Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The sulfide system: a new biotic community underneath the oxidized layer of marine sand bottoms
1970409 citationsRupert Riedl et al.Marine Biologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Rupert Riedl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rupert Riedl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rupert Riedl more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rupert Riedl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rupert Riedl. The network helps show where Rupert Riedl may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rupert Riedl
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rupert Riedl.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rupert Riedl based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Rupert Riedl. Rupert Riedl is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Zellner, Micha el & Rupert Riedl. (2005). [Urinary diversion after cystectomy: aspects of quality of life and options for rehabilitation].. Urologe A. 44(1). 46–50.4 indexed citations
Riedl, Rupert, et al.. (1996). Das Weltbild der modernen Physik im Lichte der konstruktivistischen EE.1 indexed citations
4.
Riedl, Rupert. (1992). Wahrheit und Wahrscheinlichkeit: biologische Grundlagen des Für-Wahr-Nehmens.3 indexed citations
5.
Riedl, Rupert, et al.. (1990). Evolution und Selbstbezug des Erkennens. Böhlau eBooks.1 indexed citations
6.
Riedl, Rupert, et al.. (1988). Biologie der Erkenntnis : die stammesgeschichtlichen Grundlagen der Vernunft. Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag eBooks.34 indexed citations
7.
Riedl, Rupert. (1988). Der Wiederaufbau des Menschlichen. Piper eBooks.
8.
Riedl, Rupert, Franz M. Wuketits, & William Warren Bartley. (1987). Die Evolutionäre Erkenntnistheorie : Bedingungen, Lösungen, Kontroversen.5 indexed citations
9.
Riedl, Rupert. (1987). Kultur, Spätzündung der Evolution? : Antworten auf Fragen an die Evolutions- und Erkenntnistheorie. Piper eBooks.1 indexed citations
10.
Riedl, Rupert. (1987). Begriff und Welt.3 indexed citations
11.
Riedl, Rupert, et al.. (1987). Entwicklung der Evolutionären Erkenntnistheorie.1 indexed citations
Riedl, Rupert, et al.. (1983). Evolution und Menschenbild.5 indexed citations
14.
Dworschak, Peter C., et al.. (1983). Fauna und Flora des Mittelmeeres : ein systematischer Meeresführer für Biologen und Naturfreunde.8 indexed citations
15.
Riedl, Rupert. (1982). Evolution und Erkenntnis : Antworten auf Fragen aus unserer Zeit.6 indexed citations
16.
Riedl, Rupert & Daniela Auer. (1975). Die Ordnung des Lebendigen : Systembedingungen der Evolution.83 indexed citations
17.
Riedl, Rupert. (1973). In memoriam Fritz Gessner. Marine Biology. 22(4). 293–294.3 indexed citations
Riedl, Rupert. (1966). Biologie der Meereshöhlen : Topographie, Faunistik und Ökologie eines unterseeischen Lebensraumes : eine monographie.6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.