Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of R.S.V. Pullin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R.S.V. Pullin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R.S.V. Pullin more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R.S.V. Pullin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R.S.V. Pullin. The network helps show where R.S.V. Pullin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R.S.V. Pullin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R.S.V. Pullin.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R.S.V. Pullin based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with R.S.V. Pullin. R.S.V. Pullin is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Troell, Max, Barry A. Costa‐Pierce, Selina M. Stead, et al.. (2023). Perspectives on aquaculture's contribution to theSustainable Development Goalsfor improved human and planetary health. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society. 54(2). 251–342.89 indexed citations breakdown →
2.
Pullin, R.S.V., et al.. (1996). The Network of Tropical Aquaculture Scientists (NTAS) : 1987-1996. AquaDocs (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). 19(3). 27–31.1 indexed citations
3.
Villwock, W., et al.. (1996). A biochemical laboratory manual for species characterization of some tilapiine fishes. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.1 indexed citations
4.
Pullin, R.S.V., et al.. (1996). The third international symposium on tilapia in aquaculture. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.48 indexed citations
5.
Pullin, R.S.V.. (1995). Growth and sustainability of aquaculture. AquaDocs (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). 18(3). 19–20.
6.
Pullin, R.S.V.. (1994). Exotic species and genetically modified organisms in aquaculture and enhanced fisheries: ICLARM's position. AquaDocs (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). 17(4). 19–24.8 indexed citations
7.
Costa‐Pierce, Barry A., J. Moreau, & R.S.V. Pullin. (1993). New introductions of common carp (cyprinus carpio L.) and their impact on indigenous species in Sub-Saharan Africa. Discovery and Innovation. 5(3). 211–221.2 indexed citations
8.
Pullin, R.S.V., H. Rosenthal, & J.L. Maclean. (1993). Environment and aquaculture in developing countries. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.80 indexed citations
9.
Pullin, R.S.V.. (1993). Ex-situ conservation of the germplasm of aquatic organisms. AquaDocs (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). 16. 15–17.1 indexed citations
10.
Phillips, Michael J., Chung‐Kwei Lin, M.C.M. Beveridge, et al.. (1993). Shrimp culture and the environment: lessons from the world's most rapidly expanding warmwater aquaculture sector.. 171–197.68 indexed citations
11.
Pullin, R.S.V., Jalindar D. Ambekar, Trygve Gjedrem, et al.. (1991). The Genetic Improvement of Farmed Tilapias (GIFT) project: the story so far. AquaDocs (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). 14(2). 3–6.31 indexed citations
12.
Ambekar, Jalindar D., Hans B. Bentsen, Bjarne Gjerde, et al.. (1991). Approaches to national fish breeding programs: pointers from a tilapia pilot study. AquaDocs (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). 14(2). 10–12.16 indexed citations
13.
Ambekar, Jalindar D., et al.. (1991). Biochemical and morphometric approaches to characterize farmed tilapias. AquaDocs (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). 14(2). 7–9.11 indexed citations
14.
Pullin, R.S.V.. (1990). Down to earth thoughts on conserving aquatic genetic diversity. AquaDocs (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). 13(1). 5–8.9 indexed citations
15.
Pullin, R.S.V.. (1989). Third world aquaculture and the environment. NAGA.11 indexed citations
16.
Pullin, R.S.V.. (1988). Tilapia genetic resources for aquaculture : proceedings of the Workshop on Tilapia Genetic Resources for Aquaculture, 23-24 March 1987, Bangkok, Thailand.2 indexed citations
17.
Edwards, Peter, R.S.V. Pullin, & J. Gartner. (1988). Research and education for the development of integrated crop-livestock-fish farming systems in the tropics. Technical reports.29 indexed citations
18.
Moriarty, D. J. W. & R.S.V. Pullin. (1987). Detritus and microbial ecology in aquaculture ; proceedings of the conference on systems for aquaculture, 23-31 august 1985, Bellagio, Como, Italy.4 indexed citations
19.
Pullin, R.S.V.. (1986). Aquaculture development in Nepal: pointers for success. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 9(1). 9–10.2 indexed citations
20.
Pullin, R.S.V. & R. H. Lowe‐McConnell. (1982). The biology and culture of tilapias : proceedings of the International Conference on the Biology and Culture of Tilapias, 2-5 September 1980 at the Study and Conference Center of the Rockefeller Foundation, Bellagio, Italy, sponsored by the International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management, Manila.29 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.