indexed citations
8.
Navid, Ali, et al.. (2006). A proposed role for all-trans retinal in regulation of rhodopsin regeneration in human rods. Vision Research. 46(27). 4449–4463. 4 indexed citations
9.
Hamer, Russell D., et al.. (2003). Multiple Steps of Phosphorylation of Activated Rhodopsin Can Account for the Reproducibility of Vertebrate Rod Single-photon Responses. The Journal of General Physiology. 122(4). 419–444. 68 indexed citations
11.
Norcia, Anthony M., Russell D. Hamer, Arthur Jampolsky, & Deborah Orel‐Bixler. (1995). Plasticity of human motion processing mechanisms following surgery for infantile esotropia. Vision Research. 35(23-24). 3279–3296. 33 indexed citations
12.
Hamer, Russell D. & Anthony M. Norcia. (1994). The development of motion sensitivity during the first year of life. Vision Research. 34(18). 2387–2402. 39 indexed citations
13.
Lasley, David J., et al.. (1991). Postural stability and stereo-ambiguity in man-designed visual environments. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 38(8). 808–813. 1 indexed citations
14.
Tyler, Christopher W., et al.. (1990). Development of contrast sensitivity in the human infant. Vision Research. 30(10). 1475–1486. 167 indexed citations
15.
Norcia, Anthony M., Christopher W. Tyler, Russell D. Hamer, & W. Wesemann. (1989). Measurement of spatial contrast sensitivity with the swept contrast VEP. Vision Research. 29(5). 627–637. 115 indexed citations
16.
Hamer, Russell D., et al.. (1989). The development of monocular and binocular VEP acuity. Vision Research. 29(4). 397–408. 50 indexed citations
17.
Hamer, Russell D., et al.. (1989). Polaroid Photorefractive Screening of Infants. Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus. 26(5). 254–260. 33 indexed citations
18.
Pagon, Roberta A, et al.. (1988). Heterozygote detection in X-linked recessive incomplete achromatopsia. Ophthalmic Paediatrics and Genetics. 9(1). 43–56. 6 indexed citations
19.
Tyler, Christopher W., Anthony M. Norcia, & Russell D. Hamer. (1987). Two Mechanisms Revealed by Sweep VEP Contrast Functions in Infants. MB2–MB2. 1 indexed citations
20.
Gescheider, George A., Anthony J. Capraro, Robert D. Frisina, Russell D. Hamer, & Ronald T. Verrillo. (1978). The effects of a surround on vibrotactile thresholds.. PubMed. 2(2). 99–115. 49 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026